Political Literacy in Thailand’s Pre-Primary and Primary Education Curricula in the Digital Age
Main Article Content
Abstract
Political literacy has gained paramount importance in the digital era, as young learners require not only civic virtues but also the capacity to critically engage with mediated information. This study analyzes the integration of political literacy within Thailand's pre-primary and primary education curricula, incorporating insights from educators and academic experts to guide curriculum enhancement. The study employed a qualitative design, integrating document analysis of the Early Childhood Education Curriculum B.E. 2560 (2017) and the Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551 (2008), interviews with 24 educators in Northern Thailand, and a focus group of six academic experts. The analysis was informed by four elements of political literacy: political knowledge, political skills, political attitudes, and competencies relevant to the digital age. Research indicates that political literacy predominantly manifests in implicit forms via moral development, social responsibility, and democratic coexistence, whereas explicit political knowledge, critical political skills, and competencies pertinent to the digital age are notably deficient, particularly in areas such as source evaluation, misinformation detection, digital verification, and awareness of AI- and algorithm-driven information contexts. The study emphasizes the necessity for a clearer and developmentally suitable curriculum design and adds to the sparse scholarship on political literacy in preprimary and primary education, especially in Northern Thailand.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
License Terms
All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Under this license, users are permitted to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Under the following conditions:
- Attribution (BY)
Users must give appropriate credit to the author(s) and the journal, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes were made. Attribution must not suggest endorsement by the author(s) or the journal.
- NonCommercial (NC)
The material may not be used for commercial purposes. Any use primarily intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or monetary compensation is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder.
- NoDerivatives (ND)
If users remix, transform, translate, adapt, or build upon the material, they may not distribute the modified material. The work must be shared in its original and unaltered form.
This license ensures that published works remain freely accessible to the academic community and the public, while protecting the integrity of the original research and the rights of the author(s).
For the full legal code of this license, please visit:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
References
Alexander, R. C. (2009). Political literacy is information literacy. Communications in Information Literacy, 3(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2009.3.1.64
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bucher, T. (2018). If... then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
Bureau of Academic Affairs and Educational Standards. (2017). Early Childhood Education Curriculum B.E. 2560 (2017). Agricultural Co-operative Federation of Thailand.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Crick, B., & Porter, A. (1978). Political education and political literacy: The report of the advisory group on education for citizenship. Longman.
Gran, A.-B., Booth, P., & Bucher, T. (2021). To be or not to be algorithm aware: A question of a new digital divide? Information, Communication & Society, 24(12), 1779–1796. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1736124
Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Livingstone, S., & Third, A. (2017). Children and young people’s rights in the digital age: An emerging agenda. New Media & Society, 19(5), 657–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686318
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
McDougall, J., Zezulkova, M., van Driel, B., & Sternadel, D. (2018). Teaching media literacy in Europe: Evidence of effective school practices in primary and secondary education (NESET II report). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/613204
Mihailidis, P. (2018). Civic media literacies: Re-imagining engagement for civic intentionality. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1428623
Ministry of Education. (2008). Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008). Office of the Basic Education Commission. https://neqmap.bangkok.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Basic-Education-Core-Curriculum.pdf
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2017). Early Childhood Curriculum B.E. 2560 (A.D. 2017). Ministry of Education. https://academic.obec.go.th/web/images/document/1572317446_d_1.pdf
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.
Perveen, M., & Awan, A. S. (2017). Analysis of the curriculum about political literacy as a dimension of citizenship education. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(1), 187–202. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1210116
Şan, E., Akpınar, M., Tarman, B., & Aslan, M. (2023). The role of political literacy in promoting coexistence in the context of political polarization and radicalization. Education Sciences, 13(8), Article 763. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080763
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage.
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535
UNESCO. (2024). AI competency frameworks for students. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-competency-framework-students
Wineburg, S., McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., & Ortega, T. (2016). Evaluating information: The cornerstone of civic online reasoning. Stanford History Education Group. https://purl.stanford.edu/fv751yt5934