Exploring Sustainable Conservation: A Case Study on the Transformation of Knockdown Wooden Houses in Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to explore the local characteristics, development, and current status of knockdown wooden houses in Thailand’s central and northern regions to identify effective and sustainable development methods for the design process. Knockdown wooden houses are prefabricated structures that can be quickly assembled and disassembled. They can be transported as separate elements or complete tiny houses, offering high portability and convenience for relocation. The research methodology included a literature review, observation of knockdown house construction, and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. The findings revealed that the current state of knockdown wooden houses can be classified into three groups based on design adaptation and resource utilization. The first group adheres to a resilience approach in a conventional manner, while the second group adopts an adaptive approach, adjusting its design for modularity. Both groups use reclaimed wood. The third group adopts a transformative approach, emphasizing both architectural design and resource utilization. This group uses plantation teak, considers the entire system from wood resource to waste wood management, and shifts from linear to circular thinking. Their design prioritizes not only the product but also the sustainable process, in particular supporting the replanting of teak stands. The common characteristics of knockdown wooden houses in the Thai context include a preference for using reclaimed wood from dismantling old wooden buildings, a kinship system among carpenter groups, and flexible modular designs to meet owner needs and accommodate the unstandardized dimensions of reclaimed wood. The construction process consists of five main steps: material selection, wood processing, design, prefabrication, and installation, with an additional stage for waste wood management. This research advocates for promoting planted trees for sustainable wooden architecture, emphasizing the importance of managed forests. Design knowledge also should incorporate content about young wood material and modularity.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All material is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, unless otherwise stated. As such, authors are free to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The authors must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. The authors may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. The authors may not use the material for commercial purposes. If the authors remix, transform, or build upon the material, they may not distribute the modified material, unless permission is obtained from JARS. Final, accepted versions of the paper may be posted on third party repositories, provided appropriate acknowledgement to the original source is clearly noted.
References
Aktürk, G., & Fluck, H. (2022). Vernacular Heritage as a Response to Climate: Lessons for future climate resilience from Rize, Turkey. Land, 11(2), 276.
Anagnostou, G. (2018). The influence of traditional Japanese timber design and construction techniques on contemporary architecture and its relevance to modern timber construction. Gottstein Fellowship Report; Gottstein Trust: Sydney, Australia, 1-107.
Bhaskara, A., Nugraheni, F., & Hanafi, N. F. (2019). Recommendation of Knockdown Building Design at Yogyakarta Sand Dunes (Restricted and Heritage Areas). Semesta Teknika, 22(1), 79-87.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2),77-101.
Chaiwong, C. (2020). Suk Ruey Charoen. Retrieve, January, 2024, from https://readthecloud.co/sor-ruaycharoen/
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
De Araujo, V. A., Cortez-Barbosa, J., Gava, M., Garcia, J. N., de Souza, A. J. D., Savi, A. F., Morales, E. A. M., Molina, J. C., Vasconcelos, J. S., Christoforo, A. L., & Lahr, F. A. R. (2016a). Classification of wooden housing building systems. BioResources, 11(3), 7889-7901.
De Araujo, V. A., Cortez-Barbosa, J., Gava, M., Garcia, J. N., de Souza, A. J. D., Savi, A. F., Morales, E. A. M., Molina, J. C., Vasconcelos, J. S., Christoforo, A. L., & Lahr, F. A. R. (2016b). Wooden residential buildings–a sustainable approach. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series II: Forestry Wood Industry Agricultural Food Engineering, 53-62.
Dipasquale, L., Mecca, S., Özel, B., & Kısa, O. P. (2014). Resilience of vernacular architecture. In VerSus: heritage for the future. Vernacular knowledge for sustainable architecture (pp. 64-73). FUP Firenze University Press.
English Heritage. (2023). Sustainable conservation principles. Retrieve, January 12, 2024, from https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/about-us/our-priorities/sustainability/
European Forest Institute. (2020). Homegrown trees provide additional income in Thailand. Retrieve, November 12, 2023, from https://forestsmallholders.org/homegrown-trees-provide-additional-income-thailand/
Gunawardena, T., & Mendis, P. (2022). Prefabricated building systems—design and construction. Encyclopedia, 2(1), 70-95.
International Council on Monuments and Sites. (2017). Principles for the conservation of wooden built heritage. Retrieved January 16, 2024, from https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/General_Assemblies/19th_Delhi_2017/Working_Documents-First_Batch-August_2017/GA2017_6-34_WoodPrinciples_EN_final20170730.pdf
Larsen, K. E., & Marstein, N. (2016). Conservation of historic timber structures. An ecological approach. Riksantikvaren.
Lehmann, S., & Kremer, P. D. (2023). Filling the kowledge gaps in mass timber construction. Mass Timber
Construction Journal, 6(1), 1-10.
Makka, M. (2020). Transition of teak timber supply chain in architecture. Chulalongkorn University Theses and Dissertations (Chula ETD). 3888. https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/chulaetd/3888
Moradibistouni, M., & Gjerde, M. (2017). Potential for prefabrication to enhance the New Zealand construction industry. Proceedings of the Back to the Future: The Next, 50, 427-435.
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. (2009). Forestry in Thailand. Royal Forest Department.
O’Connell, D., Walker, B., Abel, N., & Grigg, N. (2015). The resilience, adaptation and transformation assessment framework: From theory to application. Camberra, CSIRO.
Ozel, B., Dipasquale, L., & Mecca, S. (2015). Resilience and intangible heritage of vernacular architecture. In Vernacular Architecture: Towards a Sustainable Future (pp. 571-576). Taylor & Francis Group, London.
Paper Manufacturers Association of South Africa. (2022). WOOD – the ultimate renewable resource for a circular economy. Retrieved May 22, 2024, from https://infrastructurenews.co.za/2022/09/01/wood-the-ultimate-renewable-resource-for-a-circular-economy/
Punpairoj, P. (2010). The transformation of traditional Thai houses: Steps toward recognition of changing vernacular forms. [Doctoral dissertation, Silpakorn University].
Safarik, D., Elbrecht, J., & Miranda, W. (2022). State of tall timber 2022. CTBUH Journal, 2022(I), 22-31.
Schouten, N., Haisma, R., Rohmer, M. & Boer, E. (2023). Impact scan for timber construction in Europe. Netherland: Metabolic.
Sritipasarn, S. (2023). Knockdown teak timber houses. Retrieve, November 12, 2023, from https://www.baanlaesuan.com/220185/houses/baanknockdownsak
Stockholm Resilience Centre. (2013). Seeing the forest for more trees. Retrieved July 26, 2024, from https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/research-news/2013-01-08-seeing-the-forest-for-more-trees.html.
Thunwiwatkul, Y. (2016). Traditional house: A local wisdom in Thai architecture. Museum Siam.
Tienthavorn, T. (2019). Transformation of Cultural Landscape through Resilience Lens: A Case Study of Mae Kampong Village, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 16, 85-100.
Tienthavorn, T. (2024). The Practical Renovation of a Privately-Owned Wooden House: Case of Khun Prasit’s House, Ang Thong Province, Thailand. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS), 21(1), 15-34.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2023a). Circularity concepts in wood construction. Retrieved December 22, 2023, from https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2023-05/ECE_TIM_DP95E_web.pdf
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2023b). The future of sustainable building is wood. Retrieved December 22, 2023, from https://unece.org/climate-change/news/future-sustainable-building-wood
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2003). The convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. Retrieved January 22, 2023, from https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). Intangible cultural heritage and sustainable development. Retrieved February 16, 2023, from https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/34299-EN.pdf