The Study of Place Identity in Built Environment

Main Article Content

Marisa Hiranteeyakul
Nopadon Thungsakul

Abstract




This article creates a conceptual framework for finding place identity, in terms of theoretical concepts, instruments, and methods. The study has been conducted through a literature review that collects various viewpoints from scholars in anthropresearches payingological, psychological, geographical, and architectural. Such a review also covers many related type of research paying attention to place identity. This is to draw a conceptual framework and methodology for studying place identity in the Thai social context. The study of place identity helps to understand the identity of the created place that is embedded in memory, dynamic inherited, and reproduced until being accepted in society and becoming the spirit of the created place. Finding from this article indicates that there are 2 approaches for research framework either phenomenalism or positivism. The findings also notes that the research tool for the study of place identity is a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, which is adapted to be associated with the Thai context.




Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

1. Audi, R.(Ed.). (1999). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (2nd ed.). NY: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bernardo José, F & Oliveira, P. (2016). Urban neighborhoods and intergroup relations: The importance of place identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45(2016), 239-251.
3. Bernardo, F. (2012). The Role of Place Identity in the Perception, Understanding, and Design of Built Environments.
Bentham Science Publishers. 35-46.
4. Boonprasong, P. (2019). Place Identity in Use Transformation Process of Old Building in The Old Town. The Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS), 16(2). 31-47.
5. Casakin, H., & Bernardo, F. (2012). The role of place identity in the perception, understanding, and design of built environments. [Oak Park, Ill.]: Bentham eBooks. Web site: http://site.ebrary.com/id/10587895.
6. Fungfusaku, A. (2012). Identity: Review of theory and conceptual framework. Bangkok: National Research Council of Thailand.
7. Heidegger, M. (2008). Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: HarperCollins.
8. Johnston, R., Gregory, D., Pratt, G. & Watts, M. (2000). The Dictionary of Human Geography. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Limited.
9. Lhaspajchimanandh, S & Visuddhangkoon, K. (2018). Phenomenological Attitude in Japanese Philosophy. Journal of Human Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Chiang Mai University, 19(1), 179-207.
10. Panin, O. (2011). The transferability of Phuan cultural baggage: from Xieng-Khouang to Thai central region basin. NAJUA: Architecture, Design and Built Environment, 7(1). 133-164.
11. Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K. & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3. 57-83.
12. Rakngam, N. (2016). The concept of local identity in the context of changes in the era of globalization. Nakhon Lampang Buddhist College’s Journal, 5(2). 62-74.
13. Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness, London: Pion Limited.
14. Seamon, D. (2007). A lived hermetic of people and place: phenomenology and space syntax. Web site: http://www.spacesyntaxistanbul.itu.edu.tr
15. Speller, G. (2000). A community in transition: a longitudinal study of place attachment and identity process in the context of an enforced relocation. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Guildford: University of Surrey.
16. Srichannil, C. (2019). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Quality Criteria. Journal of Human Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Chiang Mai University, 20(1), 189-213.
17. Srisaowanunt, A & Inpuntung, V. (2016). Concept of Place and Phenomenology in the Study of Vernacular Architecture. Built Environment Inquiry Journal Faculty of Architecture Khon Kaen University, 15(1). 1-20.
18. Suwatcharapinun, S & Fungfusaku, A. (2012). Phenomenology: Rethinking the Uses of “Root and Identity” in Thai Contemporary Architectural Discourse. Built Environment Research Associates Conference, BERAC 3, 39
19. Thaveeprungsriporn, P. (2011). Kam Kwaam Kít Architecture on architecture theory in the Post Modern. Bangkok: Li-Zenn Publishing.
20. Tuan, Y. (1990). Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perceptions, Attitudes, and Values. New York, United States:
Columbia University Press.
21. Twigger-Ross, C. L., Bonaiuto, M. & Breakwell, G. (2003). Identity theories and environmental psychology. In M. Bonnes, T. Lee & M. Bonaiuto (Eds.), Psychological theories for environmental issues. England: Ashgate Publishing Limited. 203-233.