The Aesthetic of Power: A Critical Study on the Politics of Representations at Wat Benchama Bophit and Wat Phra Sri Mahathat, Bangkhen
Main Article Content
Abstract
Despite the decline of theocratic regimes in the modern age, religious structures have continued to
serve the state as a grand symbolic device through associations with divine authorities and spiritual devotions,
as evident from the designs of exquisite churches, mosques, and temples, commissioned by the ruling elites
around the globe. For Siam and Thailand, the practice of erecting such “sacred-cum-secular” architecture
is illustrated by the constructions of Wat Benchama Bophit during King Rama V’s absolutist reign and Wat
Phra Sri Mahathat, Bangkhen after the 1932-democratic revolution. Via discourse and iconographical analyses,
this research presents a critical inquiry on the aforementioned Buddhist temples in Bangkok regarding their
roles in: 1) providing a means of power meditation for the governments; 2) representing a material embodiment
for the creations of national and cultural identities known as Thainess or khwampenthai; and 3) serving
as a strategic tool to implement social policies as well as to prescribe political ideologies for the populaces.
The study also examines the ways in which each building functioned in its socio-political contexts for the
Thais to engage the West and modernity, by utilizing Thainess as a mode of problematization. The upcoming
comparative discussions on both temples aim to further self-reflexive dialogues among power, ideology, Thai
identity, and the built environment, particularly on the formations and revisions of architectural meanings.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All material is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, unless otherwise stated. As such, authors are free to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The authors must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. The authors may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. The authors may not use the material for commercial purposes. If the authors remix, transform, or build upon the material, they may not distribute the modified material, unless permission is obtained from JARS. Final, accepted versions of the paper may be posted on third party repositories, provided appropriate acknowledgement to the original source is clearly noted.
References
Baker, K. M. (1990). Inventing the French Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bhabha, H. (1995). Signs taken for wonders: Questions of ambivalence and authority under a tree outside Delhi, May 1917. In B. Ashcroft, G. Griffits, and H. Tiffin (Eds.), The post-colonial readers. (pp. 24-28). London: Routledge.
Bonta, J. P. (1979). Architecture and its interpretation: A study of expressive systems in architecture. New York: Rizzoli.
Chulalongkorn, King. (1986). พระราชหัตถเลขาพระบาทสมเด็จพระจุลจอมเกล้าเจ้าอยู่หัวพระราชทานแก่เจ้าพระยายมราช (ปั้น สุขุม) [The King Rama V’s correspondence to Chaophraya Yomarat (Pan Sukhum)]. Bangkok: Creamation Volume for Police General Trinit Sukhum, B.E. 2528.
Chungsiriarak. S. (2001). จิตวิญญาณแบบไทยสมัยใหม่: ผลงานสถาปัตยกรรมแบบโมเดิร์นนิสซึ่มของพระพรหมพิจิตร [The spirit of modern Thai: Architectural works in the modernist style by Phra Phrombhichitr]. Muangboran, 27 (January-March), 113-121.
Dovey, K. (1999). Framing places: Mediating power in built forms. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
Herzfeld, M. (2002). The absent presence: Discourses of crypto-colonialism. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 101, 899-926.
Horayangkura, V., et al. (1993).พัฒนาแนวคิดและรูปแบบของงานสถาปัตยกรรม: อดีต ปัจจุบัน และอนาคต [Development of contemporary Thai architecture: Past, present and future]. Bangkok: The Association of Siamese Architects.
Jansen, P. G. (1933). Costruttori e artisti italiani nel Siam. [Italian builders and artists in Siam]. Le vie d’Italia e del mondo, 1(10), 1279-1294.
Jeamteerasakul, S. (2001). ประวัติศาสตร์ที่เพิ่งสร้าง [Recently constructed history]. Bangkok: Hok Tula Rumluek.
Kessing, R. (1989). Creating the past: Custom and identity in the contemporary pacific. Contemporary Pacific, 1(1&2), 19-42.
Ministry of Propaganda. (1936). คู่มือพลเมือง [Handbooks for citizens]. Bangkok, Thailand: Aksonnit.
