The Study of Place Identity in Built Environment
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article creates a conceptual framework for finding place identity, in terms of theoretical concepts, instruments, and methods. The study has been conducted through a literature review that collects various viewpoints from scholars in anthropresearches payingological, psychological, geographical, and architectural. Such a review also covers many related type of research paying attention to place identity. This is to draw a conceptual framework and methodology for studying place identity in the Thai social context. The study of place identity helps to understand the identity of the created place that is embedded in memory, dynamic inherited, and reproduced until being accepted in society and becoming the spirit of the created place. Finding from this article indicates that there are 2 approaches for research framework either phenomenalism or positivism. The findings also notes that the research tool for the study of place identity is a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, which is adapted to be associated with the Thai context.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All material is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, unless otherwise stated. As such, authors are free to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The authors must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. The authors may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. The authors may not use the material for commercial purposes. If the authors remix, transform, or build upon the material, they may not distribute the modified material, unless permission is obtained from JARS. Final, accepted versions of the paper may be posted on third party repositories, provided appropriate acknowledgement to the original source is clearly noted.
References
Abdullah, M. (1998). Place Identity: The Visual Image of Saudi Arabian Cities. Habitat International, 22(2), 149-164.
Audi, R.(Ed.). (1999). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (2nd ed.). NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bernardo José, F & Oliveira, P. (2016). Urban neighborhoods and intergroup relations: The importance of placeidentity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 239-251.
Bernardo, F. (2012). The Role of Place Identity in the Perception, Understanding, and Design of Built Environments.UAE: Bentham Science Publishers.
Boonprasong, P. (2019). Place Identity in Use Transformation Process of Old Building in The Old Town. The Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS), 16(2), 31 - 47.
Casakin, H., & Bernardo, F. (2012). The role of place identity in the perception, understanding, and design of built environments. [Oak Park, Ill.]: Bentham eBooks. Retrieved from https://site.ebrary.com/id/10587895.
Dixona,J & Durrheimb, K. (2004). Dislocating identity: Desegregation and the transformation of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 24(4), 455-473.
Erikson, E. H. (1956). Ego identity and psychosocial moratorium. US Children Bureau: Publication nº 356. 1-23.
Fuengfusakul, A. (2003). Identity: Review of theory and conceptual framework. Bangkok: National Research Council of Thailand.
Fitri, M & Triyadi, S. (2015). Community Cultures in Creating the Place-Bound Identity in Musi Riparian, Palembang. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184(May), 394-400.
Heidegger, M. (2008). Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: HarperCollins.
Huovinen, A., Timonen, E., Leino T., & Seppala, T. (2017). Changing urban identities on a discursive map. City, Culture and Society, 11(December), 20-28.
Jacobson-Widding, A. (1983). Identity: Personal and Socio-Cultural : A Symposium. N.J., USA : Humanities Press.
James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York, NY: Holt.
Johnston, R., Gregory, D., Pratt, G. & Watts, M. (2000). The Dictionary of Human Geography. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Limited.
Lewicka, M. (2008). Place Attachment, Place Identity, and Place Memory: Restoring the Forgotten City Past. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(3), 209-231.
Lhaspajchimanandh, S & Visuddhangkoon, K. (2018). Phenomenological Attitude in Japanese Philosophy. Journal of Human Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Chiang Mai University, 19(1), 179-207.
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.Marzano, G. (2015). Using Resource Description Framework (RDF) for description and modeling place identity. Procedia Computer Science, 77, 135-140.
Mueller, A. (2012). Symbols and place identity: A semiotic approach to internal place branding – case study Bremen (Germany). Journal of Place Management and Development, 5(1), 81-92.
Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. London: Academy Editions.
Panin, O. (2011). The transferability of Phuan cultural baggage: from Xieng-Khouang to Thai central region basin. NAJUA: Architecture, Design and Built Environment, 7(1), 133-164.
Plodpluang, U. (2013). Data Analysis in Phenomenology Studies. Nursing Journal of the Ministry of Public Health. 23(2), 1-10.
Proshansky, H. (1978). The self and the city. Environment and Behavior, 10(2), 147-169.
Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K. & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57-83.
Rakngam, N. (2016). The concept of local identity in the context of changes in the era of globalization. Nakhon Lampang Buddhist College’s Journal, 5(2), 62-74.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion Limited.
Rapoport, Amos. (1982). Identity and environment: a cross-cultural perspective, in Housing and Identity: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, edited by James S. Duncan. New York: Holmes and Meier.
Raymond, C. (2013). Review of Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications (Edited by Lynne Manzo and Patrick Devine-Wright). Estudios de Psicología, 34, 345 - 348.
Ross, C. T., Bonaiuto, M., & Breakwell, G. M. (2003). Identity theories and environmental psychology. Psychological Theories For Environmental. Jan2003. 203-234.
Seamon, D. (2007). A lived hermetic of people and place: phenomenology and space syntax. Web site: https://www.spacesyntaxistanbul.itu.edu.tr
Shamai, S. (1991). Sense of place: an empirical measurement. Geoforum 22, 347-358.
Shinbira, I. (2017). Defining place identity: misurata, Libya. Web site: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/47934.
Speller, G. (2000). A community in transition: a longitudinal study of place attachment and identity process in the context of an enforced relocation. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Guildford: University of Surrey.
Srichannil, C. (2019). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Quality Criteria. Journal of Human Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Chiang Mai University, 20(1), 189-213.
Srisaowanunt, A & Inpuntung, V. (2016). Concept of Place and Phenomenology in the Study of Vernacular Architecture. Built Environment Inquiry Journal Faculty of Architecture Khon Kaen University, 15(1). 1-20.
Suwatcharapinun, S. (2012). Re-engaging “Phenomenology in Architecture” rethinking the use of “Root-Identity” and “Units of Analysis. NAJUA: History of Architecture and Thai Architecture. 9(2). 264-283.
Thaveeprungsriporn, P. (2011). Kam Kwaam Kit Architecture on architecture theory in the Post Modern. Bangkok: Li-Zenn Publishing.
Tuan, Y. (1990). Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perceptions, Attitudes, and Values. New York. United States: Columbia University Press.
Ujang, N. (2012). Place Attachment and Continuity of Urban Place Identity. Social and Behavioural Sciences, 49(2). 156–167.
Virasaya, J. (2018). Functionalism in Sociology. Journal Social Science, MCU, 7(2). 260–272.