Place Identity in Use Transformation Process of Old Building in The Old Town

Main Article Content

Peeraya Boonprasong


Understanding of meaning function and recognition in place is essential for developing conceptual framework regarding value assessment in place. This is especially when activities given by meaning of place is impelling physical setting to change in differential ways. This paper is therefore to understand identity function in Use transformation process, a relation of associative meaning conducting between human and physical environment, in which factors contributing to actions dominated by identity function in each stage are expressed. In a Literature review, identity process in the field of psychology, social and architecture are discussed in order to explicate a relation of identity and behavioral expressions through the ethics of architectural conservation. The review found that place-identity in the Use transformation process of old buildings in the old town is sensitively for alteration and is usually damaged from new development. Any application to actions and activities should be considered as a socio-cultural process where is linking to congruence of place among process and town composition e.g. physical environment, activity and use, custom and way of living.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details



American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. (2011). Retrieved November 19 2018 from

Aylward, G. (1979). Conservation and Rehabilitation. London, United Kingdom: Cox & Wyman Ltd.

Boonprasong, P. (2017). USE TRANSFORMATION PROCESS OF SHOPHOUSES: A CASE STUDY OF THA TIEN’S SHOPHOUSE, BANGKOK. (Doctor of Philosophy), Chulalongkorn University, Retrieved March 15, 2018 from

Canter, D. V. (1977). The psychology of place: Architectural Press.

Cheshmehzangi, A., & Heat, T. (2012). Urban Identities: Influences on Socio-Environmental Values and Spatial Inter-Relations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 253-264. Retrieved November 15, 2019 from doi:

Cullen, G. (1961). The Concise Townscape: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

Fisch, R., & Giebeler, G. (2009). Refurbishment Manual: Maintenance Conversions and Extensions. In J. Liese (Ed.): Altusried-Krugzell: Kosel GmbH & Co.KG.

Heidari, A. A., & Mirzaii, S. (2013). Place Identity and its informant parameters in Architectural studies. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences(2013-2-8), 260-268. Retrieved February 18, 2019 from

Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes: Routledge.

ICOMOS (1964). International Charters for the Conservation and restoration of Monuments and Sites: Venice Charters 1964. Retrieved February 1, 2019 from

ICOMOS (1994). The Nara Document on Authenticity 1994. Retrieved February 1, 2019 from

Jenkins, R. (1996). Social identity. London: Routledge.

Jokilehto, J. (2006). World Heritage: Defining the Outstanding Universal Value. City & Time. 2(2)(1), 1-10. Retrieved October 19, 2014 from

Khanjanusthiti, P. (2009). Karn Anurak Moradok Sathapattayakam lae Chomchon [Conservation of Architectural Heritage and Community]: Faculty of Architecture, Chulalongkorn University.

Lynch, K. A. (1960 ). The Image of the City. the United States of America: The Technology Press & Harvard University Press.

Mason, R. (2004). Fixing Historic Preservation: A Constructive Critique of “Significance” [Research and Debate] Places, 16(1), 64-72. Retrieved December 15, 2015 from

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist (C. W. Morris Ed.): University of Chicago Press.

Office of the Royal Society (2007) Retrieved fromอัตลักษณ์-๑๖-มิถุนายน-๒๕

Orbasli, A. (2008). Architectural Conservation: Principles and Practice. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Proshansky, H., Fabian, A., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1), 57-83. Retrieved October 23, 2018 from doi:

Proshansky, H. M. (1976). Environmental psychology and the real world. American Psychologist, 31(4), 303-310. Retrieved October 23, 2018 from doi:

Random House Kernerman Webster’s College Dictionary. (2010). Retrieved November 19 2018 from

Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. 3rd reprint. London:Pion.

Sangsehanat, S. (2018). Reading Urban Identity : Approach to Culture, Landscape and Place. Najua : Architecture, Design and Built Environment, Vol 33 (2018) (January - December, 2018). Retrieved October 3, 2018 from

Shamai, S. (1991). Sense of place: an empirical measurement. Geoforum, 22(3), 347-358. November 19, 2017 from doi:

Taylor, C. (1992). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity: Cambridge University Press.

Tidkorn. (2008). Ekalak - Uttalak. (No.445). Retrieved from City’s Life website: Retrieved Demcember 2, 2018 from

Tiesdell, S., Heath, T., & Oc, T. (1996). Revitalizing Historic Urban Quarters. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.

Twigger-Ross, C. L., & Uzzell, D. L. (1996). Place and Identity Processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 205-220. Retrieved October 13, 2018 from doi:

UNESCO. (2005). Vienna Memorandum on “World Heritage and Contemporary Architecture – Managing the Historic Urban Landscape”. Retrieved September 20, 2018 from

Wendt, A. (1994). Collective Identity Formation and the International State. The American Political Science Review, 88(2), 384-396. Retrieved December 2, 2018 from doi:10.2307/2944711.

WordNet 3.0, Farlex clipart collection. (2003-2008). Retrieved November 19 2018 from

Yaldız, E., & Asatekin, N. G. (2016). Evaluations Of Cultural Perception Performance By Users On The Basis Of Re-Use Of Monumental Building: The Case Of Sivas’ Buruciye Madrasah. Megaron, 11(3), 333-343. Retrieved October 15, 2016 from doi:10.5505/megaron.2016.66487.

Zancheti, S. M., & Jokilehto, J. (1997). Values and Urban Conservation Planning: Some Reflections on Principles and Definitions. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 3(1), 37-51. Retrieved January 24, 2016 from doi:10.1080/13556207.1997.10785179.