Implementation of Design Thinking in Film and Television Education: A Comprehensive Analysis

Main Article Content

Mengying Chen
Parama Kwangmuang

Abstract

The implementation of design thinking in film and television education represents a critical challenge as traditional pedagogical approaches struggle to meet evolving industry demands. This study evaluates the effectiveness of design thinking integration in a Chinese art university's film and television program through three objectives: assessing teaching and learning implementation effectiveness, measuring creative thinking skills development, and analyzing collaborative performance impact. Using a mixed-methods approach over 18 months, the study examined 15 freshman students and 15 faculty members, employing validated instruments including the Learning Environment Assessment Questionnaire (LEAQ), Creative Thinking Development Scale (CTDS), and Collaborative Performance Evaluation Rubric (CPER). Results revealed significant improvements across all measured dimensions: media implementation achieved the highest effectiveness score (4.27/5.0) with 92% student engagement; creative thinking showed substantial development, particularly in flexibility (66.5% increase) and originality (54.1% increase); and collaborative performance demonstrated progressive improvement from initial planning (82%) to final delivery (94%). The study uncovered a novel correlation between media implementation quality and creative thinking development, suggesting that technological integration serves as a catalyst for creativity in specialized media education. These findings provide empirical evidence for the effectiveness of design thinking in film and television education while offering a framework for implementation in similar specialized educational contexts.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
M. Chen and P. . Kwangmuang, “Implementation of Design Thinking in Film and Television Education: A Comprehensive Analysis ”, EDGKKUJ, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 122–145, Apr. 2025.
Section
บทความวิจัย (Research article)

References

Affendi, N. B. (2024). Enhancing students’ performance in integrated project course through collaborative learning and open artificial intelligence chatbot. JUMPER Journal of Educational Multidisciplinary Research, 3(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.56921/jumper.v3i2.198

Crook, C. (2022). CSsCL: The performance of collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 17(1), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-022-09364-y

Dorland, A. (2023). Failing to learn: Design thinking and the development of a failure-positive mindset in the university classroom. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 14. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v14i1.7155

Felix, A., Moreeng, B., & Mosia, M. (2024). Design thinking: An alternative for educational ICT integration training? E-Journal of Music Research, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.2024535

Fridman, I., Meron, Y., & Roberts, J. (2022). Responsible design thinking: Informing future models of cross-disciplinary design education. Journal of Design Business & Society, 8(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00037_1

Hang, B. T. T. (2024). Developing creative thinking in STEM education through design-based learning. VNU Journal of Science Education Research. https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4888

Kasim, A. A. M., Darus, N. A., Lee, N. A. A., Subramaniam, A. L. B., & Januin, J. (2022). Online collaborative performance in group-based tasks among learners of higher education. Deleted Journal, 9(3), 948–966. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i3.24861

Kozik, V., Sofilkanych, M., Bilozub, L., Korsunskyi, V., & Babii, N. (2022). Problems and prospects of the development of creative design thinking of higher education students in the conditions of digitalization. EDUWEB, 16(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2022.16.02.9

Liu, W., Huang, R., Wang, J., Chen, Y., Ohashi, T., Li, B., Liu, Y., Qiu, D., Yu, R., Zhang, J., Mahmud, A. A., & Leifer, L. (2024). Empathy design thinking: Cultivating creative minds in primary education. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1376305

Lubis, A. I., Supardianto, S., Santiputri, M., Ardi, N., & Uperiati, A. (2024). Project-based learning performance measurement using VIKOR method and rank order centroid. JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi, 10(3), 491–498. https://doi.org/10.33330/jurteksi.v10i3.2853

Nasution, T., Ganefri, G., Ridwan, R., & Ambiyar, A. (2022). Development of cooperative project. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5549–5562. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6ns6.10853

Oberer, B., & Erkollar, A. (2024). Education 5.0: Using the design thinking process – An interdisciplinary view. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics, 22(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.54808/jsci.22.01.1

Rupavijetra, P., Nilsook, P., Jitsupa, J., & Nopparit, T. (2022). Collaborative project-based learning to train students for conducting the training project for older adults. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE, 11(4), 2039. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i4.22888

Shigeta, T., & Ito, Y. (2023). “Design thinking” as collaborative creativity in group work: A case study at a Japanese liberal arts university. AHFE International. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003119

Sotlikova, R. (2023). Design thinking in education: Empowering students in ELT class. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 13, 196–199. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v13i.904

Taşpinar, Ş. E. (2022). Tasarım odaklı düşünme ve sanat eğitimi. Sanat Ve Tasarım Dergisi, 12(2), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1221700

Velu, S. R. (2022). Design thinking approach for increasing innovative action in universities: ICT’s mediating effect. Sustainability, 15(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010024

Von Thienen, J. P. A., Weinstein, T. J., & Meinel, C. (2023). Creative metacognition in design thinking: Exploring theories, educational practices, and their implications for measurement. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1157001