THE ETHICAL IMAGE OF CONTENT CREATORS IN THE DIGITAL ERA: VIEW AND EXPECTATION OF MEDIA EXECUTIVE, HIRER, ACADEMICIAN, CONTENT CREATOR AND AUDIENCE
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Digital content creators' ethical image is a crucial factor reflecting their ability to produce quality content that meets the needs of their target audience. Objective: To investigate the perspectives and expectations of media executives, employers, academics, content creators, and the general audience regarding the ethical image of digital content creators. Method: This qualitative study was conducted with 36 key informants using in-depth interviews and content analysis from digital platforms. Data was analyzed using a thematic approach and triangulation. Results: This study revealed that perspectives and expectations toward the ethical image of digital content creators were more positive than negative. They are expected creators to be trustworthy, sincere, and provide fact-based information without promoting consumerism. Furthermore, they should be open to different opinions, plan substantive content, and adhere to professional ethics. Most key informants have high expectations, as the role of content creators significantly influences the audience's thoughts and values. However, those with moderate to low expectations found the causes to be business factors that prioritize audience engagement over content quality, a mismatch between the constructed image and reality, content with inappropriate language for children, and a focus on trending social stories without proper fact-checking. Conclusion: Content creators are therefore a vital mechanism for fostering an ethical consciousness in the communication process by producing quality content to drive and elevate a knowledgeable society for the public good.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author(s) is only responsible for data appearing in the submitted manuscript of Interdisciplinary social sciences and communication journal.Besides, this journal encourages and enables you to share data such as statements, contents, figures, etc. that support your research publication where appropriate, and enables you to interlink the data with proper citation.
References
Arriagada and Ibáñez. (2020). “You need at least one picture daily, if not, you’re dead”: Content creators and platform evolution in the social media ecology. Social Media+Society, July-September,1-12. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2056305120944624
Arriagada, A., & Ibáñez, F. (2019). Communicative value chains: Fashion bloggers and branding agencies as cultural intermediaries. In L. Vodanovic (Ed.), Lifestyle journalism: Social media, consumption and experience (pp. 91–101). Routledge.
Benham, J. (2020). Best practices for journalistic balance: Gatekeeping, imbalance and the fake news era. Journalism Practice, 14(7), 791-811. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1658538
Blatt, M. M., & Kohlberg, L. (1975). The effect of classroom moral upon children’s level of moral judgment. Journal of Moral Education, 4(2), 129-161.
Boonnayothai, P. (2012). Perception and Attitude of Consumer toward The Sustainable Development Activities Media of Siam Cement Group Public Company Limited. [Master Thesis, Duhrakij Pundit University]. DOI: https://doi.nrct. go.th/ListDoi/listDetail?Resolve_DOI=10.14458/DPU.the.2013.1
Cotter, K. (2019). Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society, 21(4), 895–913.
Craig, D. (2019). Creator management in the social media entertainment industry. In M. Deuze & M. Prenger (Eds.), Making: Production, practices, and professions (pp. 363–374). Amsterdam University Press.
Craig, D., & Cunningham, S. (2019). Social media entertainment: The new intersection of Hollywood and Silicon Valley. New York University Press.
Dataxet Infoquest. (2024, September 8). The influencer market continues to grow, but identity must be clear to survive. https://www.dataxet.co/media-landscape/2024-th/influencer
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral+ judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814-834.
Hanwilai, N. (2017). Thai media using Buddhist intergration. [Doctoral dissertation, Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University]. https://ethesis.mcu.ac.th/storage/jN6IZEabVFMNqkCyCfVCw1gpv2XUAGCWVwyrdQRy.pdf
Henpenrueang. (2024, Auguest 12). Pitch, PhuyBao London, the one behind the viral phrase "each meal,each day ". https://www.youtube.com /watch?v=_px8zns-yXo
Jaturongkakul, A., & Jaturongkakul, D. (2007). Consumer behavior. (8th ed.). Thammasat University Press.
Jefkins, F. (1993). Modern marketing. (Framework Series) (3rd ed). Ft Prentice-Hall.
Keawthep, K., & Chaikunpol, N. (2012). News media guide. Karnpim Limited Partnership.
Khaneekul, J. (2018). Strategy of public communication in Thailand 4.0 era in case of department of science service. [Individual study]. Dhurakij Pundit University.
Little monster Family. (2024, March 30). Dealing with a broken heart: Jin answers more teen questions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9z_ovdzsu0)
Little monster Family. (2024, June 22). A bedroom makeover: new ambiance, minimalist design.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZxBUIs61Bs
Logan, K. R. (2010). Understanding news media: Extending Marshall McLuhan. Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Mandala Team. (2024, September 14). Techniques for digital content creators.https://blog. Mandala system.com /th/digital-content-creator
McQuail, D. (2010). McQuali’s mass communication theory. (6th ed). Sage Publications.
Neamcharoun, S. (2017). Case study: vision of media entrepreneurs and media producer versus the changing of consumers behavior through the online media. [ Master Thesis]. Thammasat University
https://ethesisarchive.library.tu.ac.th/thesis/2017/TU_2017_5902010247_8055_6633.pdf
Neungchamnong, P. (2024, September 14). When prosumers take over media space, who sets the ethical standards https://www.presscouncil.or.th/ethics/4386
Nuritmon, W. (2024, September 15). Influencer marketing. https://bait.rmutsb.ac.th/content/influencer-marketing/
Phoovatis, W. (2022). Thai mass media: Ethical consciousness in news reporting in the era of mass media convergence. Kasem Bundit Journal. 23(2), 28-42
Pitakwong, S. (2020). Attitudes and behaviors towards green marketing for Thai consumer. [Master Thesis]. Chiangmai University. https://archive.cm.mahidol.ac.th/bitstream /123456789/ 3586/1/TP% 20MM.017%202563.pdf
Psychopitchy. (2024, May 28). This is me introducing myself. https://www.tiktok.com/@pitchwitchsit/video/7374033670522277121?_r=1&_t=8qmFTuYw04D
Psychopitchy. (2024, September 24). Hell cheesy! Phuy Bao’s breakfast this morning. https:// www.tiktok.com/@pitchwitchsit/video/7418079413335575815?_r=1&_t=8qmGQ8S1VHs
Sirimanont, S. (1987). Ethics of Journalists. Bangkok: Supa Sirimanont Fund and Aksornsarn.
Tantiprapa, P. (2010). Marketing principle. (5th ed.). Department of Marketing, Faculty of BusinessAdministration, Chiang Mai University.
Thairath Online. (2024, September 8). 70 million Thais, 9 million are now content creators, high competition, to survive you must be different. https://www.thairath.co.th/money/ business_marketing /marketing/2812356
The Standard. (2023, June 2). Strategies for training body and mind to create power for workers. https://thestandard.co/podcast/thesecretsauce-strategyclinic-ep35/
The Standard. (2024, October 23). Reading the new China: US election storm, real estate recovery, economic stimulus, impact on Thailand. https://thestandard.co/podcast_channel/thesecretsauce/
Sittiweckin, W. (2024, September 24). Content creator, a money-making profession in the digital age. [Youtube]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kU-n7lMoUM.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2001). Consciousness, control and confidence: The 3 CS of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 130(3), 360-379.
Yayu, F. (2024). Ethical responsibilities in the backends of media and digital technologies. Journal of Media Ethics, 39(1), 61-66. DOI:10.1080/23736992.2024.2296194