Effects of Flipped Task-Based Learning on Grammatical Achievement and Learners’ Perceptions among Pre-service EFL Teachers
Keywords:
flipped learning, task-based learning, grammatical achievementAbstract
This study aims 1) to compare the English grammatical achievement of students taught through flipped task-based learning and that of students taught through communicative language teaching, and 2) to examine learners’ perceptions of flipped task-based learning. The research employed a quasi-experimental design. The samples were 60 first-year undergraduates majoring in English Education at a public university, divided into an experimental group and a control group. The researcher assessed the students’ technological readiness and then divided them into the experimental group and the control group. There were 30 students in each group. The research instruments were 1) learning management plans, 2) grammatical achievement tests, and 3) a questionnaire on students’ perceptions. The findings of the study are as follows: 1) the learners in the experimental group who were taught through flipped task-based learning demonstrated significantly higher grammatical achievement than those in the control group, with a statistically significant difference in mean improvement scores at the .001 level and an effect size of 1.22 and 2) the learners reported a high level of overall agreement (M = 4.12, SD = 0.81), particularly in terms of engagement (M = 4.23, SD = 0.71). The model provided the students with opportunities to exchange ideas and participate in collaborative activities. However, some students expressed concerns regarding the pre-class workload, technological readiness, and the applicability of the flipped learning model to other courses. These findings suggest that flipped task-based learning can enhance students’ grammatical achievement and foster positive attitudes toward learning English. Additionally, it can develop students’ self-directed learning skills and encourage classroom participation.
References
ภาษาไทย
บุญชม ศรีสะอาด. (2560). การวิจัยเบื้องต้น (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 10). สุวีริยาสาส์น.
สุพัฒน์ สุกมลสันต์. (2553). ขนาดของผล: ความมีนัยสำคัญทางปฏิบัติในการวิจัย. วารสารภาษาปริทัศน์, 25, 26-38. www.culi.chula.ac.th/Images/asset/pasaa_paritat_journal/file-25-148-dvkis2254169.pdf
สุมิตรา อังวัฒนกุล. (2539). วิธีสอนภาษาอังกฤษ (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 3). สำนักพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2567). รายงานประจำปี 2567. https://backoffice.onec.go.th/uploads/Book/2122-file.pdf
อนุวัติ คูณแก้ว. (2566). การทดสอบ การวัดผลและการประเมินผลการศึกษาแนวใหม่. สำนักพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
อีเอฟ เอ็ดดูเคชั่น เฟิร์สท์ (EF Education First). (2025). EF EPI ดัชนีความสามารถทางภาษาอังกฤษของ EF: การจัดลำดับทักษะภาษาอังกฤษของ 123 ประเทศและภูมิภาค. https://www.ef.co.th/assetscdn/WIBIwq6RdJvcD9bc8RMd/cefcom-epi-site/reports/2025/ef-epi-2025-thai.pdf
ภาษาอังกฤษ
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2023). Flipped classroom in higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00430-5
Bintz, G., Barenberg, J., & Dutke, S. (2024). Components of the flipped classroom in higher education: Disentangling flipping and enrichment. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1412683. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1412683
Chen, O., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2023a). A cognitive load theory approach to defining and measuring task complexity through element interactivity. Educational Psychology Review, 35, Article 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09782-w
Chen, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Xie, H., & Su, F. (2023b). Effects of flipped language classrooms on learning outcomes in higher education: A Bayesian meta-analysis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(2), 65-97. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8019
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2014). Grammar teaching for language learning. Babylonia, 2(14), 10–15. https://babylonia.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/2014-2/Ellis.pdf
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.
Han, H., Røkenes, F. M., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2024). Student teachers’ perceptions of flipped classroom in EFL teacher education. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11839-w
Hoa, C. T. H., & Tung, N. D. (2023). A framework for task-based flipped classroom in EFL education in Vietnam. Innovare Journal of Education, 11(2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2023v11i2.47047
Jartitngarm, N. (2025). Exploring self-regulated learning and motivational strategies in a flipped classroom: Implications for academic achievement. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 18(2), 456–492. https://doi.org/10.70730/BZWO9910
Kampookaew, P. (2020). An analysis of grammatical errors made by Thai EFL university students in an EAP writing class: Issues and recommendations. rEFLections, 27(2), 246–273. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v27i2.248862
Kantamas, K. (2023). Assessment of a flipped classroom: An innovative method of teaching English for EFL undergraduate students in Thailand. World Journal of English Language, 13(7), 467-472. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n7p467
Kaosayapandhu, M. (2023). Application for grammar skills: A case study of Thai EFL undergraduates. PASAA, 67(1), 309-329. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.67.1.10
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
Kusuma, I. P. I. (2022). How does a TPACK-related program support EFL pre-service teachers’ flipped classrooms?. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 300–325. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/259931
Lee, Y. J., Jeong, S. H., & Li, Y. (2022). Korean pre-service teachers’ flipped learning experiences in a teacher education program. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4), 711–717. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.4.711
Lertcharoenwanich, P., & Soontornwipast, K. (2024). The effects of flipped learning integrated with roleplay on EFL business English undergraduates’ oral communication performance. PASAA, 68(1), 408–439. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.68.1.12
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell.
Murillo-Zamorano, L. R., López Sánchez, J. Á., & Godoy-Caballero, A. L. (2019). How the flipped classroom affects knowledge, skills, and engagement in higher education: Effects on students’ satisfaction. Computers & Education, 141, Article 103608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103608
Namli, S., Guler, C., & Guler, G. (2026). Reimagining geometry instruction: Pre-service teachers’ TPACK development through a flipped learning teaching experiment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 176, Article 105520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2026.105520
Ng, L. K., & Lo, C. K. (2022). Flipped classroom and gamification approach: Its impact on performance and academic commitment on sustainable learning in education. Sustainability, 14(9), Article 5428. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095428
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667336
O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
Pawabutra, P., & Sutakote, C. (2024). An analysis of grammatical errors in English speaking of Thai EFL learners. Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 5(3), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.62819/jel.2024.625
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Pilu, R., Jabu, B., & Sulaiman, I. (2025). Flipped learning and its challenges: Understanding students' struggles in Indonesian EFL contexts from teachers' viewpoint. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1575385. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1575385
Pitikornpuangpetch, C., & Suwanarak, K. (2021). Teachers’ beliefs and teaching practices about communicative language teaching (CLT) in a Thai EFL context. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(2), 1–27. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/253254
Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press
Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge University Press. https://www.professorjackrichards.com/wp-content/uploads/Richards-Communicative-Language.pdf
Suraprajit, P. (2021). An analysis of errors in English essays written by Thai non-English major students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1101.02
Sweller, J. (2024). Cognitive load theory and individual differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 110, Article 102423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102423
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Wang, S., & Liu, C. (2018). Task-based flipped classroom in Chinese college EFL teaching: An empirical study in oral English course. International Journal of Contemporary Education, 1(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijce.v1i1.3086
Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford University Press.
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Longman.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
