The Perspective of Education as Philosophy Changing Acceptation as Buddhist Peaceful Means
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article of research has aimed to reflex the dimensions of education that was changed from the past to the present. By the lecturers have points of view and the method to be different each era as well as to be shifted the evolution of role that has been one of characteristic of teachers or lecturers who should be an honesty, open – mind and acceptation for changing to be happen. Not only the development but also the technology, the open mind for accepting the paradigm shift of society rapidly. The communicative language of learners that has been strange and different, including, the expression of opinion each points of view in context of Thai people may have culture to be frame that makes the learners to be able to express the ideas not as much as. On the other hand, the learners in the Western, dare to express their ideas more. It was shown that the acceptation, the open mind of thought about transiting knowledge to make the learners’ expression between Eastern and Western to be different clearly. However, the instructors have been important to make the learners how to brave and to do. In philosophical terms, “Education is Growth” (Saroj Bousri, 2006). It could develop people to be the human perfectly by using transit knowledge to the learners in order to understand core of education which has been the teaching actually.
The results of study were found that the instructors, the learners and curriculum were the main components of educating structure based on changing of digital world era. From this now, The learning has been inessential to be in classroom or institution anymore. So, for adjusting both learners and instructors have been the most important. For other programs and online media to be used tools of learning into educating perspective to involve in Buddhist Peaceful Means to be changing acceptation as well as to replace the past with equitable.
Article Details
Views and opinions appearing in articles in the Journal of Arts of Management It is the responsibility of the author of the article. and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team I agree that the article is copyright of the Arts and Management Journal.
References
ประเวศ วะสี. (2550). การเรียนรู้ใหม่ไปให้พ้นวิกฤติแห่งยุคสมัย. กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์ร่วมด้วยช่วยกัน.
ปรียาพร วงศ์อนุตรโรจน์. (2546). จิตวิทยาการศึกษา. กรุงเทพฯ: พิมพ์ดี.
วิชัย วงศ์ใหญ่. (2539). กระบวนการทัศน์ใหม่ในนวัตกรรมหลักสูตร: ข่าวสารกองบริการการศึกษากรุงเทพฯ: ทบวงมหาวิทยาลัย.
วิทย์ วิศทเวทย์. (2555). ปรัชญาทรรศน์: ปรัชญาการศึกษา. กรุงเทพฯ: จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
สาโรช บัวศรี. (2549). การศึกษาและจริยธรรมศาสตราจารย์ ดร.สาโรช บัวศรี. กรุงเทพฯ: มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ.
อภิญญา เฟื่องฟูสกุล. (2546). อัตลักษณ์. คณะกรรมการสภาวิจัยแห่งชาติ สาขาสังคมวิทยา. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักงานคณะกรรมการวิจัยแห่งชาติ.
Good. C.V. (1973). Dictionary of Education. New York: McGraw – Hill Company.
McNeil, J. (1975). The Psychology of Being Human. San Francisco. California: Canfield Press.
Miller, R. (2000). Making Connections to the World: some Thoughts on Holistic Curriculum. Brandon, VT: Foundation for Educational Renewal.