Catalyzing Change: The Impact of Festivals on Bangkok’s Pak Khlong Flower Market
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the transformative impact of festivalization on Bangkok’s Pak Khlong Flower Market, focusing on design interventions and the experiences of local vendors. The introduction of festivals such as Bangkok Design Week has revitalized the market, drawing new customer groups and injecting energy into the area. However, this shift also has brought challenges, including vendor displacement and potential superficial commercialism. The creative interventions, initiated in response to the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration’s 2016 policy, highlight the necessity of continuous evaluation and adaptive management for sustainable urban regeneration. Despite the positive impacts, these changes risk triggering gentrification, threatening the market’s traditional character and leading to the displacement of long-standing vendors. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, incorporating qualitative and quantitative data gathered through participant surveys and focus group discussions. The findings indicate that while festivals have bolstered the local economy and attracted younger, economically active visitors, the benefits have not been evenly distributed among vendors. The strategic placement of artworks and installations has fostered a collaborative atmosphere but also underscored the limitations of short-term festivalization in achieving long-term urban regeneration. Key theoretical insights are drawn from urbanism literature, including the works of Jane Jacobs, David Sim, and Nabeel Hamdi, emphasizing the importance of small, incremental changes and reflective practice. The study critiques the potential negative impacts of gentrification, particularly the displacement caused by large corporations and rising rents, juxtaposing this with the positive outcomes of local vendor-driven gentrification, as exemplified by the All Flora shop. The paper concludes with recommendations for ensuring sustainable development, advocating for continuous evaluation, stakeholder engagement, and balanced integration of modern amenities with the market’s historical essence. Future research should explore the theoretical dimensions of these phenomena, examining how small-scale interventions can influence broader urban policies and practices. This balance between practical action and critical reflection is crucial for navigating the challenges and opportunities of urban regeneration.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All material is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, unless otherwise stated. As such, authors are free to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The authors must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. The authors may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. The authors may not use the material for commercial purposes. If the authors remix, transform, or build upon the material, they may not distribute the modified material, unless permission is obtained from JARS. Final, accepted versions of the paper may be posted on third party repositories, provided appropriate acknowledgement to the original source is clearly noted.
References
Appleyard, D. (1981). Livable streets. University of California Press.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey-Bass.
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (Eds.). (2013). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315059051
Carmona, M. (2015). Re-theorizing contemporary public space: A new narrative and a new normative. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 8(4), 373-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2014.909518
Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A short introduction. Blackwell Publishing.
Cudny, W. (2016). Festivalisation of urban spaces: Factors, processes and effects. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31997-1
Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Island Press.
Gehl, J., & Svarre, B. (2013). How to study public life. Island Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-525-0
Hamdi, N. (2004). Small change: About the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. Earthscan.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.
Johansson, M., & Kociatkiewicz, J. (2011). City festivals: Creativity and control in staged urban experiences. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18(4), 392-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776411407810
King, R. (2017). Heritage and identity in contemporary Thailand: Memory, place and power. NUS Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1xz0fp
King, R., & Lertnapakun, P. (2019). Ambiguous heritage and the place of tourism: Bangkok’s Rattanakosin. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 25(3), 298-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1493701
Koch, N. (Ed.). Spatializing authoritarianism. Syracuse University Press.
Madanipour, A. (1996). Design of urban space: An inquiry into a socio-spatial process. John Wiley & Sons.
Moon, J. A. (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development: Theory and practice. Kogan Page.
Neef, A. (2021). Tourism, land grabs and displacement: The darker side of the feel-good industry. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429340727
Project for Public Spaces. (2022). Placemaking: What if we built our cities around places?. PPS.org. https://www.pps.org/article/what-is-placemaking
Rugkhapan, N. T. (2022). Authoritarian urbanism: Space, law, and state exceptionalism in Bangkok’s Historic District. In N. Koch, Spatializing Authoritarianism (pp. 128-150). Syracuse University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2djhg8q.11
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.
Shelby, H., & Renwick, T. (2023). Displacement through the commons: Community and spatial order in Bangkok. City & Society, 35(3), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/ciso.12466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ciso.12466
Sim, D. (2019). Soft city: Building density for everyday life. Island Press.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Tovivich, S. (2022, March 24). Sense of place in Bangkok: Where is the flower market?. LSE. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/seac/2022/03/24/sense-of-place-in-bangkok-where-is-the-flower-market/
Trotter, G. (2010). Map of Rattanakosin (SVG). Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rattanakosin-map-new.svg
Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (2013). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771136
Zukin, S. (2010). Naked city: The death and life of authentic urban places. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195382853.001.0001