Bridging Global Policy-making and Local Intensive Developments in the Urban Voids of a Megacity: Insights from Bangkok
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Megacities and rapidly urbanizing territories are contemporary issues which have now reached international attention and institutional recognition. Megacities and rapidly urbanizing territories in Southeast Asia especially are subject to both intensive and extensive patterns of growth that are reflected by the dynamics of densification in consolidated urban areas and loss of agricultural lands due to development in peri-urban areas. The New Urban Agenda and the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide an international shared understanding of policies and knowledge to tackle, among other issues, loss of agricultural land, general land use management, segregation and inequalities within megacities and rapidly urbanizing regions. However, oftentimes, this international level of policy-making loses its strength when the urban issues are scaled down to local applications. Influenced by the presence of local private interests and global economic forces, the local urban processes of intensive and extensive growth appear to be detached from the general international policy framework and affected by site-specific dynamics. This article examines the level of this separation in Bangkok, especially in regards to a specific kind of the aforementioned intensive growth at the metropolitan scale, the development of the urban voids - terrain vague. I discuss how this separation is more evident in those empty, underused, and abandoned areas where possible intensive developments could happen. Furthermore, I evaluate this separation by reflecting on how it can affect the upcoming future of the megacity of Bangkok.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All material is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, unless otherwise stated. As such, authors are free to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The authors must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. The authors may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. The authors may not use the material for commercial purposes. If the authors remix, transform, or build upon the material, they may not distribute the modified material, unless permission is obtained from JARS. Final, accepted versions of the paper may be posted on third party repositories, provided appropriate acknowledgement to the original source is clearly noted.
References
Abedini, A., & Khalili, A. (2019). Determining the capacity infill development in growing metropolitans: A case study of Urmia city. Journal of Urban Management, 8(2), 316-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2019.04.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2019.04.001
Ali, G; Pumijumnong, & N., Shenghui, C. (2018). Valuation and validation of carbon sources and sinks through land cover/use change analysis: The case of Bangkok metropolitan area. Land Use Policy, 70 (1), 471 - 478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.003
Askew, M. (2002). Bangkok: Place, Practice and Representation. London, UK: Routledge.
Atlas of Urban Expansion. (2016). Bangkok. Retrived March 12, 2024, from http://atlasofurbanexpansion.org/cities/view/Bangkok
Berisha, E., Caprioli, C., & Cotella, G. (2022). Unpacking SDG target 11.a: What is it about and how to measure its progress? City and Environment Interactions, 14(100080). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cacint.2022.100080
Berisha, E., Caprioli, C., & Cotella, G. (2022). Unpacking SDG target 11.a: What is it about and how to measure its progress? City and Environment Interactions, 14 (100080), 100080.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cacint.2022.100080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cacint.2022.100080
Bangkok Post. (2023). The Met argues for fairness and against the EIA Approval of the 125 Sathorn Project. Retrieved August 30, 2023, from https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/pr/2251371
Baumeister, R.F., & Leary, M.R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1 (3), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.1.3.311
Cappai, F., Forgues, D., & Glaus, M. (2019). A Methodological Approach for Evaluating Brownfield Redevelopment Projects. Urban Science, 3(2). 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3020045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3020045
Castells-Quintana, D., & Wenban-Smith, H. (2020). Population dynamics, urbanisation without growth, and the rise of megacities. The Journal of Development Studies, 56(9), 1663–1682. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2019.1702160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2019.1702160
Chen, N., Heligman, L. (1994). Growth of the world’s megalopolises. In Fuchs, R.J., Brennan, E., Chamie, J., Lo F., Uitto, J. I. (Eds.). Mega-city growth and the future, United Nations University Press.
Chakraborty, S., Dadashpoor, H., Novotný, J., Maity, I., Follmann, A., Patel, P. P., Roy, U., & Pramanik, S. (2022). In pursuit of sustainability – Spatio-temporal pathways of urban growth patterns in the world’s largest megacities. Cities (London, England), 131(103919), 103919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103919
De Solà-Morales, I. (1995). Terrain Vague. Anyplace, 199, 118-123. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press.
