Dowry Culture in Chinese Society: Symbolic and Gender Implications

Main Article Content

Shun Pan
Pim Samara Yarapirom

Abstract

          This study examines the persistence and transformation of dowry culture in contemporary Chinese society, focusing on how dowry practices reflect and reinforce gender roles and power relations, and how they function as a culturally embedded system of social exchange between families. Drawing on Bronislaw Malinowski’s analysis of the Kula Ring and Victor Turner’s theory of symbolism, the study conceptualizes dowry as a ritualized exchange situated within gender relations and kinship structures. A qualitative research design integrates a literature review, case analysis, and semi-structured interviews. Ten key informants were selected through purposive sampling, including married couples, parents, and young adults preparing for marriage. The findings indicate that dowry continues to serve as a symbolic expression of marital commitment and familial obligation, while sustaining social relationships and affirming family prestige. Its significance extends beyond material value to encompass the negotiation of social expectations, gendered responsibilities, and relationships between families. Contemporary Chinese dowry culture emerges as a dynamic social phenomenon shaped by the interaction of traditional customs, changing economic conditions, and evolving social values. Although it retains the symbolic significance associated with historical marriage rituals and family relationships, its contemporary expressions are influenced by demographic patterns, financial pressures, and social competition. The study suggests that continued social development, policy guidance, and changing attitudes among younger generations may encourage more moderate and simplified dowry practices. Nevertheless, dowry is likely to retain an enduring place in Chinese marriage culture.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pan, S., & Pim Samara Yarapirom. (2026). Dowry Culture in Chinese Society: Symbolic and Gender Implications. International Journal of Development Administration Research, 9(3), 11–22. retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ijdar/article/view/288625
Section
Research Article

References

Anderson, S. (2007). The economics of dowry and brideprice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(4), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.4.151

Chen, J., & Pan, W. (2023). Bride price and gender role in rural China. Heliyon, 9(1), Article e12789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12789

Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://www.routledge.com/Sex-Differences-in-Social-Behavior-A-Social-role-interpretation/Eagly/p/book/9780898598049

Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355

Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. Harcourt, Brace & World. https://casbs.stanford.edu/social-behavior-its-elementary-forms

Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. George Routledge & Sons. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/55822

Turner, V. W. (1967). The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual. Cornell University Press. https://archive.org/details/forestofsymbolsa00turn_1

Wan, Y. (2024). Between money and intimacy: Brideprice, marriage, and women’s position in contemporary China. Demographic Research, 50, 1353–1386. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2024.50.46

Watson, R. S., & Ebrey, P. B. (Eds.). (1991). Marriage and inequality in Chinese society. University of California Press. https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/public/book/marriage-and-inequality-in-chinese-society.html

Wei, S.-J., & Zhang, X. (2011). The competitive saving motive: Evidence from rising sex ratios and savings rates in China. Journal of Political Economy, 119(3), 511–564. https://doi.org/10.1086/660887

Yan, Y. (2005). The individual and transformation of bridewealth in rural north China. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 11(4), 637–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2005.00255.x