The Teacher’s Competency Development Model of Fine Arts in Universities Under Liaoning Province

Main Article Content

Zhao Yue
Somsak Chanphong
Sutida Howattanakul

บทคัดย่อ

          The objectives of this research were: (1) To study the components and variables of teacher’s competency model development of fine arts in universities under Liaoning province. (2) To propose the guideline for improving teacher’s competency development of fine arts in universities under Liaoning province.
          The research was a mixed methodology research.  Population was fine arts teachers in universities under Liaoning Province, totaling 640 people, sample size 242. The sample size was determined by Krejcie and Morgan's Table (1970 : 607-610) was obtained by stratified random sampling method, sample size was 242. The instruments used for data collection were semi-structured interview form, five-point rating scale questionnaires and focus group discussion form. The response rate of questionnaires was 100%. Statistics used for data analysis included frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, exploratory factor analysis, and content analysis.
          The research findings were revealed that (1) teacher’s competency development model of fine arts in universities under Liaoning province consisted of 7 components as follow, ego trait contains 15 variables, motivation contains 18 variables, self-concept contained 12 variables, emotional Competencies contains 18 variables, basic competency contains 15 variables, teaching competence contains 21 variables, and professional competence contains 15 variables; and (2) the guideline for improving teacher’s competency development model of fine arts in universities under Liaoning province. There were 27 guiding principles for improving teacher’s competency development model of fine arts in universities under Liaoning province.

Article Details

บท
บทความวิจัย

References

David, M. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American psychologist. 28 (1), 1-14.

James, W. (1884). On some omissions of introspective psychology. Mind. 9 (33), 1-26.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research. activities. Educational and psychological measurement. 30 (3), 607-610.

Liu, Y., & Li, X. (2010, 3). Construction of the evaluation index system of competence of teachers in Chinese colleges and universities. Journal of Educational Science, Hunan Normal University, 89-94.

Medley, D. M., & Crook, P. R. (1980). Research in teacher competency and teaching tasks. Theory into practice. 19 (4), 294-301.

Spencerl.M, & Spencers.M. (2003). Talent Evaluation Method: Building Superior Performance models [M]. Wei Meijin, trans. Shantou: Shantou University Press.

Ye, H., Zhao, S., & Miao, Y. (2010, 4 15). Cultivate Teachers' Competence and Promote Teachers' Professional Development. Jiangxi Education, p. 5. online. Retrieved 06 2023, from Cultivate teachers' competence and promote teachers' professional development: https://wenku.baidu.com/view/4bbcd80248fe04a1b0717fd5360c

ba1aa9118c8e.html