Planning Interaction – Lessons from a Comparative Study of Bottom-up Approach in Practice
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
It has often been that an operation of development planning process approaches to an unfortunate
dilemma, especially in public affairs. The uprising ideological contrast brings on a vacancy that each development
agent cannot accomplish its own will. The author portrays the planning stake in public affairs that each stakeholder
has proceeded to the aforementioned crosscutting dialogue based on two case studies. The paper aims
twofold. The first is to reveal the discursive struggle of ideological yardstick posited by each agent that undergoes
both explicit and implicit controversies. The second is to mirror each effort to grasp and to redefine the development
discourse as well as to reconcile toward an effective operation/outcome. It is discovered that without a reconciliatory
agent, the anticipated dialogue cannot be attained. Nevertheless, the entailed resolution will temporarily sound.
Only the superior coercion will eventually last, although at best, some prior controversial propositions have
been either more or less mitigated or, at worst, they have been unvoiced ever.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All material is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, unless otherwise stated. As such, authors are free to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The authors must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. The authors may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. The authors may not use the material for commercial purposes. If the authors remix, transform, or build upon the material, they may not distribute the modified material, unless permission is obtained from JARS. Final, accepted versions of the paper may be posted on third party repositories, provided appropriate acknowledgement to the original source is clearly noted.
References
ปฏิสัมพันธ์ของการวางแผน-บทเรียนจากการศึกษาเปรียบเทียบ ในปฏิบัติการวางแผนจากล่างสู่บน
Bailey, N. (2005). Transformation or bureaucratization? The changing role of community representation in local strategic partnerships in England. Journal of Civil Society, 1(2), 147-162.
Bangsaothong Municipality. (2003). ขอม ้ ลพ ู นฐานเทศบาลตำบลบางเสาธง ้ื [Basic information of the Bangsaothong Municipality] (Mimeographed). Samut Prakran, Thailand.
Bangsaothong Municipality. (2006a). แผนยทธศาสตร ุ พ์ ฒนาเทศบาลตำบลบางเสาธง ั (2549-2551) [Development strategic plan for Bangsaothong Municipality] (Mimeographed). Samut Prakran, Thailand.
Bangsaothong Municipality. (2006b). วารสารแนะนำเทศบาลตำบลบางเสาธง [The introduction of Bangsaothong Municipality]. Samut Prakarn, Thailand: Banpoonam.
Carroll, T. F. (1992). Intermediary NGOs: The supporting link in grassroots development. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
Chanthornsorn, W. (2003). ทฤษฎการนำนโยบายสาธารณะไปปฏ ี บิ ตั ิ [An integrated theory of public policy implementation]. Bangkok, Thailand: Thai University Research Association.
Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1992). Scaling-up the development impact of NGOs: Concept and experiences. In M. Edwards & D. Hulme (Eds.), Making a difference: NGO and development in a changing world (p. 24).
London: Earthscan.
Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Fotopoulos, T. (1997). Towards an inclusive democracy: The crisis of the growth economy and the need for a new liberatory project. London: Cassell Continuum.
Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Friedmann, J. (1992). Empowerment. Oxford: Blackwell.
Friedmann, J. (1998). Planning theory revisited. European Planning Studies, 6(3), 245.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented society. London: Palgrave.
Innes, J. E. (1996). Planning through consensus building. Journal of American Planning Association, 62(4), 460. Innes, J. E., Gruber, J., Neuman, M., & Thompson, R. (1994). Coordinating growth and environmental management through consensus-building. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
John, P. (1998). Analysing public policy. London: Pinter.
Kelly, S. B. (2004). Community planning: How to solve urban and environmental problem. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.
Manor, J. (2004). Democratisation with inclusions: Political reforms and people’s empowerment at the grassroots. Journal of Human Development, 5(1), 25.
Mongkolnchaiarunya, J. (2005). Promoting a community-based solid-waste management initiative in local government: Yala Municipality, Thailand. Habitat International, 29, 27-40.
