Bibliometric Analysis of Publications Related to Sociopetal and Sociofugal Spaces
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Sociopetal and sociofugal spaces are important aspects of urban planning and design. However, no study has examined these spaces systematically, using a bibliometric perspective. This study explored the status of sociopetal and sociofugal spaces through analysis of 869 papers obtained from Google Scholar. This study’s results revealed an increasing number of publications focusing on sociopetal and sociofugal spaces over the last decade. The bibliometric analysis also showed that English was the dominant publication language and ProQuest was the most widely used source (database) for finding the papers. Besides, the most frequent keywords used were “Hall” and “chair.” The most influential document was cited 111,336 times, while the greatest number of publications were produced by Robert Sommer. These results can help architecture, urban design, and environmental psychology professionals gain a comprehensive understanding of sociopetal and sociofugal space and their planning and design implications.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All material is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, unless otherwise stated. As such, authors are free to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The authors must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. The authors may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. The authors may not use the material for commercial purposes. If the authors remix, transform, or build upon the material, they may not distribute the modified material, unless permission is obtained from JARS. Final, accepted versions of the paper may be posted on third party repositories, provided appropriate acknowledgement to the original source is clearly noted.
References
Al Husaeni, D. F., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2021). Bibliometric using vosviewer with publish or perish (using Google Scholar data): From step-by-step processing for users to the practical examples in the analysis of digital learning articles in pre and post Covid-19 pandemic. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(1), 19–46. https://doi.org/10.17509/ajse.v2i1.37368
Askarizad, R., & Safari, H. (2020). The influence of social interactions on the behavioral patterns of the people in urban spaces (case study: The pedestrian zone of Rasht Municipality Square, Iran). Cities, 101, 102687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102687
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Bechtel, R. (1997). Environment and behavior: An introduction. Sage.
Becker, F. (2022). Robert Sommer (1929-2021). American Psychologist, 77(4), 622.
Bergquist, W. (2020). Revisiting COVID-19 policy : A Psychological Perspective on Consideration and Compassion. Library of Professional Psychology. https://library.psychology.edu/revisiting-covid-19-policy-a-psychological-perspective-on-consideration-and-compassion/
Bil, J. S., Buława, B., & Świerzawski, J. (2021). Mental health and the city in the post-COVID-19 era. Sustainability, 13(14), 7533. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147533
Brand, R. (2009). Written and unwritten building conventions in a contested city: The case of Belfast. Urban Studies, 46(12), 2669–2689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009345538
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrara, F. (2011). Science Mapping Software Tools: Review, Analysis, and Cooperative Study Among Tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
Conlon, S. (2009). Proxemics and the novel: An ecological approach. Asian Journal of Literature, Culture and Society, 3(2), 120–149.
Dehkordi, S. T., & Soureshjani, M. H. (2017). From sociopetal to sociofugal: a reverse procedure of Tehran urban spaces. Journal of Urban Design and Mental Health, 3(7).
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Effendi, D. N., Irwandani, Anggraini, W., Jatmiko, A., Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of scientific literacy using VOS viewer: Analysis of science education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1). 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012096
Gandawijaya, R. A. A., Kirana, D. C., & Morika, D. (2021). Study of public seating facilities with behavior and activity approaches on pedestrian street Ir. H. Djuanda Bandung. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 794(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/794/1/012078
Gramigna, R. (2020). Proxemics and “ neo-proxemics ” : The new meaning of space in the time of COVID-19 pandemic, 13, 100-118. https://doi.org/10.15162/1827-5133/1266
Hall, E. T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension. Anchor Book.
Hart, W. (2016). Hall, E dward T. In K. B. Jensen, R. T. Craig, J. D. Pooley & E. W. Rothenbuhler (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy (Vol. 2, pp. 15). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect205
Hoseth, A. (2011). Google scholar. The Charleston Advisor, 12(3), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.5260/chara.12.3.36
Ibekwe, F., Bochi, F., & Martínez-Ávila, D. (2021). Mapping the evolution of topics published by education for information: Interdisciplinary journal of information studies. Education for Information, 37(4), 545–563. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-211559
Ibrahim, F., Harun, W. M. W., & Samad, M. H. A. (2010). The waiting space environment: Perception by design. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3(3), 569–575.
