An Analysis of Sentences Error in Business Email Writing of Thai EFL Students

Authors

  • Chayakorn Sutakote Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University
  • Khomsin Sarntong Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University
  • Pongsatorn Pawabutra Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University

Keywords:

EFL students, business email writing, error analysis, sentence structure, grammatical errors

Abstract

This research aimed to 1) examine and classify types of sentence errors in business email writing produced by students, and 2) analyze the frequency, ranking, and percentage distribution of sentence errors identified in business email writing of students. The study analyzed 192 business emails with content focusing on inquiries, requests for action, information exchange, and scheduling/confirming appointments. The research instruments employed were 1) a collection form for email writing samples from students and 2) an assessment form for error classification. Data analysis used an adapted framework from Corder (1974) and Gass et al. (2013), implementing a systematic four-stage process including preserving original data, identifying errors by two researchers, categorizing errors using a framework synthesized from Dulay et al. (1982) and Langan (2012), and conducting quantitative analysis to determine frequency and percentage distribution. The findings revealed that: 1) four principal categories of sentence errors: independent clause structure, dependent clause structure, interrogative structure, and imperative structure, along with supplementary categories including run-on sentences and sentence fragments; 2) quantitative analysis revealed that omission errors were most prevalent (48.64%), followed by miscellaneous structural errors (23.78%), addition errors (22.70%), and word order errors (4.86%). These findings demonstrate the specific grammatical challenges encountered by Thai learners in professional communication contexts and contribute to understanding Thai EFL learners' interlanguage development in professional communication contexts. The study offers empirical evidence for enhancing business English curricula through targeted error remediation strategies.

References

Albelihi, H. H. M., & Al-Ahdal, A. (2024). Overcoming error fossilization in academic writing: Strategies for Saudi EFL learners to move beyond the plateau. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(75), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00303-y

Boonraksa, U., & Naisena, A. (2022). A study on English collocation errors of Thai EFL students. International Journal of Learning and Development, 15(1), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n1p164

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). Pearson.

Choironi, N. (2017). An analysis of students' grammatical error in writing descriptive text based on surface strategy taxonomy at second grade of SMAN 1 Pesisir Tengah Krui [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Lampung.

Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learner’s errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(4), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161

Corder, S. P. (1974). Error analysis. Oxford University Press.

Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. D. (1982). Language two. Oxford University Press.

Ehsanzadeh, S. J., & Dehnad, A. (2024). Analysis of high-frequency errors and linguistic patterns in EFL medical students' English writing: Insights from a learner corpus. BMC Medical Education, 24(1264), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06242-z

Gass, S., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L. (2013). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Routledge.

James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Longman.

Kampookaew, P. (2020). An analysis of grammatical errors made by Thai EFL university students in an EAP writing class: Issues and recommendations. Reflections, 27(2), 246-273. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v27i2.248862

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 33(2), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529786

Langan, J. (2012). College writing skills with readings (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students' academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(9), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9

Mubarok, Y., & Budiono, T. (2022). An error analysis on EFL students' writing. Englisia Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 9(2), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i2.11386

Murtiana, R. (2019). An analysis of interlingual and intralingual errors in EFL learners’ composition. Jurnal Educative Journal of Educational Studies, 4(2), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.30983/educative.v4i2.2544

Pham, H. N. U., & Nguyen, T. D. (2024). Translanguaging in EFL classrooms: Practice and implications for lecturers from students' lens. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 4(4), 54-68. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.24443

Prapobratanakul, C. (2024). Thai EFL undergraduate engineering students' perspectives on academic writing: Challenges and strategies. PASAA, 68(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.68.1.1

Pratami, R. M. A. (2019). First language (L1) interference in errors found in Thai EFL Learners` paragraph writing [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Sanata Dharma University.

Rusmiati, R. (2019). Surface strategy taxonomy on foreign language writing: A study on verb tense usage. Jurnal Serambi Ilmu, 20(2), 189-201. https://ojs.serambimekkah.ac.id/serambi-ilmu/article/view/1453

Seddik, M. A. (2023). Error analysis in EFL students' writing skill: Pedagogical implications for Egyptian contexts. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(4), 163-172. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376656961_Error_Analysis_in_EFL_Students'_Writing_Skill

Thi, N. K., Vo, D. V., & Nikolov, M. (2023). Investigating syntactic complexity and language-related error patterns in EFL students’ writing: Corpus-based and epistemic network analyses. Language Learning in Higher Education, 13(1), 127-151. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2023-2009

Touchie, H. Y. (1986). Second language learning errors: Their types, causes, and treatment. JALT Journal, 8(1), 75–80. https://jalt-publications.org/sites/default/files/pdf-article/art5_8.pdf

Waelateh, B., Boonsuk, Y., Ambele, E. A., & Jeharsae, F. (2019). An analysis of the written errors of Thai EFL students’ essay writing in English. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research in Asia, 25(3), 55-82. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/psujssh/article/view/242002

Watcharapunyawong, S., & Usaha, S. (2013). Thai EFL students' writing errors in different text types: The interference of the first language. English language teaching, 6(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p67

Yang, H., Gao, C., & Shen, H. (2024). Learner interaction with, and response to, AI-programmed automated writing evaluation feedback in EFL writing: An exploratory study. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4), 3837–3858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11991-3

Downloads

Published

2025-09-29

How to Cite

Sutakote, C., Sarntong, K., & Pawabutra, P. (2025). An Analysis of Sentences Error in Business Email Writing of Thai EFL Students. Journal of Education Studies, Chulalongkorn University, 53(03), 1–16. retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/EDUCU/article/view/278479