Ministry of Propaganda. (1942). Prime Minister Plaek Pibulsonggram’s speech on the National Day anniversary, June 24, 1942. Khao Kosanakarn, 5(7).
Nai Hon Huay. (1987). เจ้าฟ้าประชาธิปก ราชันย์ผู้นิราศ [Prajadhipok: The exiled monarch]. Bangkok: Poh Sampand Panich.
National Archives (RV, Ministry of Public Works 1/26). (1901). Ensuing protection of the crumbling bank in front of the Revenue Department and Allegri’s Examination of Protection Methods in Europe (April 11-December 3).
National Archives (Ministry of Education 0701.46/1). (1941a). Relocation for Prara Buddha Sihingsa to the Ordination Ceremony of Lieutenant General Phraya Phahon Phon Phayuhasena (Pote Phahonyothin).
National Archives (Ministry of Education 0701.46/1). (1941b). Request for opinion on the usage of the niches inside the Stupa at Wat Phra Sri Mahathat, Bangkhen on April, 22.
National Archives (Ministry of Propaganda. 0701.22.1/7). (1942). Prime Minister Plaek Pibulsonggram’s speech on the National Day anniversary, June 24, 1942. Bangkok, Thailand.
Nuan la-or, M. (1997). การเมืองไทยยุคสัญลักษณ์ไทย [Thai Politics during the Era of the Thai Symbolism]. Bangkok: Rungruangrat Printing.
Panin, T. (2007). The practice of critical theory in architecture schools: Twenty first century transformation. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies 5(3), 140-150.
Peleggi, M. (2001). Politics of ruins and the business of Nostalgia. Bangkok: White Lotus.
Peleggi, M. (2002). Lords of things: The fashioning of the Siamese Monarchy’s modern image. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Phra Thammakit Sophana (Ed.). (1988). พระพุทธเจ้าหลวงกับวัดเบญจมบพิตร [King Rama V and Benchama Bophit Temple]. Bangkok: Wat Benchama Bophit.
Poshyananda, A. (1992). Modern art in Thailand. Singapore: Oxford University Press.
Prakitnondhakarn, C. (2004). การเมืองและสังคมในศิลปะสถาปัตยกรรม สยามสมัย ไทยประยุกต์ชาตินิยม [Political and social factors in Thai art and architecture]. Bangkok: Matichon.
Prakitnondhakarn, C. (2009). ศิลปะสถาปัตยกรรมคณะราษฎร: สัญลักษณ์ทางการเมืองในเชิงอุดมการณ์ [Arts and architecture of the People’s Party: Symbols of politics and ideologies]. Bangkok: Matichon.
Pramoj, K. M. R. (1985). Opening Speech on Modern Art. In A Proceeding for Seminar on the Post-1932 Art. Bangkok, Thailand: Thai Khadi Research Institute, Thammasat University, 2-14.
Reynolds, C. J. (Ed.). (2002). National identity and its defenders. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books.
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Penguin Books.
Spivak, G. (1995). Can the subaltern speak?: Speculations on widow sacrifice. In B. Ashcroft, G. Griffits, and H. Tiffin (Eds.), The post-colonial readers (pp. 29-35). London: Routledge.
Tambiah, S. J. (1976). World conqueror and world renouncer: A study of Buddhism and polity in Thailand against historical background. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tourism Authority of Thailand. Wat Benchama Bophit. Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://www.tourismthailand.org/attraction/bangkok-10-3176-1.html
Wat Benchama Bophit Dusitvanaram. The Ordination Hall. Retrieved September 4, 2010, from http://www.watbencha.com/history/uposatha-e.html
Wat Benchama Bophit Fair. (1970, December 14). Bangkok Times.
Winichakul, T. (1994). Siam mapped: A history of the geo-body of a nation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Wyatt, D. (1994). Interpreting the history of the fifth reign. In Studies in Thai History. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books.
Wyatt, D. (2004). Thailand: A short history (2nd ed.). Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books.