De Sousa, C. (2002). Measuring the Public Costs and Benefits of Brownfield versus Greenfield Development in the Greater Toronto Area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29(2), 251-280. https://doi.org/10.1068/b1283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b1283
Dick, H., W., Rimmer, P. (1998). Beyond the Third World City: The New Urban Geography of South-east Asia. In Urban Studies, 35(12), 2303-2321. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098983890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098983890
Fuchs, R., Brennan, E., Chamie, J., Lo, & F.,Uitto, J.I. (1994). Mega-city growth and the future, United Nations University Press.
Grossi, G., & Trunova, O. (2021). Are UN SDGs useful for capturing multiple values of smart city? Cities, 114(103193). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103193
Guimarães, P. (2019). Shopping centres in decline: Analysis of demalling in Lisbon. Cities, 87(1), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.021
Hogan, T., Bunnell, T., Pow, C.-P., Permanasari, E., & Morshidi, S. (2012). Asian urbanisms and the privatization of cities. Cities, 29(1), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.01.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.01.001
Klinchuanchun, P. (2022). Thailand industry outlook 2022-24. Retail Space in BMR. Krungsri Research. Retrieved August 30, 2023, from/https://www.krungsri.com/getmedia/26cef54c-f78b-45f6-8cd0-18bbff5028a8/IO_Retail_Space_BMR_220926_EN_EX.pdf.aspx
Korff, R. (2020). Urban Governance. Equilibri, Rivista per lo sviluppo sostenibile, special, 91-101. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1406/98102
Kotzé, L. J., Kim, R. E., Burdon, P., et al. (2022). Planetary Integrity. In Biermann, F., Hickmann, T., Sénit, C.A. (Eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals. Transforming Governance Through Global Goals? Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009082945.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009082945.007
Kraas, F. (2007). Megacities and global change in East, Southeast and South Asia. ASIEN - The German Journal of Contemporary Asia, 103(4), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.11588/ASIEN.2007.103.15052.
Kraas, F., Aggarwal, S., Coy, M., and Mertin, G. (2014). Megacities: Our Global Urban Future. Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3417-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3417-5
Lal, R., et al. (2021). Soils and sustainable development goals of the United Nations: An International Union of Soil Sciences perspective. Geoderma Regional, 25(1), e00398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00398
Lo, F.-C., & Marcotullio, P. J. (2000). Globalisation and urban transformations in the Asia-pacific region: A review. Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 37(1), 77–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098002302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098002302
Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment [ONEP]. (2021a). Kānpramœ ̄ nphon krathop singwǣtlō̜m [Environmental Impact Assessment]. Retrieved August 30, 2023, from https://www.onep.go.th/%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B0%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%9C%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B0%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B4%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%87%E0%B9%81/
Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment [ONEP]. (2021b). Environmental Impact Assessment in Thailand. Division of Environmental Impact Assessment Development.
Ong, A. (2011). Introduction: The Art of Being Global. In A. Roy, & A. Ong (Eds.), Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global (pp.1-26). Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444346800.ch
Orderud, G. I., Skogheim, & R., Nordhal, B. I. Review of Brownfield Redevelopment in China and a Comparison within OECD Countries. Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies, 8 (4), 2050022, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345748120500220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345748120500220
Pagano, M. A., Bowman, A. (2000). Vacant Land in Cities: An Urban Resource. Brookings Institution Survey Series, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, 12(1), 1-9.
Qiao, W., Yan, X., & Shao, C. (2014). Evolution and development mechanism of world’s megalopolises. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 138(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.177
Ricklefs, M. C., Lockhart, B., Lua, A., Reyes, P., & Thwin, M. A. (2010). A New History of Southeast Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-01554-9
Roachanakanan, T. (2007). Bangkok Metropolis. Changing Pattern of Uneven Development. Text presented in the Seminar "Prospects of Strategic Development of Major Metropolitan Areas and Regionally Balanced Development in East Asia". Tokyo, 26 February 2007. In Articles in Planning, 2004-2013. Roachanakanan, T. (Ed.). (2013).
