The Application of ultrasonic bone knife combined with turbodrill cross incision in extraction of mandibular impacted third molar

Main Article Content

Ling Chen
Thanawat Imsomboon
Siriluck Jittrabiab
Jianpeng You

บทคัดย่อ

          The extraction of mandibular impacted third molars is a common yet complex surgical procedure in oral and maxillofacial surgery due to the close association with mandibular nerves and deep impaction. Traditional bone-chisel extraction methods, though effective, are associated with high trauma and extended recovery periods, leading to increased patient discomfort. This study aims to: (1) Explore individualized approaches for impacted tooth extraction to provide safer and faster options for the removal of mandibular impacted third molars; (2) Provide an alternative sectional extraction approach for impacted teeth in clinical oral surgery; (3) Offer new ideas and a theoretical basis for the extraction of mandibular impacted third molars in clinical practice. This study adopts a case-control research design, including 120 patients with mesioangular impacted mandibular third molars, divided into three groups: traditional bone-chisel extraction (control group) and two experimental groups using an ultrasonic bone scalpel combined with a turbine drill, with either linear or cross-shaped incision. The outcomes were analyzed for surgery time, postoperative pain, swelling, mouth-opening limitation, and complication rates.
          The results showed significant differences in surgical time, postoperative pain, and swelling among the groups. The ultrasonic bone scalpel with a cross-shaped incision provided the best outcomes, with shorter surgical times, reduced pain, and minimized swelling compared to the traditional method. The combined use of an ultrasonic bone scalpel and a turbine drill significantly reduced surgical trauma, enhanced recovery, and minimized postoperative complications. The cross-shaped incision method demonstrated particular efficacy, suggesting its potential as the preferred choice for similar extractions.

Article Details

บท
บทความวิจัย

References

Bouloux, G. F., & Steed, M. B. (2007). Impacted third molars: Evidence-based consensus guidelines for prevention and management. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 45 (6), 470-479.

Beck-Mannagetta, J., Klien, C., & Steed, M. (2021). Piezosurgery combined with conventional turbine in third molar removal: Advantages in soft and hard tissue healing. Journal of Oral Surgery, 45 (2), 78-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2021.01.002

Chiriac, G., Dumitrescu, C., & Dragomir, L. (2020). Comparative study on postoperative effects of piezosurgery versus conventional rotary instruments in third molar extraction. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 49 (4), 441-448. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.01.004

Chen, Q., et al. (2019). The traditional methods of tooth extraction and their outcomes. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 48(5), 639-646.

Del Fabbro, M., Taschieri, S., & Weinstein, R. (2019). Effectiveness of ultrasonic bone surgery versus conventional rotary instruments in third molar surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research, 98 (2), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1177 /0022034518820637

Duran, A., & Kwan, H. (2015). Use of ultrasonic devices in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 73 (8), 1588-1594.

Huang, J., et al. (2019). Quality of life after wisdom teeth removal: A systematic review. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 57 (7), 620-628.

Ion, D. I., Popescu, D., & Dumitru, R. (2020). Combined piezosurgery and rotary instruments in lower third molar extraction: Comparative analysis. Journal of Clinical Oral Investigations, 24 (6), 1765-1771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03057-4

Kim, S., et al. (2021). A comparison of conventional and ultrasonic bone cutting techniques. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 32 (6), 2027-2032.

Li, W., et al. (2023). Clinical efficacy of ultrasonic bone scalpel combined with turbine drills in the removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Journal of Oral Medicine, 45 (2), 126-130. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-5619.2023.02.029

Liu, J., et al. (2023). Combined methods for tooth extraction: Current trends. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, 134, 15-22.

Liu, Y., & Zhang, W. (2020). Complications of impacted mandibular third molar extraction: A retrospective study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, 130 (2), 135-142.

O'Connor, K., & Thangavel, K. (2018). Minimally invasive techniques in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, 125 (5), 453-461.

Siddiqi, A., Grundy, M., & Duncan, A. (2021). Comparative outcomes of piezoelectric surgery versus conventional techniques in third molar surgery: A randomised clinical trial. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 59 (1), 34-40. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.008

Smith, J. (2021). Impact of surgical complexity on outcomes of wisdom tooth extractions. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 79 (3), 567-574.

Tan, X., et al. (2021). Understanding the dynamics of tooth sectioning during extraction. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 79 (10), 2065-2072.

Wang, X., et al. (2020). Nerve injury in third molar extraction: A review. Clinical Oral Investigations, 24 (10), 3511-3520.

Wu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021). The effectiveness of ultrasonic bone cutting in extraction of impacted third molars: A systematic review. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 50 (6), 749-758.

Xu, F., et al. (2019). The efficiency of turbine drills in dental procedures. Journal of Dental Research, 98 (8), 839-846.

Zhang, L., et al. (2021). Minimally invasive techniques in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A review. Oral Diseases, 27 (5), 1123-1131.