“A Study the Perspective of Executives, Teachers, Parents and Students Toward Hybrid Learning in Banwangthong Wattana Primary School of Thailand”
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the education industry, leading to inadequate student education and a shift towards technology and online learning. Despite the recovery, the pandemic has accelerated the transformation of teaching-learning paradigms, making it crucial to adopt long-term policies to equip students with 21st-century skills.
The objective of the research was to examine the viewpoints of various stakeholders at Banwangthong Wattana Primary School, located in Pathum Thani Province, Thailand. These viewpoints would form an integral component of examining the implementation of Hybrid learning, with potential applicability to other schools in Thailand that share a similar environment. The study employed a case study design, utilizing a qualitative methodology that involved conducting semi-structured interviews with six individuals who were selected to represent different functions within the school. These individuals included the Academic Assistant Principal, who represented the administration function, two students who served as learners, two teachers who acted as instructors, and one parent who played the role of a supporter. The participants selected for this study were an Academic Assistant Principal and several teachers, chosen through purposive sampling. The sample population consisted of parents and students who were selected using convenience sampling. The data derived from the interviews underwent thematic analysis.
The results of the study indicated that both educators and parents expressed significant worry over student engagement and concentration during online instruction. All relevant parties collaborate to facilitate the advancement of online teaching and the advancement of Pedagogical and Technological Proficiencies through self-development.
Article Details
References
Al-Senaidi, S., Lin, L., & Poirot, J. (2009). Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning in Oman. Computers & education, 53(3), 575-590.
Barba-Sánchez, V., Martínez-Ruiz, M. D. P., & Jiménez-Zarco, A. I. (2007). Drivers, benefits and challenges of ICT adoption by small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs): a literature review. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 5(1), 103-114.
Bernard, H. R. (2017). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rowman & Littlefield.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1997). Qualitative research for education. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley & Sons.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Bryan, & Volchenkova. (2016). Blended Learning: Definition, Models, Implications for Higher Education. Bulletin of the South Ural State University Series “Education. Education Sciences,”8(2), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.14529/ped160204
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Gallagher, M. S. (2018). KakaoTalk meets the ministry of education: mobile learning in South Korean higher education. In Mobile learning and higher education (pp. 136-147). Routledge.
Glesne, C. (2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. Pearson. One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458.
Gonzalez, T., de la Rubia, M. A., Hincz, K. P., Comas-Lopez, M., Subirats, L., Fort, S. & Sacha, G. M. (2020). Influence of COVID-19 confinement on students’ performance in higher education. PLoS ONE, 15(10), article e0239490. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0239490
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1), 59-82.
Jung, I. (2005). ICT-pedagogy integration in teacher training: Application cases worldwide. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8(2), 94-101.
Ilomaki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence–an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and information technologies, 21(3), 655-679.
Kirschner, P., Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2008). Benchmarks for teacher education programs in the pedagogical use of ICT. In International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education(pp. 435-447). Springer, Boston, MA.
Krysik, J. L. (2013). Research for effective social work practice. Routledge.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. sage.
Lindner, J. R. (1998). Understanding employee motivation. Journal of extension, 36(3), 1-8.
Luthans, K. (2000). Recognition: A powerful, but often overlooked, leadership tool to improve employee performance. Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(1), 31-39.
Markauskaite, L. (2007). Exploring the structure of trainee teachers’ ICT literacy: the main components of, and relationships between, general cognitive and technical capabilities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(6), 547-572.
Meleisea, E. L. L. I. E. (2007). The UNESCO ICT in education programme. Bangkok, Thailand: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Michos, K., & Hernández-Leo, D. (2020). CIDA: A collective inquiry framework to study and support teachers as designers in technological environments. Computers & Education, 143, 103679.
Nabi-Ranjbari, M., Heidari Tabrizi, H., & Afghari, A. (2020). Evaluation of the Latest Pre-Service Teacher Education Curriculum in EFL Context: A Testimony of Teachers, Teachers Educators and Student Teachers' Perspectives. Applied Research on English Language, 9(1), 1-24.
Nashir, M., & Laili, R. N. (2021). Hybrid Learning as an Effective Learning Solution on Intensive English Program in the New Normal Era. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 9(2), 220232.
Nganji, J. T. (2018). Towards learner-constructed e-learning environments for effective personal learning experiences. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(7), 647-657.
Pozos Pérez, K. V., & Tejada Fernández, J. (2018). Competencias digitales en docentes de educación superior: niveles de dominio y necesidades formativas. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 12(2), 59-87.
Reichstein, C. (2019). Strategic IT management: how companies can benefit from an increasing IT influence. Journal of enterprise information management.
Spall, S. (1998). Peer debriefing in qualitative research: Emerging operational models. Qualitative inquiry, 4(2), 280-292.
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative inquiry, 16(10), 837-851.
Tuffaha, M. (2020). The determinants of employee’s performance: A literature review. Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 3(3), p14-p14.
Walters, M. (1995). Performance management Handbook/Institute of personnel and development. London.–1995. Рисунок А.
Whitley, R. (2002). Competing capitalisms: Institutions and economies. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Zhang, J. (2022). Research on Mixed Classroom Application Effect under Information Technology-Take Jining Normal University as an Example. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology, 6(8), 62-67.