Dowry Culture in Chinese Society: Symbolic and Gender Implications
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the persistence and transformation of dowry culture in contemporary Chinese society, focusing on how dowry practices reflect and reinforce gender roles and power relations, and how they function as a culturally embedded system of social exchange between families. Drawing on Bronislaw Malinowski’s analysis of the Kula Ring and Victor Turner’s theory of symbolism, the study conceptualizes dowry as a ritualized exchange situated within gender relations and kinship structures. A qualitative research design integrates a literature review, case analysis, and semi-structured interviews. Ten key informants were selected through purposive sampling, including married couples, parents, and young adults preparing for marriage. The findings indicate that dowry continues to serve as a symbolic expression of marital commitment and familial obligation, while sustaining social relationships and affirming family prestige. Its significance extends beyond material value to encompass the negotiation of social expectations, gendered responsibilities, and relationships between families. Contemporary Chinese dowry culture emerges as a dynamic social phenomenon shaped by the interaction of traditional customs, changing economic conditions, and evolving social values. Although it retains the symbolic significance associated with historical marriage rituals and family relationships, its contemporary expressions are influenced by demographic patterns, financial pressures, and social competition. The study suggests that continued social development, policy guidance, and changing attitudes among younger generations may encourage more moderate and simplified dowry practices. Nevertheless, dowry is likely to retain an enduring place in Chinese marriage culture.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
License Terms
All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Under this license, users are permitted to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Under the following conditions:
- Attribution (BY)
Users must give appropriate credit to the author(s) and the journal, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes were made. Attribution must not suggest endorsement by the author(s) or the journal.
- NonCommercial (NC)
The material may not be used for commercial purposes. Any use primarily intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or monetary compensation is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder.
- NoDerivatives (ND)
If users remix, transform, translate, adapt, or build upon the material, they may not distribute the modified material. The work must be shared in its original and unaltered form.
This license ensures that published works remain freely accessible to the academic community and the public, while protecting the integrity of the original research and the rights of the author(s).
For the full legal code of this license, please visit:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
References
Anderson, S. (2007). The economics of dowry and brideprice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(4), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.4.151
Chen, J., & Pan, W. (2023). Bride price and gender role in rural China. Heliyon, 9(1), Article e12789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12789
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://www.routledge.com/Sex-Differences-in-Social-Behavior-A-Social-role-interpretation/Eagly/p/book/9780898598049
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. Harcourt, Brace & World. https://casbs.stanford.edu/social-behavior-its-elementary-forms
Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. George Routledge & Sons. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/55822
Turner, V. W. (1967). The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual. Cornell University Press. https://archive.org/details/forestofsymbolsa00turn_1
Wan, Y. (2024). Between money and intimacy: Brideprice, marriage, and women’s position in contemporary China. Demographic Research, 50, 1353–1386. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2024.50.46
Watson, R. S., & Ebrey, P. B. (Eds.). (1991). Marriage and inequality in Chinese society. University of California Press. https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/public/book/marriage-and-inequality-in-chinese-society.html
Wei, S.-J., & Zhang, X. (2011). The competitive saving motive: Evidence from rising sex ratios and savings rates in China. Journal of Political Economy, 119(3), 511–564. https://doi.org/10.1086/660887
Yan, Y. (2005). The individual and transformation of bridewealth in rural north China. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 11(4), 637–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2005.00255.x