The Application of ultrasonic bone knife combined with turbodrill cross incision in extraction of mandibular impacted third molar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
The extraction of mandibular impacted third molars is a common yet complex surgical procedure in oral and maxillofacial surgery due to the close association with mandibular nerves and deep impaction. Traditional bone-chisel extraction methods, though effective, are associated with high trauma and extended recovery periods, leading to increased patient discomfort. This study aims to: (1) Explore individualized approaches for impacted tooth extraction to provide safer and faster options for the removal of mandibular impacted third molars; (2) Provide an alternative sectional extraction approach for impacted teeth in clinical oral surgery; (3) Offer new ideas and a theoretical basis for the extraction of mandibular impacted third molars in clinical practice. This study adopts a case-control research design, including 120 patients with mesioangular impacted mandibular third molars, divided into three groups: traditional bone-chisel extraction (control group) and two experimental groups using an ultrasonic bone scalpel combined with a turbine drill, with either linear or cross-shaped incision. The outcomes were analyzed for surgery time, postoperative pain, swelling, mouth-opening limitation, and complication rates.
The results showed significant differences in surgical time, postoperative pain, and swelling among the groups. The ultrasonic bone scalpel with a cross-shaped incision provided the best outcomes, with shorter surgical times, reduced pain, and minimized swelling compared to the traditional method. The combined use of an ultrasonic bone scalpel and a turbine drill significantly reduced surgical trauma, enhanced recovery, and minimized postoperative complications. The cross-shaped incision method demonstrated particular efficacy, suggesting its potential as the preferred choice for similar extractions.
Article Details
References
Bouloux, G. F., & Steed, M. B. (2007). Impacted third molars: Evidence-based consensus guidelines for prevention and management. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 45 (6), 470-479.
Beck-Mannagetta, J., Klien, C., & Steed, M. (2021). Piezosurgery combined with conventional turbine in third molar removal: Advantages in soft and hard tissue healing. Journal of Oral Surgery, 45 (2), 78-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2021.01.002
Chiriac, G., Dumitrescu, C., & Dragomir, L. (2020). Comparative study on postoperative effects of piezosurgery versus conventional rotary instruments in third molar extraction. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 49 (4), 441-448. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.01.004
Chen, Q., et al. (2019). The traditional methods of tooth extraction and their outcomes. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 48(5), 639-646.
Del Fabbro, M., Taschieri, S., & Weinstein, R. (2019). Effectiveness of ultrasonic bone surgery versus conventional rotary instruments in third molar surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research, 98 (2), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1177 /0022034518820637
Duran, A., & Kwan, H. (2015). Use of ultrasonic devices in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 73 (8), 1588-1594.
Huang, J., et al. (2019). Quality of life after wisdom teeth removal: A systematic review. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 57 (7), 620-628.
Ion, D. I., Popescu, D., & Dumitru, R. (2020). Combined piezosurgery and rotary instruments in lower third molar extraction: Comparative analysis. Journal of Clinical Oral Investigations, 24 (6), 1765-1771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03057-4
Kim, S., et al. (2021). A comparison of conventional and ultrasonic bone cutting techniques. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 32 (6), 2027-2032.
Li, W., et al. (2023). Clinical efficacy of ultrasonic bone scalpel combined with turbine drills in the removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Journal of Oral Medicine, 45 (2), 126-130. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-5619.2023.02.029
Liu, J., et al. (2023). Combined methods for tooth extraction: Current trends. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, 134, 15-22.
Liu, Y., & Zhang, W. (2020). Complications of impacted mandibular third molar extraction: A retrospective study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, 130 (2), 135-142.
O'Connor, K., & Thangavel, K. (2018). Minimally invasive techniques in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, 125 (5), 453-461.
Siddiqi, A., Grundy, M., & Duncan, A. (2021). Comparative outcomes of piezoelectric surgery versus conventional techniques in third molar surgery: A randomised clinical trial. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 59 (1), 34-40. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.008
Smith, J. (2021). Impact of surgical complexity on outcomes of wisdom tooth extractions. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 79 (3), 567-574.
Tan, X., et al. (2021). Understanding the dynamics of tooth sectioning during extraction. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 79 (10), 2065-2072.
Wang, X., et al. (2020). Nerve injury in third molar extraction: A review. Clinical Oral Investigations, 24 (10), 3511-3520.
Wu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021). The effectiveness of ultrasonic bone cutting in extraction of impacted third molars: A systematic review. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 50 (6), 749-758.
Xu, F., et al. (2019). The efficiency of turbine drills in dental procedures. Journal of Dental Research, 98 (8), 839-846.
Zhang, L., et al. (2021). Minimally invasive techniques in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A review. Oral Diseases, 27 (5), 1123-1131.