Review of town and country planing in Thailand. Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning. Roachanakanan, T. (2008, December 11-13). The Challenge of Land Use Planning. Reducing Urban Flood Risk in Thailand. [Paper presentation]. Sustainable Development to Save the Earth, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sakkayarojkul, O. (2013). An Overview of Spatial Policy in Asian and European Countries. Thailand, Country Profile. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism of Japan [MLITT]. Retrieved August 30,2023, from https://www.mlit.go.jp/kokudokeikaku/international/spw/general/thailand/index_e.html
Sassen, S. (1991). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Schleicher, J., Schaafsma, M., & Vira, B. (2018). Will the Sustainable Development Goals address the links between poverty and the natural environment?. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 34 (1), 43-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.004
Slater, T. (2017). Planetary Rent Gaps. Antipode, 49(S1), 114-137.https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12185
Smith, N. (1979) Toward a Theory of Gentrification: A Back to the City Movement by Capital, not People. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(4), 538-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367908977002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367908977002
Smith, N. (1987). Gentrification and the Rent Gap. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77(3), 462-465.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00171.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00171.x
Stafford-Smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O. et al. (2017). Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustain Science, 12(1), 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3
Sternstein, L. (1986). Plan of Bangkok B.E. 2479 (A.D. 1936). Bangkok, Thailand: Bangkok Metropolitan Administration.
Synder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(1), 333 - 339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Thailand Board of Investment. (2014). Thailand Board of Investment guide on environmental regulations.Retrieved August 30, 2023, from https://www.boi.go.th/upload/content/ENVIRONMENTAL%20.EGULATIONS_28083.pdf
The Economist. (2015). “Development. The 169 commandments. The proposed sustainable development would be worse than useless”. Retrieved August 30th, from 2023,https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21647286-proposed-sustainable-development-goals-would-be-worse-useless-169-commandments.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (n.d.). The 17 goals. Retrieved August 30, 2023, from https://sdgs.un.org/goals
UN-HABITAT. (2003). A better quality of life for all in an urbanizing world. Retrieved July 25, 2023, from https://unhabitat.org/about-us
UN-HABITAT. (2017). About Habitat III. Retrieved July 25, 2023, from https://habitat3.org/the-conference/about-habitat-3
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2002). World Urbanization Prospects.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1).
United Nations. (2017). New urban agenda.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2018). The world’s cities in 2018—Data booklet. Retrieved August 30, 2023, from https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2020/Jan/un_2018_worldcities_databooklet.pdf
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2022). World population prospects 2022: Summary of results. Retrieved August 30, 2023, from https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/wpp2022_summary_of_results.pdf
United Nation Development Programme Global Centre for Technology, Innovation, and Sustainable Development (2021). Handbook on smart urban innovation. Retrived March 30, 2023, from https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2021-11/UNDP-Handbook-on-Smart-Urban-Innovations-V2.pdf
UN-HABITAT. (2020). World cities report 2020 the value of sustainable urbanization. Retrieved August 30, 2023, fromhttps://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/10/wcr_2020_report.pdf
UN-HABITAT. (2022a). World Cities report 2022 envisaging the future of cities. Retrieved August 30, 2023,from https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2022/06/wcr_2022.pdf
UN-HABITAT. (2022b). World cities report 2022 envisaging the future of cities. Retrieved July 25, 2023, from https://unhabitat.org/wcr/
Weber, H. (2014). When goals collide: politics of the MDGs and the post-2015 sustainable development goals agenda. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 34(2), 129-139. In Schleicher et al., (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2014.0026
World Development Indicators. (2023). The World Bank. Retrieved August 30, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.57966/6rwy-0b07
Yusof, R., Mohd Yusof, M. I., Ab Rahman, F. A., & Harsono, D. (2022). Review on Southeast Asian Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) localisation strategies. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(19), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7i19.3260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7i19.3260