A Review of Chinese Critical Discourse Analysis Research in 2024
Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis, Review, 2024, Chinese ResearchAbstract
Since its introduction to the academic community in China in 1995, Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) has undergone initial developmental stages and has been widely accepted over the past 30 years. An increasing number of Chinese scholars have begun to apply the principles and methods of CDA to explore the role of discourse in Chinese social life. Against this backdrop, this study selects 32 core articles from the CSSCI and Peking University Core journals in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database for the year 2024, focusing on chinese CDA research. The research findings are divided into two parts: theoretical research and practical research. Theoretical research explores the relationship between language and reality, as well as studies on CDA based on cognitive linguistics and psychological frameworks. The practical research examines CDA applications in politics and media, economy and energy, culture and literature, education and related fields, and socio-cultural aspects. This study concludes that the research themes of CDA in 2024 exhibit diversity and interdisciplinarity. The research methods mainly include the social cognitive approach, multimodal discourse analysis, corpus linguistics, metaphor analysis, three-dimensional discourse analysis, proximization theory, and others. Future research recommendations include exploring how to uncover the deep-seated structures and ideologies of discourse through large-scale corpus analysis, while also placing greater emphasis on cross-cultural discourse analysis within the context of globalization. This involves investigating how discursive practices interact and influence each other across diverse cultural, linguistic, and social contexts.
References
参考文献
曹茹、张萌.五四时期报刊“科学主义”话语的建构与竞争.[J].中国新闻传播研究,2024,(02):163-176.
陈静.美国对华科技政策中的智库角色——基于话语制度主义的分析框架.[J].情报杂志,2024,43(11):61-67.
陈鹏、童欣安.高质量发展时期我国产教融合政策的话语生成逻辑.[J].职业技术教育,2024,45(30):37-44.
代树兰、苗珊.多模态批评话语分析:特征、方法与策略.[J].西安外国语大学学报,2024,32(03):33-37.
冯伟、皮野.论梅兰芳美、苏公演宣传材料中理论话语建构之变异.[J].文化遗产,2024,(01):90-97.
黄劲怡、彭宣维.正式性和权势关系在系统功能模型中的理论归位.[J].中国外语,2024,21(02):23-33.
刘立华.批评实在论基础上的话语建构研究.[J].外语研究,2024,41(01):46-50.
刘鹏.趋近化理论视域下的危机话语研究——基于智利社会危机的案例.[J].北京第二外国语学院学报,2024,46(04):147-161.
刘苹、董格格.中美外交部门新闻发布会的中国形象建构比较研究——基于语料库的批评话语分析.[J].新闻与传播评论,2024,77(02):106-118.
陆祖林、靳彤.1949年以来语文教材话语流变及特征——基于批评话语的分析.[J].语文建设,2024,(19):61-65+72.
孟艳丽.新媒体婴幼儿英语教育话语中的合法化策略.[J].语言学研究,2024,(01):221-234.
潘承君.语料库辅助的教材话语分析路径——以大学英语教材为例.[J].当代外语研究,2024,(04):83-94+117.
孙成志、晋鑫哲.日本“一带一路”新闻话语的批评隐喻分析.[J].北京第二外国语学院学报,2024,46(04):133-146.
孙冬阳、陈春华.北极环境话语中的多模态跨距策略.[J].外语学刊,2024,(05):26-33.
唐丽萍、朱田田、杨丽芳.美国大报中的中国经济崛起形象研究——基于语料库的及物性视角“中国对X做什么”.[J].外语教学理论与实践,2024,(06):20-33.
王宏俐、闫开伦、张寅.基于语料库与机器学习的推特涉华生态话语研究.[J].外语电化教学,2024,(03):48-55+115.
王晓莉、胡开宝.基于语料库的“小康社会”英译在美英印主流媒体的传播与接受研究.[J].外语电化教学,2024,(03):13-20+110.
王宇康.德国首部《国家安全战略》中的话语空间评析——基于批评认知语言学视角.[J].情报杂志,2024,43(07):97-103+145.
谢群、王晓涵.批评性体裁分析视角下网购商家反馈语的话语类型模式分析.[J].外语学刊,2024,(03):48-55.
辛斌、王永亮.批评话语分析的认知心理学基础.[J].北京第二外国语学院学报,2024,46(04):16-28.
闫潼.基于语料库的新加坡外交话语中的中国形象研究.[J].北京第二外国语学院学报,2024,46(05):27-44.
禹建湘、张浩翔.网络文学研究的多元视角分析与展望——2023年中国网络文学批评综述.[J].当代作家评论,2024,(03):45-51.
张丹、田路晗、刘立华.基于语料库的中国扶贫国外报道话语研究.[J].山东外语教学,2024,45(02):22-34.
张辉.语言如何构建(社会)现实——批评认知语言学的视角.[J].外语教学,2024,45(05):23-31.
张洁、张露茜.中国书法在“一带一路”东盟国家的传播研究——基于媒体语料库的主题与态度考察.[J].湖南社会科学,2024,(05):166-172.
张翼、徐一楠.人与技术的异化关系:智能手表广告的批评隐喻分析.[J].英语研究,2024,(01):117-126.
赵珞琳、毛婉怡.作为“容器”的网红——基于语料库的“网红”概念史研究.[J].出版科学,2024,32(04):86-98.
赵秀凤、吴雨昕.能源危机政治漫画中蓄意隐喻的批评分析——以“健康与疾病”多模态隐喻场景为例.[J].外语研究,2024,41(02):1-6+112.
周陈新、刘东虹.中美经贸摩擦新闻的修辞博弈话语分析.[J].当代外语研究,2024,(01):113-124.
Fairclough, N. Language and power. [M]. London: Longman, 1989.
Fowler, R., Hodge, R., Kress, G. & Trew, T. Language and control. [M]. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul,1979.
Liu, K., & Guo, F. A review on critical discourse analysis. [J]. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2016, 6(5), 1076.
van Dijk, T. A. Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schaffner & A. Wenden (Eds.), Language and peace. [M]. Aldershot: Dartmouth, 17-33, 1995.
van Dijk, T. A. Opinions and ideologies in the press. In A. Bell and P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse. [M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 21-63, 1998.
Wodak, R. Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. In J. Verschuren, J. O. Ostman & J. Blommaert (Eds.) Handbook of pragmatics-manual. [M]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 204-210, 1995.
Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. Methods of critical discourse analysis. [M]. London: SAGE Publications, 2001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Chinese Language and Culture Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารภาษาและวัฒนธรรมจีน มหาวิทยาลัยหัวเฉียวเฉลิมพระเกียรติ
บทความใน “วารสารวิชาการภาษาและวัฒนธรรมจีน” เป็นทรรศนะของผู้เขียนโดยเฉพาะ กองบรรณาธิการไม่มีส่วนในความคิดเห็นในข้อเขียนเหล่านั้น
