The Development of Instruction Model on Emphasizing the Connectivism Learning Theory by Using Digital Technology to Enhance Science Communication Competency for Upper Secondary School Students

Main Article Content

Supak Fakngern
Skonchai Chanunun
Wipharat chuachuad Chaiyasith

Abstract

        Problems of science communication competency and changes in society in the digital age.This research aims to 1) study the problems of science learning management according to the connectivist theory emphasizing the use of digital technology, 2) create and verify the quality of the instruction model based on the connectivist theory emphasizing the use of digital technology, and 3) study the effects of using the instruction model based on the connectivist theory emphasizing the use of digital technology to enhance the science communication competency. The sample group consisted of 59 grade 10 students. The research tools included 1)The instruction model based on connectivist theory emphasizing the use of digital technology, 2) a science communication competency assessment form. Data were analyzed using statistical mean, standard deviation, t-test, and content analysis.
          The research findings were as follows: 1) The problems included students lacking skills in searching for information and synthesizing and summarizing knowledge from data. 2) The instruction model consisted of 5 components:1. principles, theories,  2. objectives, 3. content, 4. learning process, and 5. evaluation and assessment. The researcher synthesized a 4-step teaching and learning process called the CCRA Model, consisting of 1. Communicating scientific issues using digital technology, 2. Connecting understanding through communication using digital technology,  3. Reflecting on scientific communication through digital technology, and 4. Assessing scientific communication through digital technology. Overall, the assessment of the instruction model was found to be most appropriate (x̅= 4.55, S.D. = 0.54) and 3) The results of using the learning management model based on connectivist theory emphasizing the use of digital technology to enhance science communication competency showed that post-learning scores were significantly higher than pre-learning scores at the .05 statistical level.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fakngern, S., Chanunun , S. ., & chuachuad Chaiyasith, W. . (2024). The Development of Instruction Model on Emphasizing the Connectivism Learning Theory by Using Digital Technology to Enhance Science Communication Competency for Upper Secondary School Students. Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi, 9(4), 578–593. retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JRKSA/article/view/268959
Section
Research Article

References

เฉลิมชัย บุญยะลีพรรณ. (2561). ไขข้อสงสัย โอเน็ตเด็กไทย ยิ่งสอบ-ยิ่งต่ำ. ออนไลน์. สืบค้นเมื่อ 3 มีนาคม 2564. แหล่งที่มา: https://www.matichon.co.th/education/news_897320

นำชัย ชีววิวรรธน์. (2557). SuperSci : สื่อวิทย์ สื่อยังไง ทำไมคนไม่สนใจ ?. ออนไลน์. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 เมษายน 2564 แหล่งที่มา: https://mgronline.com/science/detail/9570000141928/.

วิจารณ์ พานิช. (2556). การสร้างการเรียนรู้สู่ศตวรรษที่ 21. กรุงเทพมหานคร: มูลนิธิสยามกัมมาจล.

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2560). แผนพัฒนาเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติแห่งชาติ ฉบับที่ 12 พ.ศ.2560 – 2564. กรุงเทพมหานคร.

อัลเบิร์ต ไอน์สไตน์. (2497). มุมมองและความคิดไอน์สไตน์. [Ideas and Opinions] (Stanley Bennett,แปล). กรุงเทพมหานคร: แอร์โรว์ มัลติมีเดีย, บจก.

Farkas, M. (2012). Participatory technologies, pedagogy 2.0 and information literacy. Library Hi Tech. 30 (1), 82-94.

Hassan. (2016). Studying the effectiveness of application performance management (ATM) tools for detecting performance.13, 209-225.

Joyce and Weil. (2000). Models of teaching. ( 6th ed.). New Jersy: Prentice Hall.

Kulgemeyer, C., & Schecker, H. (2015). Students explaining science-assessment of science communication competence. Research in Science Education. 43 (6), 2235-2256.

Schwartzman, R., Kirchoff, B.K., Cuny, K.M. (2019). Roles of Communication Centers in Communicating Science: A Multi-Disciplinary Forum.Communication Center Journal. 5, 81-101.

Siemens,G. (2005). Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. Online. Retrieved September 12, 2022, from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm.

Toffler, A. (1992). Powershift: Knowledge, Wealth, and Power at the Edge of the 21st Century. London Bridge Books.

Trna and Trnova. (2013). Implementation of connectivism in science teacher training. Journal of educational and instructional studies in the world. vol 3. 191-196.

Utecht & Keller. (2019). Becoming relevant again: applying connectivism learning theory to today’s classrooms. Critical Questions in Education.107-119.

Verhagen, P. (2006). Connectivism: A new learning theory. Surf e-learning themasite. 11.