The Capacity of Social Enterprises in Driving for Architectural Innovations

Main Article Content

Tapone Nimsawaeng
Singh Intrachooto

Abstract

Successful architectural innovations generally originate from social enterprises. This observation may have impact on strategic management through society-centered methods for managing complex social and environmental issues.


This issue has raised questions in the architecture and construction fields about whether social enterprises are capable of driving for rapid innovative development. Therefore, this research is aimed at studying the capabilities of social enterprises in developing innovations.


This research employed a qualitative research process reinforced by quantitative data analysis. The researcher collected data from related documents to survey architectural achievements receiving world-class awards and gaining acceptance for innovative achievements in order to analyze and determine whether many social enterprises have steered architectural developments to the point where awards were won (indicating innovative achievements).


The awarded businesses are categorized as follows:  1) social enterprises; 2) general businesses and 3) charity organizations.  According to the findings, social enterprises are more capable of leading to innovation development than general business organizations and charity organizations. In particular, proof from the Holcim Awards shows social enterprises to be capable of passing selection rounds and able to win five world-class gold medal awards (100%) from only 65 achievements (30.23%) of 215 achievements entered into the first round of the competition. The findings show the capacity of social enterprises in driving for architectural innovations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Barros, I. (2003). Design Strategy for Innovation and Organizational Effectiveness. Graduate College
of the Illinois Institute of Technology, Doctor of Philosophy in Design. Chicago, Illinois: ProQuest.
Brennan, B. (2010). Muhammad Yunus On Microfinance. Retrieved March 19, 2017, from
www.forbes.com: microfinance/#321d75b0420f
Grameen Bank. (n.d.). Founder: Short Biography. Retrieved April 20, 2017, from
http://www.grameen.com/founder-2/
Keeley, L. (2015). Ten Types of Innovation: The Discipline of Building Breakthroughs (J. Pusumas & S.
Saeung, Trans.). Nonthaburi: IDC.
Kong, E. (2010). Innovation processes in social enterprises: an IC perspective. Journal of Intellectual
Capital, 11, 158-178.
Marketing Oops. (2017). Social business concept revealed. Retrieved June 7, 2018, from
https://www.marketingoops.com/news/biz-news/ptt-social-enterprise/
National Statistics Office Thailand. (2014). Construction industry 2014. Retrieved March 19, 2017, from
http://service.nso.go.th/nso/web/survey/surbus4-1-6.html
Pomerantz, M. (2003). The business of social entrepreneurship in a ‘down economy’. In Business,
25(2), 8-25.
Rahdari, A. Sepasi, S. & Moradi, M. (2015). Achieving sustainability through Schumpeterian social
entrepreneurship: The role of social enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production. 137(2), 347-360.
Trading economics, (2016). Thailand GDP From Construction. Retrieved March 19, 2017, from
www.tradingeconomics.com: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/thailand/gdp-from-
construction/forecast
Tumwongsa, N. (2016). Business and industry trends for 2016-2018: Construction business. Retrieved
March 17, 2017, from www.krungsri.com: https://www.krungsri.com/bank/getmedia/274329bf-
8ca4-48d9-928a-1b292bef2b69/IO_Construction_Contractor_2016.aspx
Youngsuksathaporn, P. (2009). A Fundamental Theory of Innovation. Productivity World, pp. 87-94.