Cultural Heritage Interpretation of Old Home and Historic House in the Old Town of Nakhon Lampang

Main Article Content

Patiphol Yodsurang
Werapong Wiyati

Abstract




Old home and historic house cultural heritage remain in a large number in the Lampang Old Town. The area representing transformation and development of the past is one of the most popular tourist destinations. A total of 32 sites were identified as a special distinctive cultural property, where were selected as samples in this study. Besides, more than 900 distinctive buildings are influencing the historic urban landscape of Lampang Old Town. Most of them are being modified, adapted, utilized, and enriched with traditional elements in response to tourism economies and contemporary activities based on local-available resources. The two parts of survey was undertaken in research method conducting urban-level rapid survey and site-specific survey based on cultural tourism, cultural heritage, historical urban landscape. sense of place and interpretation of cultural heritage. The result reveals 3 groups of the old home and historic house cultural heritage presenting interpretation patterns as; 1) no interpretation tools, but create sense of urban landscape consisting of residential houses, 2) no interpretation tools, but create sense of the buildings itself and urban landscape consisting of shops, restaurants, accommodation, and offices that are not open to the public, and 3) interpretation tools available, and create sense of the buildings itself and urban landscape consisting of museums and knowledge center that are open to the public. Among those old houses and historic houses, shops, restaurants, accommodation, and offices are found that the visitors can use, access, and interact with various parts of the building over a longer period, without restriction, than in other groups. Thus, this was able to create a sense of place and immense them to the architectural atmosphere of the place. As a result, adaptive reuse of the building to accommodate contemporary tourism and economic activities, it is necessary to consider the availability in utilization of building elements, place, and space that will enhance a better visitor perception in architecture.




Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Bandarin, F. & Roders, A. P. (Eds.). (2019). Reshaping urban conservation: The Historic Urban Landscape Approach in action. Singapore: Springer.

Buranaut, I. (2014). Settlement and Residential Row-House Vernacular Architecture and economy in the historical urban landscape of Kad Kong Ta, Lampang Province. In the proceeding of ICOMOS Thailand International & National Conference 2014: “Historic urban landscapes and heritage: example, approaches & cultural rights”. ICOMOS Thailand: Bangkok.

Camluang, S., & Suwannawaj, S. (2017). Corporate Identity Design by Using Semiotics Theory on the Perception of Cultural Capital. Art and Architecture Journal Naresuan University, 8(1). 24-39.

Center of Thai Inspiration, The. (2015). Study of souvenirs design reflecting Lampang’s identity. “Fak Thai” exhibition. Retrieved from http://www.bundanthai.com/uploads/news/document/20160108172808YXDhRhF. pdf

Chiangchai, N. (2015). The Identity Using to Promote Tourism in Lampang Province. Master’s thesis, Silpakorn University. Retrieved from http://ithesis-ir.su.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/273

Gloag, J. (1977). The architectural interpretation of history. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Hengsadeekul, K. (2010). “Kad Kong Ta” the story of Lampang Old Town. Bangkok: Matichon.

Hodges, S. (2019). Building Peace: The Role of Heritage Interpretation. Public History Review, 26, 1-8. ICOMOS. Recommendations for the analysis conservation and structural restoration of architectural heritage, 2003.

ICOMOS. Charter for the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites, 2008.

ICOMOS. Principles for the analysis, conservation and structural restoration of architectural heritage, 2003a.

Kahle, D & Wickham, H. (2013). ggmap: Spatial Visualization with ggplot2. The R Journal, 5(1), 144-161. Retrieved from http://journal.r-project.org/archive/2013-1/kahle-wickham.pdf

Kirdsiri, K. (2016). The Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape. NAJUA: Architecture, Design and Built Environment, 30, D27-D36.

Khamya, T. (2014). A study on the identify of architecture in Nakhonchum historical community, Amphoe Mueang, Kamphaengphet. Master’s thesis, Silpakorn University. Retrieved from http://www.thapra.lib.su.ac.th/thesis/showthesis_th.asp?id=0000010950

Kudryavtsev, A., Stedman, R.C. & Krasny, M.E. (2012). Sense of place in environmental education. Environmental education research, 18(2), 229-250.

Lorchai, J., Panin, O., and Kerdsiri, K. (2015). Spatial Characteristics in Vernacular Architecture: Approaches to the design of contemporary architecture. Journal of Environment Design. 2(2), 61-78.

Luesinghhnath, N. (2016). Not registered “Chedi” as “an ancient monument “, can be no neglect of duty. PRD Magazine: the government public relations department. 14(1), 1-2. Retrieved from https://www.parliament.go.th/ewtadmin/ewt/parliament_parcy/download/admincourt_journal/everyorganization/14-6.pdf

National Statistical Office. (2014). Lampang Province Statistical Development Plan. Retrieved from http://osthailand.nic.go.th/masterplan_area/

National Statistical Office. (2018). Tourism statistics of Lampang Province 2014 - 2016. Retrieved from http://lampang.old.nso.go.th/main.jsp

Natsupa, C. & Lertvicha, P. (1994). Thai Village Culture. Bangkok: Institute for Rural Development.

Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning. (2019). Boundary Announcement of the Old Town’s area. Retrieved from http://www.onep.go.th/nced/การประกาศขอบเขตพื้นที่-2/

Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning. (2006). Cultural Heritage Atlas of Nakhon Lampang. Bangkok: ET Publishing.

Office of the Royal Society. (2011). Dictionary Royal Academy Edition 2554 B.E. Thailand: Siriwattana Interprint. Ratanasuwongchai,

N. (2011). Cultural Tourism Development Strategies. Manutsayasat Wichakan. 18(1), 31-50. Richards, G. (2018). Cultural tourism: A review of recent research and trends. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 36, 12-21. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.03.005

Riddhagni, N. (2018). Cultural Tourism and Architecture Heritage: Question of Authenticity. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities And Social Sciences), 11(3), 1-12. doi:10.14456/jcdr-hs.2018.9 Silberman, N. (2009). Process not product: The ICOMOS Ename charter (2008) and the practice of heritage stewardship. From the selected works of Neil A. Silberman, July: 7–8. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.

Sirisrisak, T. (2007). Historic Urban Landscape: Interpretation and Presentation of the Image of the City. Paper presented in ICOMOS Thailand International Symposium 2007: Interpretation: From Monument to Living Heritage. 1-3 November 2007.

Tilden, F. (1977). Interpreting Our Heritage. (3rd. Ed) Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press. World Tourism Organization (2019), UNWTO Tourism Definitions. Madrid: UNWTO. Retrieved from https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/book/10.18111/9789284420858

Walker, J. A. & Chaplin, S. (1997). Visual culture: an introduction. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Veverka, A. J. (1994). Interpretive Master Plan. Montana: Falcon Press.

Yodsurang, P. (2011). Architectural heritage interpretation for the Historic City of Ayutthaya [Master’s thesis].

University of Tsukuba.