A Study of Components and Guidelines for Monitoring and Evaluation of Student Support System Operations under Roi Et Primary Educational Service Area Office 3
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to 1) study the components of monitoring and evaluating the student support system and 2) study the guidelines for monitoring and evaluating the student support system under the Roi Et Primary Educational Service Area Office 3. The target group consisted of 422 school administrators and teachers responsible for the student support system from 211 schools, selected using stratified random sampling and simple random sampling within each stratum. The instruments used included a component assessment form and a semi-structured interview. The statistics used were mean, frequency, percentage, standard deviation, and content analysis.
The research findings revealed that 1) the monitoring and evaluation components of the student support system consist of four elements: context, input, process, and outcome, with a total of 15 sub-components; and 2) the monitoring and evaluation guidelines should be implemented by all stakeholders, covering all four components, using a systemic approach consistent with the policies of the supervising agency. Furthermore, the components evaluated for appropriateness by five experts had an overall average score at the highest level ( =4.68, S.D.=0.47). These research findings provide important data for developing future monitoring and evaluation models.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in articles in the Journal of Arts of Management It is the responsibility of the author of the article. and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team I agree that the article is copyright of the Arts and Management Journal.
References
Alkin, M. C. (1969). Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of instructional programs. University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation of Instructional Programs.
Chareerak, W. (2021). The new and efficient monitoring and evaluation model development for policy implementation of the Office of the Basic Education Commission. ThaiEdResearch. http://www.thaiedresearch.org/home/paperview/2415/?
Cronbach, L. J. (1963). Course improvement through evaluation. Teachers College Record, 64(8), 1–13.
Department of Mental Health. (2001). Handbook for Student Care and Support System Advisors. Mental Health Center, Department of Mental Health.
Goodman, R., Ford, T., Simmons, H., Gatward, R., & Meltzer, H. (2000). Using the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDG) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 534-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.177.6.534
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (2015). The social psychology of organizations. Routledge.
Laudom, T. (2025). Administration of the student care and support system for the promotion of sustainable education. Journal of Innovation in Educational Administration and Management, 3(3), 135–147. https://so11.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IAEM/article/view/2159/947
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2008). Guidelines for the operation of the Educational Evaluation and Supervision Committee. Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand.
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2016). Student care and support system (9th ed.). National Office of Buddhism Printing Press.
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. (2019). National Strategy 2018–2037. Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board.
Provus, M. (1971). Discrepancy evaluation: For educational program improvement and assessment. McCutchan.
Roi Et Primary Educational Service Area Office 3. (2023). Annual Operational Report 2023. Roi Et Primary Educational Service Area Office 3.
Secretariat of the Senate. (2017). Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, B.E. 2560. Secretariat of the Senate.
Sibley, E., Theodorakakis, M., Walsh, M. E., Foley, C., Petrie, J., & Raczek, A. E. (2017). The impact of comprehensive student support on teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 145–156. DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.012
Stake, R. E. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 68, 23–540.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 5, 19-25.
Suntornmaneerat, D. (2017). Status and problems of student support system in schools under Khon Kaen educational service area office 1–5. Research and Development Journal, Loei Rajabhat University, 8(24), 45–55. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/researchjournal-lru/article/view/101168/78512
Thongduang, S. (2022). The model for operation of student care and support system. Journal of Buddhist Philosophy Evolved, 6(2), 367–380. https://ojs.mbu.ac.th/index.php/jbpe/article/view/1930/1262
Uthranan, S. (2021). Techniques for systematic teaching and learning management. Mitsiam Printing House.