Ihtiyar, T. N., & Yücel, G. F. (2021). Evaluations of urban seating design criteria in case of Zorlu Center and Margi Outlet Malls. CAP-Public Art Journal, 3(1), 72–93. https://journals.ap2.pt/index.php/CAP/article/view/469
Irwin, R. D. (1965). Adaptive behavior and the proxemic study of a small group of severely mentally retarded children [Master’s thesis, Pittsburg State University]. PSU Library Services.
Kaye, S. M., & Murray, M. A. (1982). Evaluations of an architectural space as a function of variations in furniture arrangement, furniture density, and windows. Human Factors, 24(5), 609-618. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088202400511
Kittler, M. G., Rygl, D., & MacKinnon, A. (2011). Beyond culture or beyond control? reviewing the use of hall’s high-/low-context concept. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 11(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595811398797
Lawson, B. (2001). The Language of Space. Architectural Press
Lebensohn, Z. M. (1963). Form and function in the general hospital psychiatric unit. Psychiatric Services, 14(5), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.14.5.245
Lesan, M., & Gjerde, M. (2020). A mixed methods approach to understanding streetscape preferences in a multicultural setting. Methodological Innovations, 13(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799120937233
Liao, H., Tang, M., Luo, L., Li, C., Chiclana, F., & Zeng, X. J. (2018). A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research. Sustainability, 10(1), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010166
Mahima, M., Priya, R. S., Rajagopal, P., & Pradipa, C. (2022). Impact of covid-19 on the built environment. Frontiers in Engineering and Built Environment, 2(2), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/FEBE-09-2021-0040
Mamikutty, R., Aly, A. S., & Marhazlinda, J. (2021). Databases selection in a systematic review of the association between anthropometric measurements and dental caries among children in Asia. Children, 8(7), 565. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8070565
Meagher, B. R., & Marsh, K. L. (2017). Seeking the safety of sociofugal space: Environmental design preferences following social ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JESP.2016.07.004
Mehrabian, A., & Diamond, S. G. (1971). Seating arrangement and conversation. Sociometry, 34(2), 281-289. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2786417
Mehta, V. (2020). The new proxemics: COVID-19, social distancing, and sociable space. Journal of Urban Design, 25(6), 669–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2020.1785283
Monfared, N. S. S., & Yazdanfar, S. A. (2015). Model of Perceptional Concept and related physical principles for participatory local center: Chizar local community in Tehran as a case study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170(27), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.017
Naghiloo, F., & Falahat, M. S. (2016). The effect of environmental factors on sociopetality of urban spaces. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 5(4), 1111–1129. https://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/4761
Overhill, H. (2014). Apple pie proxemics: Edward T. Hall in the kitchen work triangle. Design Issues, 30(2), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00263
Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of science (Wos) and scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
Rogers, E. M., Hart, W. B., & Miike, Y. (2002). Edward T . Hall and The History of Intercultural Communication : The United States and Japan. Keio Communication Review, 24(24), 3–26.
Susanti, W. D., Pranoto, M. S., & W, S. S. Y. (2019). The Study of Public Space From The Sociofugal and Sociopetal Aspect (Case Study: Faculty of Architecture and Design, UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur). Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings, 2018, 75–81. https://nstproceeding.com/index.php/nuscientech/article/view/86/84
Tobing, M. M., & Paembonan, L. S. (2018). Building tourism and sociopetal cultural understanding through proxemics sharing of authentic artefacts from the Tongkonan of North Toraja, Indonesia. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4), 548–554. http://repository.uki.ac.id/id/eprint/1045
Toraman, S., Cox, K., Plano Clark, V. L., & Dariotis, J. K. (2020). Graduate students’ current practices for writing a mixed methods research study abstract: An examination of doctoral dissertation and master’s thesis abstracts in the proQuest dissertations and theses globalTM database. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 12(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.29034/ijmra.v12n1a4
Wang, P., Zhu, F. W., Song, H. Y., Hou, J. H., & Zhang, J. L. (2018). Visualizing the academic discipline of knowledge management. Sustainability, 10(3), 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030682
Weckowicz, T. E. (1957). Notes on the perceptual world of schizophrenic patients. Psychiatric Services, 8(4), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.8.4.25