Human rights as a moral language and the politics of life of blind singers
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research examines the human rights ideology as part of a global political-moral project, translated locally by the Thailand Association of the Blind, and social activities in Thailand. Data was collected through the use of participant observation and by carrying out informal interviews with blind singers. In addition, key informants from government organizations and non-profit organizations were also interviewed about the development of the conceptual basis, strategic and operational function of those organizations for blind people. Additional data such as online information, books, or supplementary field data were used for analysis. The paper reveals that human rights as it is applied to the human dignity doctrine among people living with disabilities have become the new moral-political language and singular moral category among blind singers. People with disabilities are unable to adapt to the value standards that the moral language of human rights produces. They will be socially excluded and considered without human dignity. The article also pointed out that human rights are not universal. It can create a value standard by which to judge the inequality of human beings in a population. It can be understood by studying human rights in the context in which they manifest themselves in the world of social life to whom human rights are entangled.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยอุบลราชธานี
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยอุบลราชธานี และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆในมหาวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว
References
Tingsmith, V. (2023, December 30). Human rights according to the 2017 Constitution. https://www.constitutionalcourt.or.th/occ_web/ ewt_dl_link.php?nid=9613
Baudrillard, J. (2012). The Spirit of Terrorism and Other Essays. London and New York: Verso.
Brown, W. (2004). “The Most We Can Hope For…”: Human Rights and the Politics of Fatalism. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 3(2/3), 451-463.
Feldman, I. & Ticktin, M. (2010). Government and Humanity. In Feldman, I. & Ticktin, M. (Eds.), In the Name of Humanity: The Government of Threat and Care. (pp. 1-26). Durham and Landon: Duck University Press.
Goodale, M. (2007). Location rights, envisioning law between the global and the local. In Goodale, M. & Merry S. E. (Eds.), The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law between the Global and the Local. (pp. 1-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodale, M. (2012). Human Rights. In Fassin, D. (Ed.), A Companion to Moral Anthropology. (pp.468-481). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Leve, L. (2007). “Secularism is a Human Rights!”: Double-Binds of Buddhism, Democracy, and Identity in Nepal. In Goodale, M. & Merry, S. E. (Eds.), The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law between the Global and the Local. (pp. 78-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moyn, S. (2010). The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
Oliver, M. (1990). The Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Persons with Disabilities Empowerment Act. (2007). Royal Thai Government Gazette, 124 (61A), pp. 8–24.
Redfield, P. (2005). “Doctors, Borders, and Life in Crisis.” Cultural Anthropology, 20(3), 328-361.
Riewpaiboon, W. (1999). The Literature Review for Service System Development and Rehabilitation in Order to Improve the Quality of Life of Disabled People. Nonthaburi: Health System Research Institute. (in Thai)
The Institute of Health Promotion for People with Disability. (2007). The Politics of Persons with Disabilities Newsletter, 4, 40-50.
(in Thai)
The Institute of Health Promotion for People with Disability. (2008). The Politics of Persons with Disabilities Newsletter, 13, 34-35. (in Thai)
The Institute of Health Promotion for People with Disability. (2009). The Politics of Persons with Disabilities Newsletter, 14, 7-11.
(in Thai)
The Institute of Health Promotion for People with Disability. (2010). The Politics of Persons with Disabilities Newsletter, 18, 13-15. (in Thai)
Theerabutrara, S. (1983). Problem of Disabled People in City and Social Welfare Council. In Department of Social Welfare. (Ed.), Document on International Year of Disabled Persons 1981. Bangkok: Pimluk Press. (in Thai)
Thepsittha, S. (1993). The concept and direction of the Council of Social Welfare in helping people with disabilities. In Praksornkit, N. and Thepsittha, S. (Eds.), Social problem book series on the problem of people with disabilities and concepts and directions of the Council on Social Welfare in helping people with disabilities. (pp. 26-35). Bangkok: Council of Social Welfare of Thailand. (in Thai)
Ticktin, M. (2012). Introduction: Human Rights and Global Corporations. Social Research, 79(4), 1017-1021.
Zigon, J. (2013). Human Rights as Moral Progress? A Critique. Cultural Anthropology, 28(4), 716-736.
Zizek, S. (2005). Against Human Rights. New Left Review, 34, 115-131.