Learning Beliefs and Blended Learning Engagement among Vocational College Students: The Mediating Role of Technology Acceptance
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines how learning beliefs—specifically growth mindset (GM) and ICT self-efficacy (ICTSE)—influence blended learning engagement (BLE) among vocational college students in Chongqing, China, through the mediating mechanisms of perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PU) within the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Three objectives guided the study: (1) to examine the direct effects of GM and ICTSE on BLE and of GM on ICTSE; (2) to determine the mediating roles of PEOU and PU, including serial mediation effects; and (3) to construct and validate an integrated “Learning Beliefs → TAM → BLE” model. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 608 students across six vocational colleges in Chongqing, using two-stage stratified sampling. Data were analyzed via hierarchical regression and structural equation modeling (SEM) in SPSS and AMOS. All 14 hypotheses were supported. GM and ICTSE both positively predicted BLE, with ICTSE exerting a stronger direct effect; GM significantly predicted ICTSE, establishing mindset as foundational to technology confidence. PEOU and PU functioned as significant mediators, including a novel four-step serial chain (GM → ICTSE → PEOU → PU → BLE). Critically, GM operated predominantly through indirect pathways (67.9% of total effect), whereas ICTSE exerted a stronger direct influence (61.1%)—revealing qualitatively distinct psychological mechanisms. The integrated model achieved excellent fit and explained 46.9% of BLE variance. These findings advance the theoretical integration of implicit theory, social cognitive theory, and TAM, and offer a validated framework for designing belief- and technology-targeted interventions in vocational education.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in articles in the Journal of Arts of Management It is the responsibility of the author of the article. and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team I agree that the article is copyright of the Arts and Management Journal.
References
Al-Adwan, A. S., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G. A., Albelbisi, N. A., & Habibi, A. (2023). Extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) to predict university students’ intentions to use metaverse-based learning platforms. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 15381–15413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3
Ariff, M. S. M., Yun, L. O., Zakuan, N., & Ismail, K. (2012). The impacts of computer self-efficacy and technology acceptance model on behavioral intention in internet banking systems. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 57, 448–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1210
Baber, H. (2021). Modelling the acceptance of e-learning during the pandemic of COVID-19: A study of South Korea. International Journal of Management in Education, 19(2), 100503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100503
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 389-444). Allyn & Bacon.
Burnette, J. L., Billingsley, J., Banks, G. C., Knouse, L. E., Hoyt, C. L., Pollack, J. M., & Simon, S. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of growth mindset interventions: For whom, how, and why might such interventions work?. Psychological Bulletin, 149(3–4), 174–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000368
Chen, J., Wei, S., Zhou, X., Yao, J., & Tang, S.-K. (2024). OGPA: A novel indicator hinting at the academic performance of Chinese vocational college students using stepwise regression. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1433021. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1433021
China Higher Education Society. (2023). Annual report on higher vocational education development in China 2023. China Higher Education.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2023). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (5th ed.). Wiley.
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211. https://doi.org/10.2307/249688
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Deng, C., Peng, J., & Li, S. (2022). Research on the state of blended learning among college students: A mixed-method approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1054137. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1054137
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
Feng, L., He, L., & Ding, J. (2023). The association between perceived teacher support, students' ICT self-efficacy, and online English academic engagement in the blended learning context. Sustainability, 15(8), Article 6839. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086839
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Getenet, S., Cantle, R., Redmond, P., & Albion, P. (2024). Students’ digital technology attitude, literacy and self-efficacy and their effect on online learning engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00437-y
Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Pearson Prentice.
Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2023). Blended learning research perspectives (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Hatlevik, O. E., Throndsen, I., Loi, M., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2018). Students’ ICT self-efficacy and computer and information literacy: Determinants and relationships. Computers & Education, 118, 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.011
International Labour Organization. (2023). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2023. ILO. https://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/weso/WCMS_865332/lang--en/index.htm
Isaac, O., Abdullah, Z., Ramayah, T., & Mutahar, A. M. (2017). Internet usage, user satisfaction, task-technology fit, and performance impact among public sector employees in Yemen. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34(3), 210–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-11-2016-0051
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). Guilford.
Li, H. (2023). Perceived teacher-student relationship and growth mindset as predictors of student engagement in foreign language learning: The mediating role of foreign language enjoyment. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1177223. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177223
Li, S., Kwok, S. W. H., Siu, S. C. N., Chung, J. Y. S., Lam, H. C. Y., Tsang, E. Y. M., Li, K. C., Yeung, J. W. Y., & Lam, S. C. (2023). Development of generic student engagement scale in higher education: An application on healthcare students. Nursing Open, 10(3), 1545–1555. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1405
Lohr, S. L. (2021). Sampling: Design and analysis (3rd ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Ma, W., Yang, W., & Bu, Q. (2024). Interconnected factors in EFL engagement: Classroom climate, growth mindset, and achievement goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1353360. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1353360
Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security of China. (2024). Top 100 most in-demand occupations in Q4 2023. MOHRSS. http://www.mohrss.gov.cn
National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2024). Communiqué of the fifth national economic census. NBS. http://www.stats.gov.cn
Nur, T., & Joviando, J. (2021). Determination of e-wallet usage intention: Extending the TAM model with self efficacy. In 2021 3rd International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System (ICORIS) (pp. 1–7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icoris52787.2021.9649568
Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2022). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome — A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.005
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Rammstedt, B., Grüning, D. J., & Lechner, C. M. (2022). Measuring growth mindset: A validation of a three-item scale and a single-item scale in youth and adults. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 40, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000735
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
World Economic Forum (WEF). (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. WEF. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805
Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., Tipton, E., Schneider, B., Hulleman, C. S., Hinojosa, C. P., Paunesku, D., Romero, C., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Iachan, R., Buontempo, J., Yang, S. M., Carvalho, C. M., Hahn, P. R., Gopalan, M., Mhatre, P., Ferguson, R., Duckworth, A. L., & Dweck, C. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364-369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y