Assessing Public Sector Innovation Outcomes in Managing Seawater Intrusion into the Songkhla Lagoon Basin and Recurrently Affected Agricultural Areas
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims to assess the outcomes of public sector innovations in addressing the problem of seawater intrusion into lakes and repetitive agricultural land in the Songkhla Lagoon Basin. A qualitative research approach, utilizing the Delphi technique, was employed in this study. Data was collected from 14 experts through questionnaires, and the analysis focused on determining the level of agreement between the experts. The research findings revealed that the results of public sector innovations in addressing the problem of seawater intrusion into lakes and repetitive agricultural land in the Songkhla Lagoon Basin are considered a strength of the problem-solving efforts in terms of effectiveness. This strength stems from the influence of cooperation and synergy between the government and the people. However, in terms of efficiency, the experts rated the results as negative because the problem-solving efforts incurred human costs, especially the reliance on highly skilled personnel to tackle the problem. In terms of formulating new policies, experts believe that public sector innovations in addressing the issue of seawater intrusion into lakes and repetitive agricultural land in the Songkhla lagoon basin have not led to the development of new policies due to the continued influence of traditional bureaucratic administration. The same applies to aspects of organizational innovation and security, where experts concluded that public sector innovations in combating seawater intrusion and recurrent agricultural land in the Songkhla Lagoon Basin have not been able to bring about long-term changes. At the same time, the changes that have occurred are seen as merely short-term.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in articles in the Journal of Arts of Management It is the responsibility of the author of the article. and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team I agree that the article is copyright of the Arts and Management Journal.
References
Alazmi, M. S., & Al-Kubaisi, H. S. (2020). School principals’ perceptions on the diversification of school financing sources: A study using Delphi method. Management in Education, 34(3), 94-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020619897372
Alon, I., Haidar, H., Haidar, A., & Guimón, J. (2025). The future of artificial intelligence: Insights from recent Delphi studies. Futures, 165, 103514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2024.103514
Alteneiji, A. O. M. A. A., Tipu, S. A. A., & Sarker, A. E. (2025). Linking antecedents, processes, and outcomes of public sector innovation: A Complexity theory perspective. International Review of Management and Marketing,15(1), 330-339. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.17542
Birati, S., Amanipoor, H., & Battaleb-Looie, S. (2025). Investigation of the impact of seawater intrusion on the agricultural land quality along river margins. Applied Water Science, 15(65), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-025-02392-7
Cao, X., Guo, Q., & Liu, W. (2024). Research on the patterns of seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers induced by sea level rise under the influence of multiple factors. Water, 16(23), 3457. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16233457
Elshaarawy, M. K., & Armanuos, A. M. (2025). Predicting seawater intrusion wedge length in coastal aquifers using hybrid gradient boosting techniques. Earth Science Informatics, 18(243). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-01755-7
Haley, B. (2016). Getting the institutions right: designing the public sector to promote clean innovation. Canadian Public Policy, 42(S1), S54-S66. https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2016-051
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: past and present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34.
Khalthong, N. (2021). Research on enhancing water management capability through IoT technology for rice farmers in Sathing Phra and Singhanakhon District, Songkhla Province. Fundamental Fund and Program Management Unit on Area Based Development.
Li, Y. (2021). A framework in analysing the strategies for governing innovation networks for Public Innovation. Policy Studies, 42(2), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1618809
Liu, H., Gao, L., Ma, C., & Yuan, Y. (2023). Analysis of the seawater intrusion process based on multiple monitoring methods: study in the Southern Coastal Plain of Laizhou Bay, China. Water, 15(11), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15112013
Maharani, D., & Andhika, L. R. (2021). Rational intervention public policy for public service innovation. Policy & Governance Review, 5(2), 182-194. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v5i2.383
Mondal, P., Sarupria, M., & Walter, M. (2025). Chapter five - A global review of the impacts of saltwater intrusion on soils and ecosystems. Advances in Agronomy 191, 239-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2025.01.002
Moore, M. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University.
Mulhuijzen, M., & de Jong, J. P. J. (2025). The household sector innovation ecosystem: A framework and policy implications. Technovation, 5, 103268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103268
Ongaro, E., Gong, T., & Jing, Y. (2021). Public administration, context and innovation: A framework of analysis. Public Administration and Development, 40(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1902
Osborne. S. P. (1998). Voluntary organizations and innovation in public service. Routledge.
Palwisut, P., Junkorn, A., & Rodjan, M. (2020). Saltwater intrusion forecast system for Thachin river using multilayer perceptron neural network. Information Technology Journal, 16(1), 60-68.
Raghavan, A., Demircioglu, M. A., & Orazgaliyev, S. (2025). Can VUCA events catalyze digital public sector innovations? Evidence from three digital innovation trends in Asia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(2), 100529.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100529
Takata, S., & Hidaka, K. (2025). New public-private partnership based on the interactive collaboration in the space sector. Acta Astronautica, 231, 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.02.009
Tang, Y., Lu, C., & Luo, J. (2025). Analytical solutions for seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers with spatially variable recharge. Journal of Hydrology, 659, 133232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133232
Tarabichi, H., Schildt, H., & Kodeih, F. (2025). Public sector innovation through nested experimental spaces: Reinventing the immigrant integration system. Research Policy, 54(6), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105255
Wang, N., & Ge, J. (2025). Predictions of saltwater intrusion in the Changjiang Estuary: Integrating machine learning methods with FVCOM. Journal of Hydrology, 653, 132739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132739
Williams, M. J., & Yecalo-Tecle. L. (2020). Innovation, voice, and hierarchy in the civil service: Evidence from Ghana’s civil service. Governance, 33(4), 789-807. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12472
Yen, B. T. H., & Pisa, N. (2025). Workshop 4 Report: The use of technological innovation for achieving sustainable public transport outcomes. Research in Transportation Economics. 112, 101575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101575
Zhao, S., Su, X., & Zhang, W. (2025). Numerical simulation of thermal effects on seawater intrusion management by coastal cutoff walls. Journal of Environmental Management, 381, 125262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125262