Role of the National Office of Buddhism (NOB) in Managing the Abandoned Monasteries of Chiang Mai
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of the research are to study roles of the National Office of Buddhism (NOB) with respect to managing the abandoned monasteries of Chiang Mai, and specifically, 1) to identify unsustainable conditions that face abandoned monasteries, 2) to clarify unsustainable ways of thinking about abandoned monasteries , 3) to seek a rental management policy for abandoned monasteries , and 4) to seek management solutions for particular abandoned monasteries . Research problems are raised in relation to the lack of sacred fulfillment within the dead monument approach. Passive management in rental deeds without upgrading quality of life and community member interactions with the monuments indirectly lead to inappropriate conditions of some abandoned monasteries. I suggest that abandoned monasteries be thought of in terms of ‘religious heritages’ rather than ‘historic sites’ to provide multifaceted solutions to the management issues.
There are 948 abandoned monasteries in Chiang Mai, only 8 of them are located in the city walled area. The abandoned monasteries within the old Chiang Mai city walled area, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand were physically examined. In addition to the site surveys of the abandoned monasteries, 33 in-depth interviews were conducted, with 12 interviews focusing on what I term the “official approach” (i.e. with government agencies and key higher education representatives) and 21 interviews focusing on what I term the “local approach” (i.e. with religious leaders and local community members). Secondary data analysis included a review of both Thai and English documents to identify the latest key thinking on management practices for abandoned monasteries. Literature sources analysis and case study analysis are also provided for 8 of the abandoned monasteries in the study area.
Finally, 4 management keys (zoning management, public participation, sustaining of the sacred place condition, and local community ownership) were developed based on identified gaps in the NOB approach to managing abandoned monasteries. It can be concluded that the NOB approach to abandoned monastery deed management should consider 1) revising the ‘dead monument’ concept for hibernated sacred places that leads to unsustainable conditions, 2) the dilemma of the ‘sacred space’ that transitions to the ‘profitable space’ and represents unsustainable ways of thinking, 3) passive action of rental management is an outdated policy, and 4) results of the 4 management keys are supplemental solutions for the particular policy making and promoting sustainability of abandoned monasteries.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All material is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, unless otherwise stated. As such, authors are free to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The authors must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. The authors may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. The authors may not use the material for commercial purposes. If the authors remix, transform, or build upon the material, they may not distribute the modified material, unless permission is obtained from JARS. Final, accepted versions of the paper may be posted on third party repositories, provided appropriate acknowledgement to the original source is clearly noted.
References
Baudrillard, J. (1988). Simulacra and simulations. In F. Poster (Ed.), Jean Baudrillard: Select writings (pp.56-83). Stanford University Press.
Chatizigogas, J. (2003). The challenges in reconciling the requirements of faith and conservation in Mount Athos. In N. Stovel (Eds.), Conservation of living religious heritage (p.72). ICCROM.
FAD. 1989. Theory and conservation guideline for monument and site. Fine Art Department.
Inaba, N. (2003). The Ise shrine and the Gion festival. In H. Stovel, N. Stanley-Price, & R. Kilick, (Eds.) Conservation of living religious heritage (p.24). ICCROM.
Kom Chad Luek. (2007). Kom Chad Luek, 6(1930), 15.
Levi-Strauss, L.(2001). Sacred places and historic cities: Preservation governance and practicalities. In I. Serageldin, E. Shluger, & J. Martin-Brown (Eds.), Historic cities and sacred sites: Cultural roots for urban futures(p.375). The World Bank.
Likert, R. A. (1961). New patterns of management. McGraw-Hill Book.
Magar, V. (2003). Conserving religious heritage within communities in Mexico. In H. Stovel, N. Stanley-Price, & R. Kilick (Eds.), Conservation of living religious heritage. ICCROM.
Mahidol University and Silpakorn University. (1994). Conservation and Management of Old City Environment Project. Bangkok
Nonnette, M. (2001). Strategies for sustainable urban preservation. In I. Serageldin, E.Shluger, & J. Martin-Brown, (Eds.), Historic cities and sacred sites: Cultural roots for urban futures. The World Bank.
Nyathi, P. & Ndiweni, C.B. (2003). A living religious shrine under siege. In H. Stovel, N. Stanley-Price, & R. Kilick (Eds.), Conservation of living religious heritage. ICCROM.
Office of Matichon Dictionary. (2004). Matichon dictionary of the Thai language. Matichon Press.
Parker, P.L. (2001). Sacred sites in traditional American Indian culture. In
I. Serageldin, E. Shluger & J. Martin-Brown (Eds.), Historic cities and sacred sites: Cultural roots for urban futures. The World Bank.
Sekler, E. (2001). Historic cities and sacred sites: Cultural roots for urban futures. In I. Serageldin, E.Shluger, & J. Martin-Brown, (Eds.), Historic cities and sacred sites: Cultural roots for urban futures. The World Bank.
Serageldin, I., Shluger, E., & Martin-Brown, J. (2001). Historic cities and sacred sites: Cultural roots for urban futures. The World Bank.
Shackley, M. (2001). Managing sacred sites. Continuum.
Simeoni, P. E. (2003). Popular worship of the most holy trinity of the Vallepietra, Central Italy. In H. Stovel, N. Stanley-Price, & R. Kilick. Conservation of living religious heritage. ICCROM.
Sorkin, M. (2001). Protecting architectural heritage in expanding metropolises. In I. Serageldin, E. Shluger, & J. Martin-Brown (Eds.), Historic cities and sacred sites: Cultural roots for urban futures (pp. 62,66). The World Bank.
Stovel, H., Stanley-Price, N., & Kilick, R. (2005). Conservation of living religious heritage. ICCROM.
Thaisuntad, T. (2008). Securing a sustainable future for Chiang Mai’s historical ruins: A case study of ten abandoned Wat within the city walls. Graduate School, Silpakorn University.
Wijesuriya, G. (2003). The past is in the present: Perspective in caring for Buddhist heritage sites in Sri Lanka. In H. Stovel, N. Stanley-Price, & R. Kilick (Eds.), Conservation of living religious heritage. ICCROM.
Williams, H. (2001). Historic cities: The sense of place sacred and secular. In I. Serageldin, E. Shluger, & J. Martin-Brown (Eds.), Historic cities and sacred sites: Cultural roots for urban futures. The World Bank.