DEVELOPING CREATIVE THINKING SKILLS OF ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION ENGINEERING STUDENTS THROUGH SCENARIO-BASED LEARNING USING GENERATIVE AI
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this research study were to 1) compare the learning achievement of students before and after the course, 2) evaluate the creative thinking skills of students, and 3) study the satisfaction of students learning through a simulated situation using Generative AI. The sample group consisted of 8 students from the Robotics and Automation Engineering program at Si Songkhram Industrial Technology College, Nakhon Phanom University, who were enrolled in the "Creative Thinking and Problem Solving" course. The research instruments included 1) Lesson plan and 2) A 30-item achievement test covering four lessons. It was validated for content by three experts with a reliability of 0.81 and a difficulty index (p) ranging from 0.25 to 0.78, which is within an appropriate range. 3) A 20-item creative thinking skills assessment, comprising four main aspects: Originality, Flexibility, Fluency, and Elaboration. The assessment was validated for content by three experts with an Index of Item Objective Congruence (IOC) ranging from 0.67 to 1.00 and a reliability of 0.89. and 4) A 10-item student satisfaction questionnaire. It was validated for content by three experts with an Index of Item Objective Congruence (IOC) ranging from 0.80 to 1.00 and a reliability of 0.90. The statistical methods used for data analysis were percentage, mean, standard deviation, and t-test.
The research findings were as follows: 1) the post-test learning achievement in creative thinking skills had an average score of 26.50 out of 30 points, equivalent to 88.33%. This was significantly higher than the 60% criterion at a statistical significance level of 0.05, 2) for creative thinking skills, the students achieved an average score of 21.75 for Originality (87.00%), 22.17 for Fluency (88.68%), 20.83 for Flexibility (83.32%), and 19.42 for Elaboration (77.68%), all of which were at a "very good" level, and 3) the overall student satisfaction had an average score of 4.58 with a standard deviation of 0.51.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความทุกเรื่องได้รับการตรวจความถูกต้องทางวิชาการโดยผู้ทรงคุณวุฒิ ทรรศนะและข้อคิดเห็นในบทความ Journal of Global of Perspectives in Humanities and Social Sciences (J-GPHSS) มิใช่เป็นทรรศนะและความคิดของผู้จัดทำจึงมิใช่ความรับผิดชอบของบัณฑิตวิทยาลัย มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏวไลยอลงกรณ์ ในพระบรมราชูปถัมภ์ กองบรรณาธิการไม่สงวนสิทธิ์การคัดลอก แต่ให้อ้างอิงแหล่งที่มา
References
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist. 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Edirisingha, P. (2024). Working with Generative AI to support interactive learning and teaching: reflections from the European Distance and E-Learning Conference in 2024. Interactive Learning Environments. 32(9), 4763–4765. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2414152
Habib, S., Thomas, V., Anli, X. & Evelyn, T. (2024). How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity. Journal of Creativity. 34, 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100072
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P. & Suman, R. (2022). Artificial Intelligence Applications for Industry 4.0: A Literature-Based Study? Journal of Industrial Integration and Management. 7(1), 83-111. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862221300040
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Makhambetova, A., Nadezhda, Z. & Ergesheva, E. (2021). Personalized Learning Strategy as a Tool to Improve Academic Performance and Motivation of Students. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies. 16(6), 1-17.
Pengrachrong, J., Parichart, T. & Imnam, P. (2022). Lesson Learned: The Process of Teaching and learning by Using Scenarios with High-Fidelity Human imulation in Teaching Maternal and Newborn Nursing and Midwifery II. Journal Health Sciences Scholarship. 9(1), 270-287.
Poomkornsan, N. (2021). Losing Creativity Thinking Skill of Students in the 21st Century Education. Education Journal Faculty of Education, Nakhon Sawan Rajabhat University. 5(1), 1-9.
Promsut, T., Fuangchan, S., Chirinung, P. & Yamnil, S. (2022). A Model of Human resource development in the Thailand 4.0 of the Provincial Industrial Office. Journal of Administrative and Management Innovation. 10(3), 1–22.
The Kommon. (2023, July 25). How generative AI is transforming education. The Kommon. https://www.thekommon.co/generative-ai-education/
ThaiPublica. (2023). World Economic Forum reveals survey on job trends and skills for the next 5 years. https://thaipublica.org/2023/05/world-economic-forum-future-of-job-report/
Wongchai, S. (2021). Development of Writing Quality by Giving Feedback: A Case Study of National Essay Test. Journal of Graduate School. 18(80), 1-18.