An Analysis for the establishment of a public transportation system for all in Thailand: A case study of Trang Municipality, Trang Province
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The establishment of public transportation system for all is a pertinent issue in Thailand, attributed to the significant increase in the elderly and disabled population over the past decade. The establishment of inclusive public transportation systems is a crucial aspect of creating urban environments that are accommodating to the elderly. Systematic data analysis is essential to adequately address the requirements of all user groups. This research aims to examine the possibilities, challenges, and requirements of users to inform the design of public transportation services for all in Trang Municipality, employing the principle of universal design throughout the process. The research instruments employed include: evaluation of satisfaction with public transportation services based on the World Health Organization's criteria for age-friendly urban environments, a survey assessing the travel requirements of the sample population, and in-depth interviews with stakeholders engaged in the development of public transportation systems within the study area. The research findings culminated in the formulation of a comprehensive master plan for public transportation system for all, encompassing 3 public bus route designs, 11 projects for the enhancement of sidewalks, intersections, and junctions to facilitate accessibility for the elderly and disabled, the establishment of 38 public bus stops, and strategic management recommendations aimed at ensuring the sustainable development of public transportation system for all within Trang Municipality.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All material is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, unless otherwise stated. As such, authors are free to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The authors must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. The authors may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. The authors may not use the material for commercial purposes. If the authors remix, transform, or build upon the material, they may not distribute the modified material, unless permission is obtained from JARS. Final, accepted versions of the paper may be posted on third party repositories, provided appropriate acknowledgement to the original source is clearly noted.
References
Ahern, A.; Hine, J. (2010). Transport needs of older people in rural Ireland. In Proceedings of the Irish Transport Research Network, Dublin, Ireland, 31 August–1st September 2010; ITRN: Azor, Israel, 2010.
Anthony Jnr, B.; Abbas Petersen, S.; Helfert, M.; Ahlers, D.; Krogstie, J. (2021). Modeling pervasive platforms and digital services for smart urban transformation using an enterprise architecture framework. Inf. Technol. People 2021, 34, 1285–1312.
Anthony, B., Jr. (2020). Applying enterprise architecture for digital transformation of electro mobility towards sustainable transportation. Proceedings of the 2020 on Computers and People Research Conference, Nuremberg, Germany, 19–21 June 2020; pp. 38–46.
Azevedo, G.A.; Sampaio, R.R.; Moret, M.A.; Murari, T.B. (2021). Sustainable urban mobility analysis for elderly and disabled people in São Paulo. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 791.
Battarra, R.; Zucaro, F.; Tremiterra, M.R. (2018). Smart mobility and elderly people. Can ICT make the city more accessible for everybody? TeMA-J. Land Use Mobil. Environ. 2018, 23–42.
Böcker, L.; van Amen, P.; Helbich, M. (2017). Elderly travel frequencies and transport mode choices in Greater Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Transportation 2017, 44, 831–852.
Fatima, K.; Moridpour, S.; De Gruyter, C.; Saghapour, T. (2020). Elderly sustainable mobility: Scientific paper review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7319.
Goh, M. M., Irvine, K., & Ung, M. I. (2022). To bus or not to bus: Structural equation modelling of ridership perceptions among university students as a planning tool to increase use of public transit in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS), 19(2), 105-124.
Gorman, M.; Jones, S.; Turner, J. (2019). Older people, mobility and transport in low-and middle-income countries: A review of the research. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6157.
Hjorthol, R.; Nordbakke, S.; Vågane, L.; Levin, L.; Sirén, A.; Ulleberg, P. (2011). Eldres Mobilitet og Velferd: Utvikling, Reisebehov og Tiltak. 2011. Retrieved from https://www.toi.no/getfile.php?mmfileid=22881.
Leopairojna, S. K. (2011). Improving Access to Public Transportation for Canalside Communities near Kasetsart University, Bangkhen. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS), 8(2), 27-50.
Metz, D.H. (2000). Mobility of older people and their quality of life. Transp. Policy 2000, 7, 149–152.
Oxley, J.; Langford, J.; Charlton, J. (2010) The safe mobility of older drivers: A challenge for urban road designers. J. Transp. Geogr. 2010, 18, 642–648.
Park, H.; Owens, J.M.; Yi, S.; Seong, Y. (2021). A Personalized Trip Planner for Vulnerable Road Users (No. CATM-2021-R1-NCAT). 2021. Retrieved from https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62599.
Rantanen, T. (2013). Promoting mobility in older people. J. Prev. Med. Public Health 2013, 46, S50.
Registration Office. (2024). Monthly population registration statistics. Retrieved from https://stat.bora.dopa.go.th/stat/statnew/statMONTH/statmonth/#/mainpage
Rosenbloom, S. (2005). The Mobility Needs of Older Americans: Implications for Transportation Reauthorization. 2005. Retrieved from https://trid.trb.org/view/839899.
Santinha, G.; Costa, C.; Diogo, S. (2018) How are local policies promoting older People’s mobility? A case study. Urban Sci. 2018, 2, 63.
Somenahalli, S.; Hayashi, Y.; Taylor, M.; Akiyama, T.; Adair, T.; Sawada, D. (2016). Accessible transportation and mobility issues of elderly—How does Australia compare with Japan? J. Sustain. Urban. Plan. Prog. 2016, 1, 31–43.
Velho, R. (2019). Transport accessibility for wheelchair users: A qualitative analysis of inclusion and health. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 2019, 8, 103–115WHO. World Health Organization Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide. World Health Organization. 2007. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43755.
World Health Organization. (2017). Global Strategy and Action Plan on Ageing and Health. Bern: World Health Organization.
World Health Organization. (2019). Age-Friendly Cities and Communities. 2019. Retrieved from https://www.paho.org/en/topics/age-friendly-cities-and-communities.
