Architectural design learning approach using real PBL and service-learning for integrating construction techniques and sustainability
Keywords:
architectural design studio, Real Project-Based Learning (Real PBL), Service-Learning (SL), construction techniques, sustainabilityAbstract
Most architecture curricula today struggle to link understanding of construction methods with design principles. In the project design training of architectural design studio course, most of the results will be conceptual or preliminary designs depending on the project’s level of complexity. Teaching architecture students how to translate their ideas from conceptual to actual construction drawings in a single semester can be challenging. Consequently, recent graduates lack knowledge of construction techniques and detailed designs. This article reviews the lessons learned during the teaching of “architectural detail studio” option unit in the advanced architectural design course for bachelor of science in architecture program, Faculty of Architecture and Planning, Thammasat University. The studio experimented with a learning process that integrated design and construction to develop actual construction drawings through Real Project Based Learning (Real PBL), which was a collaboration between the school and foundations, community organizations, or public interest organizations. It also improved Service-Learning through the university’s policy on sustainable social development. The outcomes of this architectural learning process are assessed using 3 PBL elements: the learning approach, the content approach, and the social approach. This teaching process is not only beneficial to educational innovation that focuses on addressing the lack of construction techniques knowledge in professional architecture curricula, but also strengthen the students’ public consciousness.
References
Association of Siamese Architects under the Royal Patronage (ASA). (2020). Architect Expo’20 “heritage in danger” design competition announcement. Retrieved December 29, 2020, from https://www.asaexpo.org /heritage-in-danger-competition
Barrows, H.S. & Tamblyn, R.M. (1980). Problem-based learning: an approach to medical education. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Duch, B.J., Groh, S.E. & Allen, D.E. (2001). The power of problem-based learning. Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
Graaff, E. & Kolmos, A. (2007). History of problem-based and project-based learning. In Graaff, E. & Kolmos, A. (Ed.). Management of change: implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering (pp.1-8). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Grant, M.M. (2002). Getting a grip on project-based learning: theory, cases and recommendations. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 5(1), 1-17.
Jacoby, B. (1996). Service-learning in higher education: concepts and practices. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Kolmos, A., et al. (2008). Facilitation in a PBL-environment. Retrieved August 1, 2021, from https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/16177510/Facilitation_in_a_PBL_environment.pdf
Kuh, G.D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: what they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, D.C.: The American Association of Colleges and Universities (AAC&U).
Nanagara, Y. (2002). Nawattakam karn sueksa sathapattayakam. (In Thai) [Architectural education innovation]. Retrieved August 1, 2021, from http://pioneer.chula.ac.th/~yongyudh/book2/architectural-education-innovation-2.htm
Perez, S. (2000). Assessing service learning using pragmatic principles of education: a Texas charter school case study (Master’s thesis). San Marcos: Texas State University
Phattanawasin, S. (2018). Syllabus for AR 416 advanced architectural design (architectural detail studio unit) in semester 2/2017. Pathum Thani: Faculty of Architecture and Planning, Thammasat University.
Phattanawasin, S. (2022). Neawtang karnrianru wicha oakbab sathapattayakam doi chai chot khrongngan ching lae karnborikarn sangkhom pen than phuea buranakarn theknik karn kosang lae khwam yangyuen. (In Thai) [Architectural design learning approach using Real PBL and service learning for integrating construction techniques and sustainability] (Final report). Pathum Thani: Faculty of Architecture and Planning, Thammasat University.
Sigmon, R.L. (1997). Linking service with learning in liberal arts education. Washington, D.C.: Council for Independent Colleges.
Thammasat University. (2018). Thammasat mung songsoem karnrian karnson doi karn borikarn sangkhom. (In Thai) [Thammasat aims to promote teaching by social service learning]. Retrieved December 29, 2020, from https://tu.ac.th/thammasat-service-learning-2nd-semester-2560
Toole, J & Toole, P. (1995). Reflection as a tool for turning service experiences into learning experiences. In Toole, J. (Ed.). Enriching the curriculum through Service Learning (pp.99-114). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Faculty of Architecture, Chiang Mai University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.