A Structural Equation Model of Leadership, Technology Acceptance Model, Organizational Policies, and ESG Score Improvement Affecting the Performance of Listed Companies in Thailand Stock Exchange

Article Sidebar

pdf
Published: Jun 30, 2024
Keywords:
A Structural Equation Model of Leadership TAM Organizational Policies Organizational Efficiency

Main Article Content

Thanaphon Cheungsirakulvit
Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University
Supattra Pranee
Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University
Bundit Pungnirund
Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University
Nattapong Techarattanased
Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University

Abstract

          The purpose of this research is to study the factors that contribute to the development of a structural equation model affecting ESG and impacting the efficiency of companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. The structural equation modeling process will be utilized as a tool for analysis and hypothesis testing. The population for this study comprises managerial personnel or those involved in the management and monitoring of organizational operations, representing each company in the stock market. Data will be collected using questionnaires, with a total sample size of 400 individuals.
          The research found that A Structural Equation Model congruent with the observational data, as evidenced by the following fit indices: CMIN/df = 3.189, GFI = 0.92, NFI = 0.934, RFI = 0.914, IFI = 0.954, TLI = 0.939, CFI = 0.954, RMSEA = 0.074. The hypothesis testing results indicate that the leadership variable, technology acceptance variable, and organizational policy variable have a statistically significant positive direct influence on the development and enhancement of ESG scores and the organizational performance of companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand at a significance level of 0.01.

Article Details

How to Cite
Cheungsirakulvit, T., Pranee, S., Pungnirund, B. ., & Techarattanased, N. . (2024). A Structural Equation Model of Leadership, Technology Acceptance Model, Organizational Policies, and ESG Score Improvement Affecting the Performance of Listed Companies in Thailand Stock Exchange. International Journal of Development Administration Research, 7(1), 45–58. retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ijdar/article/view/271373
Issue
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): January - June 2024
Section
Research Article

 

License Terms

All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

Under this license, users are permitted to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.

Under the following conditions:

  1. Attribution (BY)

Users must give appropriate credit to the author(s) and the journal, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes were made. Attribution must not suggest endorsement by the author(s) or the journal.

  1. NonCommercial (NC)

The material may not be used for commercial purposes. Any use primarily intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or monetary compensation is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder.

  1. NoDerivatives (ND)

If users remix, transform, translate, adapt, or build upon the material, they may not distribute the modified material. The work must be shared in its original and unaltered form.

This license ensures that published works remain freely accessible to the academic community and the public, while protecting the integrity of the original research and the rights of the author(s).

For the full legal code of this license, please visit:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

 

References

Chen, C., & Wang, D. (2020). The Role of Technology in Promoting Social Responsibility and Transparency. Business Ethics Quarterly, 30(4), 517-543.

Huang, D. Z. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) activity and firm performance: a review and consolidation. Accounting & Finance, 61(1), 335-360.

Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks L. T. (2021). Firms and Social Responsibility: A Review of ESG and CSR Research in Corporate. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66(3), 1-14.

Grewal, R., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Market Reaction to Mandatory Nonfinancial Disclosure. Management Science, 64(1), 208-233.

Jin, Zhu., Fei-Hsin, Huang. (2023). Transformational Leadership, Organizational Innovation, and ESG Performance: Evidence from SMEs in China. Sustainability, 15(7), 1-23. doi: 10.3390/su15075756

Jones, T., & Felps, W. (2020). The Impact of Organizational Policies on ESG Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(3), 807-824.

Liu, Y., & Chen, C. (2020). The Influence of Environmental Policies on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 112, 1-10.

Mannix, E., & Neilsen, C. (2020). Adapting to change with flexible technology. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(5), 885-900.

Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2019). Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1), 118-140.

Muhammed, K. et al. (2022). Organizational effectiveness: Educational leadership and its impact on organizational effectiveness. Journal of Humanities and Education Development, 4(6), 53-66. doi: 10.22161/jhed.4.6.5

Qingju, Z. (2023). Ethical Leadership as a Prerequisite for Sustainable Development, Sustainable Finance, and ESG Reporting. Sustainable finance and finance crime, 107-126. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-28752-7_6

SiJian Niu, Byung Il Park & Jin Sup Jung. (2022). The Effects of Digital Leadership and ESG Management on Organizational Innovation and Sustainability. Sustainability, 14(23), 15639.

Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2020). The Impact of Technology Adoption on Environmental Sustainability. Journal of Environmental Management, 265, 109876.

Waldman, D. A., & Galvin, B. M. (2018). Alternative perspectives of responsible leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 47(2), 97-105.