Office of Policy and Planning, Suphan Buri Province. (2006) ยทธศาสตร์การพัฒนจังหวัดสุพรรณบุรี (2547-2550) [Development strategy for policy and planning, Suphan Buri Province (2004-2007)]. Retrieved February 13, 2008, from http://www.suphanburi.go.th/Strategic.doc
Ritsamret, S. (2001). การมีส่วนร่วมของประชาชนในการจัดการขยะมูลฝอย: ศึกษาเฉพาะกรณี ของชุมชนในเขตเทศบาล ตำบลบางเสาธง อำเภอบางเสาธง อำเภอบางพลี จังหวัดสมุทรปราการ. [People participation in solid waste management: A case study of community in Bangsaothong Municipality, Samut Prakarn]. Master Thesis, Faculty of Political Science and Law, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand.
Samut Prakarn Province. (2003). Environmental database. Retrieved February 1, 2005, from http://www.samutprakan.go.th/Base_25/data_25-01.htm
Sandercock, L. (1998). Towards cosmopolis. New York: Wiley.
Sapu, S., Usavagovitwong, N., & Jirawatthavee, M. (2007). กระบวนการขับเคลื่อนกลไกชุมชนท้องถิ่นในมิติ ของการอนุรักษ์ประวัติศาสตร์: กรณีย่านตลาด 100 ปีสามชุก จังหวัดสุพรรณบุรี [Community mobilization in local heritage conservation: A case of Samchuk old market district, Suphanburi] (Research report). Bangkok, Thailand: Chumchonthai Foundation.
Sapu, S., & Usavagovitwong, N. (2007). Driven-mechanism for local heritage conservation: Samchuk old market district, Suphanburi, Thailand. In G. Arun, Proceedings of International Symposium on Studies on Historical Heritage (pp. 213-220). Antalya, Turkey, 213-220.
Senanuch, P. (2001). โครงการวิจัยและปฏิบัติการเรื่องพัฒนาชุมชนแออัดและองค์กรชุมชนแออัดในเมือง: กรณีศึกษาชุมชนเมืองใหม่ บางพลี [Action research for urban poor development and its community-based organization: A case of Bangplee newtown community] (Mimeographed). Bangkok, Thailand: The Crown Property Bureau.
Stiftel, B. (2000). Planning theory. In R. Palaseyed (Ed.), The national AICP examination preparation course guidebook 2000 (p. 5). Washington: AICP.
Usavagovitwong, N. (2007a). Community-based solid waste management in Bang Plee Newtown Community, Samut Prakarn Province, Thaniland. Bangkok, Thailand: CIDA-AIT Partnership.
Usavagovitwong, N. (Ed.). (2007b). ยานตลาดร้อยปีสามชุกกับกลไกชุมชนในมิติการอนุรักษ์ [Samchuk: A centennial market district and community mobilization in conservation]. Bangkok, Thailand: Chumchonthai Foundation.
Usavagovitwong, N., & Jongpukdee, S. (2005). ความร่วมมือของผู้มีส่วนได้เสียเพื่อการฟื้นฟูที่ว่างสาธารณะเพื่อการนันทนาการของชุมชนนิคมอุตสาหกรรม กรณีศึกษา: โครงการเมืองใหมี บางพลี วาระที่ 1 [The collaboration of stakeholders for neighborhood open space revitalization of industrial estate community: The case of Bang Plee New Town 1st phase. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies, 3, 185-205.
Uwanno, B. (2005). การมส่วนร่วมในกระบวนการด้านสิ่งแวดล้อม: เทคนิคและวิธีการที่เหมาะสมในบริบทสังคมและวัฒนธรรมไทย [Environmental participatory process: Appropriated technique and approach in Thai’s socio-cultural context]. In S. Walaisathein (Ed.), ธรรมาภิบาลการมส่วนร่วมของประชาชน ่ และกระบวนการทางด้านสิ่งแวดล้อม [Good governance, participation, and environmental process] (p. 43). Bangkok, Thailand: Saitarn.