PROBLEMS WITH THE PROSECUTION OF MINOR CORRUPTION AND MISCONDUCT OFFENSES BY INQUIRY OFFICIALS IN CASES DELEGATION BY THE NATIONAL ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION (NACC)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: The Organic Act on Counter Corruption, B.E. 2561, Sections 61 and 63, authorizes the National Anti-Corruption Commission to entrust corruption and malfeasance cases to inquiry officials for investigation and prosecution on its behalf when circumstances are not deemed serious. However, the Act does not prescribe specific criteria or standards for determining the seriousness of such cases. This lack of statutory guidance creates challenges in exercising discretion, particularly in cases without precedent. Research Objective: 1) To examine the problems encountered in the prosecution of minor corruption and misconduct cases by investigating officers, especially regarding the assignment of such cases to the National Anti-Corruption Commission.2) To study and analyze the legal provisions that define and classify minor offenses in corruption and misconduct cases.3.) To propose guidelines for developing legal innovations and procedures for prosecuting minor corruption and misconduct cases by investigating officers. Research Methodology: This study employs a qualitative research approach through documentary analysis, drawing on both primary and secondary sources, including laws, textbooks, academic articles, and relevant research papers.. Research Results: The findings reveal that the criteria for determining minor corruption and misconduct offenses are outlined only in the internal guidelines of the National Anti-Corruption Commission, specifically Orders No. 1239/2561 and No. 1240/2561. These guidelines, however, lack the status of statutory law. Consequently, this impacts the discretionary authority to delegate minor corruption and misconduct cases to investigating officers for prosecution.. Conclusion: The findings reveal that the criteria for determining minor corruption and misconduct offenses are outlined only in the internal guidelines of the National Anti-Corruption Commission, specifically Orders No. 1239/2561 and No. 1240/2561. These guidelines, however, lack the status of statutory law. Consequently, this impacts the discretionary authority to delegate minor corruption and misconduct cases to investigating officers for prosecution.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author(s) is only responsible for data appearing in the submitted manuscript of Interdisciplinary social sciences and communication journal.Besides, this journal encourages and enables you to share data such as statements, contents, figures, etc. that support your research publication where appropriate, and enables you to interlink the data with proper citation.
References
Act of the Constitution on the Prevention and Suppression of National Corruption B.E. 2561. (2018, July 21). Government Gazette, 135, Section 52A.
Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act B.E. 2551. (2008, February 6). Government Gazette, 125, Section 29A.
Bamrungsilp, J. (2022). Take action against corruption. https://www.naewna.com/columnist/1310
Chutiwong, K. (2008). Explanation of the law on the nature of evidence (8th printing). Nitibannakarn Publishing.
Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2560. (2017, April 6). Government Gazette, 134, Section 40A.
Dechaphiratnamongkol, Y. (2022). The use of the National Anti-Corruption Commission's power to summon investigators' investigation files during the public prosecutor's consideration of cases (Personal report, 10th training course on the Rule of Law for Democracy). College of the Constitutional Court, Office of the Constitutional Court.
Na Nakhon, K. (2021). Criminal procedure law I (10th ed.). Winyuchon.
Korkittichai, C. (2016). Laws on combating corruption. https://dl.parliament.go.th/backoffice/viewer2300/web/viewer.php
Kumphon, P. (2003). Consideration of the accusatory and inquisitorial systems in Thai law that affect the protection of human rights. Journal of the Constitutional Court, 5(13), 34–50.
National Anti-Corruption Commission. (2023). Corruption situation in Thailand, fiscal year 2023.Office of the National Counter Corruption Commission. (2023). Anti-corruption path. https://acm.nacc.go.th/history
Phakdeethanakun, C. (2024). Explanation of the law on evidence (18th ed.). Legal Training Institute of the Thai Bar Association.
Rattanakorn, S. (2014). Explanation of the law on the nature of evidence (11th printing). Nitibannakarn Publishing House.
Transparency International. (2025). Corruption Perceptions Index 2024. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2024
Wiriyachaiwong, R. (2018). The Criminal Court for Corruption and Misconduct Cases and solving the corruption problem. Ratthapirak Journal, 60(1), 41-54.