Development of an Instructional Process Based on Active Learning and Systemic Thinking to Enhance Innovative Creation Ability of Undergraduate Students

Authors

  • krissada worapin -

Keywords:

innovative creation ability, active learning, systemic thinking

Abstract

This research aimed to 1) develop active learning instruction and systematic thinking process; 2) compare innovation creativity of undergraduate students before and after experiment; 3) study progress in innovation creativity of undergraduate students in control group. The study was divided into two phrases: a phase for the development of the instructional process and a phase to evaluate the developed instructional process. The sample group consisted of 30 undergraduate Mathematics students in the third year of semester 1 of academic year 2023 bachelor's degree program selected by purposive sampling. The tool used for data collection was an assessment form on creative innovation. The results showed that: 1) The developed instructional process was composed
of 5 steps; presenting the learning scenario, designing self-learning, joining groups for learning exchange, creating works from learning, and evaluating and applying the learning; 2) participating undergraduate students had higher creative innovation ability after the experiment at the .05 level of significance; 3) participating undergraduate students they improved their creative innovative ability better every week.

References

ภาษาไทย

ทิศนา แขมมณี. (2555). ศาสตร์การสอน : องค์ความรู้เพื่อการจัดกระบวนการเรียนรู้ที่มีประสิทธิภาพ:

สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย. กรุงเทพฯ.

วิชัย วงศ์ใหญ่ และ มารุต พัฒผล. (2562). การพัฒนาทักษะสร้างสรรค์นวัตกรรม. บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย

มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ.

สำนักงานวิชาการและมาตรฐานการศึกษา กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ. (2560). แนวการจัดการเรียนรู้ตามหลักสูตรแกนกลางการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน พุทธศักราช 2551: โรงพิมพ์ ชุมนุมสหกรณ์การเกษตรแห่งประเทศไทย. กรุงเทพฯ.

ภาษาอังกฤษ

ASEAN University Network. (2020). Guide to AUN-QA Assessment at Programme Level Version 4.0. Asean University Network Quality Assurance. Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.

Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2004). Handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local design. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer publishing.

Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2009). Active Learning: An Introduction. http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/bublic/Papers/ALpaper (ASQ).pdf

Kambiz, E. M. (2004). Links Between Systems Thinking and Complex Dicision Making.

System Dynamics Review, 20(1), 21-48.

Melaville, A., & Blank, M. J. (2015). Community-based learning: Engaging students for

success and citizenship. http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/ slcepartnerships/40

Robert, N. (2012). Self-Improvement Guide: How to Adopt Creative Thinking. USA: Lulu press.

Senge, P. M. (2006). The Fifth Discipline Field Book: The Art & Practice of Learning

Organization. London: Random House Business.

Sheffield Hallam University. (2000). Active Teaching and Learning Approaches in Science: Workshop ORIC Bangkok. Photocopied.

Sherman, S. J., & Sherman, B. S. (2004). Science and Science teaching. Westport: Greenwood Press.

Tyler, R. W. (1969). Educational Evaluation: New Roles, New Means. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Yan L. (2007). Design Creativity in Product Innovation. International Journal adjustment Manufacturing Technology, 33(1), 213-22

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

worapin, krissada. (2023). Development of an Instructional Process Based on Active Learning and Systemic Thinking to Enhance Innovative Creation Ability of Undergraduate Students. Journal of Education Studies, 51(4), EDUCU51040013 (14 pages). Retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/EDUCU/article/view/265233