Space as a Place for Social Interaction: A Case Study of Tai-Lao Communities

Main Article Content

Sutida Sattayakorn

Abstract

Regarding the social aspects of sustainable community design, the consideration of public space
should aim to support collaboration and social cohesion. As the Tai-Lao ethnic group in central Thailand have
been able to maintain their cultural identity and strong neighbourhood relationships, a lesson can be learned
from traditional communities about the adaptability of public space concerning social activities. This study
investigates the interrelationships between physical space and social interaction within Tai-Lao communities in
the central regions of Thailand and Luang Prabang, Laos, using qualitative field research. Adaptation to the
dominant culture and local development have brought changes to the physical features and utilization of
space, as well as changes in terms of its roles, values, and meanings which respond to different forms and
levels of social activity. Among a number of factors, social interaction is closely interconnected with the physical
settings of space, though the psychological meaning often plays a more important role. The interpretation of
adaptability in the physical structure of “Laan Klang Baan”, a public area within Lao Krang villages that still
maintains its meaning and spirit as a shared place, can be reconciled to maintain values of social contact and
to improve communal social cohesion by emphasizing a notion of place that represents psychological meaning
and belief.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Chinat Cultural Office. (2011). Taam Ha Lao Krang Tee Kudjok. Chinat, Thailand: Chinat Cultural Office. Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions [DETR]. (2000). Planning Policy Guidance Note 3: Housing. London: Author.

Fleming, R., Baum, A., & Singer, J. E. (1985). Social support and the physical environment. In S. Cohen & S. L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health. Orlando, FL.: Academic Press.

Gehl, J. (2001). Life between buildings: Using public space. Copenhagen, Arkitektens Forlag: The Danish Architectureal Press.

Inpuntung, V., Kasemsook, A., Panin, O., & Chaturawong, C. (2006). โลกของชาวไทดำ: ความสัมพันธ์ซึ่งกันระหว่างสภาพแวดล้อมที่อยู่อาศัยของชาวไทดำในไทยและเวียดนาม [Final Report of The world of Tai Dam: The relationship between living environments of Tai Dam in Thailand and Vietnam]. Bangkok, Thailand: Silpakorn University.

Khan, M. A. (1995). Sustainable development: The key concepts, issues and implications. Sustainable Development, 3, 63-69.

Lewis, S. (Ed.). (2005). Front to back: A design agenda for urban housing. Oxford: Architectural Press.

Panin, O., et al. (2010). First year progress report of holistic study for the adaptability in the different context of Tai-Lao ethnic in the central region basin of Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: Kasetsart University, Thailand Research Fund and Office of the Higher Education Commission.

Pinibjvarasin, W. (2010). บริบทและการปรับตัวของชาวลาวเวียง [Context and Adaptability of Lao Vieng]. In Panin, O., et al. (Eds.). First year progress report of holistic study for the adaptability in the different context of Tai-Lao ethnic in the central region basin of Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: Kasetsart University, Thailand Research Fund and Office of the Higher Education Commission.

Piyapan, B. (1998). ลาวในกรุงรัตนโกสินทร์ [Laotians in the Rattanakosin period]. Bangkok, Thailand: Thailand Research Fund.

Punpairoj, P. (2011). ไทดำรำพันถึงเรือนกระดองเต่า: จากขุนเขาเมืองแถงสู่ลุ่มน้ำภาคกลางของไทย [Tai Dam's longing for tortoise shaped houses: From the highlands of Muang Thaeng to the river basins of Thailand]. Journal of Architecture/Planning Research and Studies, 8(1), 21-34.

Thorns, D. C. (2004). Creating sustainable housing: The challenge of moving beyond environmentalism to new models of social development. Social Science Research Centre, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.