CRITICAL READING FOR PROFESSIONS

Main Article Content

Silpa Rasri

Abstract

         Critical reading is an indispensible skill for teaching professionals across various fields, which facilitates a deeper understanding and analyzing complex texts. This skill enables individuals to engage with content beyond surface-level comprehension, allowing them to evaluate arguments, and synthesize information effectively. In professions where decision-making and problem-solving are necessary, critical reading supports the ability to discern relevant information, challenge assumptions, and make informed judgments. Moreover, it enhances the capacity to communicate insights and findings more clearly. It is vital in collaborative and interdisciplinary settings. This article has got the purpose and how to get the data through the methodology and its findings as mentioned below


       Purpose: This article explores how importance critical reading skills are crucial in professional settings, highlighting how these skills contribute to effective decision-making, problem-solving, and continuous learning across various professions.


       Methodology: The data are from the study which employs a mixed-methods approach; that is, the quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews with professionals from diverse fields; medicine, law, business and engineering. The quantitative component assesses the prevalence and perceived importance of critical reading skills, whereas the qualitative component delves into specific experiences and strategies used by professionals to enhance their reading capabilities.


        Findings: The findings reveal that critical reading skills are universally valued across professions, with a significant correlation between the level of these skills and job performance. Key strategies, which are identified for enhancing critical reading, include engaging with peer-reviewed literature, participating in professional reading groups, and utilizing digital tools for annotation and analysis. The study also highlights the barriers to developing these skills, such as time constraints and the overwhelming volume of information.


         Implications: The article based on the study as mentioned above suggests that interestingly structured critical reading training into professional development programs can lead to improved job performance and newly innovation. Organizations are encouraged to foster a culture that values continuous learning and provides resources to support the development of critical reading skills.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Fisher, A., & Scriven, M. (1997). Critical Thinking: Its Definition and Assessment. Edgepress.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking: Concepts and Tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.

Brookfield, S. (2012). Teaching for Critical Thinking: Tools and Techniques to Help Students Question Their Assumptions. Jossey-Bass.

Kurland, D. J. (2000). How the Mind Works: Critical Thinking. Pearson Education.

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. The California Academic Press.

Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical Thinking Assessment. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 179-186.

Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in Education. Cambridge University Press.

National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking. (1987). A Definition of Critical Thinking. Retrieved from Critical Thinking Community.

Pithers, R. T., & Soden, R. (2000). Critical Thinking in Education: A Review. Educational Research, 42(3), 237-249.

Moon, J. (2008). Critical Thinking: An Exploration of Theory and Practice. Routledge.