AESTHETICS OF THE MOMENT: THE CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORAL MEANING THROUGH THAI RURAL LANDSCAPE PHOTOGRAPHY IN THE SERIES “ONE MOMENT FOR FUTURE”
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines how “time” is constructed through the aesthetics of rural landscape photography in the series One Moment for Future, exhibited at the Bangkok Art and Culture Centre in 2026. The analysis focuses on a key photograph depicting a boy resting on a white rock amid a wind turbine field in Chaiyaphum, with two additional images serving as contextual support. The study asks how “the moment” in such imagery constructs meanings of past, present, and future, and what aesthetic values emerge from this process. It adopts an interdisciplinary framework combining Cartier-Bresson’s concept of the Decisive Moment, Barthes’ notions of punctum and studium, visual semiotics (Barthes and Peirce), and ecological aesthetics in the context of the Anthropocene. The findings suggest that temporality is constructed through three aesthetic strategies: (1) the symbolic juxtaposition of clean energy technology and traditional agriculture, (2) the use of human posture as an index of psychological temporality, and (3) twilight lighting as a signifier of transition between epochs. The article proposes the concept of an “Aesthetics of the Transitional Moment” as a new analytical framework for interpreting photographic works that capture socio-ecological transformations in rural Thailand. It contributes by bridging global aesthetic theories with a contemporary Thai context and by positioning photography as a discourse on sustainable futures.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author(s) is only responsible for data appearing in the submitted manuscript of Interdisciplinary social sciences and communication journal.Besides, this journal encourages and enables you to share data such as statements, contents, figures, etc. that support your research publication where appropriate, and enables you to interlink the data with proper citation.
References
Atkin, A. (2022). Peirce’s theory of signs. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2022 ed.). Stanford University.https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/peirce-semiotics/
Barthes, R. (1977). Image–music–text (S. Heath, Trans.). Hill and Wang.
Barthes, R. (1981). Camera lucida: Reflections on photography (R. Howard, Trans.). Hill and Wang.
Berleant, A. (1992). The aesthetics of environment. Temple University Press.
Berleant, A. (2005). Aesthetics and environment: Variations on a theme. Ashgate.
Burtynsky, E. (n.d.). Anthropocene. https://www.edwardburtynsky.com/projects/photographs/anthropocene
Cartier-Bresson, H., & Chéroux, C. (2024). The decisive moment (New ed.). Fondation Henri Cartier-Bresson.
Saito, Y. (2007). Everyday aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Saito, Y. (2017). Aesthetics of the familiar: Everyday life and world-making. Oxford University Press.
Satpretpry, B. (2026). Windmill [Photograph]. International Photography Exhibition “One Moment for Future,”. Bangkok Art and Culture Centre.
Sontag, S. (1977). On photography. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Watabaek Subdistrict Administrative Organization. (n.d.). Tourist attraction. https://www.watabaek.go.th/data.php?content_id=12