Argumentation Practice in Engineering Design Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/educu.2023.29Keywords:
argumentation practice, engineering design process, epistemic practice, STEMAbstract
Argumentation practice is consisted in science and engineering practices (SEPs) that play
a crucial role in shifting science education from “knowing science” to “doing science” while also challenging the learner to solve real-world problems. However, teaching argumentation practice in science classrooms has become a challenge for teachers in regard to distinguishing argumentation from constructing scientific explanations, understanding the nature of argumentation, and embedding argumentation in STEM to a more authentic context. This article aims to draw the teaching of argumentation practice with the engineering design process through investigating the ecology of engineering features synthesized from the nature of engineering, nature of engineering knowledge, engineering literacy, and engineering practice. These engineering elements resonate with the three functions of argumentation; verification, persuasion, and justification, all of which exist as a commonality between argumentation and the engineering design process. Through this, teachers would be supported in facilitating and designing argumentation experience in the engineering design process to enhance learner’s epistemic agency, which would allow them to connect these practices to solving problems in their daily lives.
References
Antink-Meyer, A., & Brown, R. A. (2019). Nature of engineering knowledge. Science & Education, 1–21.
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26-55.
Capobianco, B. M., Diefes-dux, H. A., Mena, I., & Weller, J. (2011). What is an engineer? Implications of elementary school student conceptions for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 304–328.
Chen, Y.-C., & Terada, T. (2021). Development and validation of an observation-based protocol to measure the eight scientific practices of the next generation science standards in K-12 science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(10), 1–38.
Chen, Y.-C., Lin, J.-L., & Chen, Y.-T. (2014). Teaching scientific core ideas through immersing students in argument: Using density as an example, Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 51(3), 78-88.
Cunningham, C., M., & Kelly, G. J. (2017). Epistemic practices of engineering for education. Science Education, 101(3), 486-505.
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933.
Konstantinidou, A., & Macagno, F. (2012). Understanding students’ reasoning: Argumentation schemes as an interpretation method in science education. Science & Education. 22, 1069–1087.
Kelly, G. J. (2016). Methodological considerations for the study of epistemic cognition in practice. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Braten (Eds.) Handbook of epistemic cognition. 393–408.
Kelly, G. J., & Licona, P. (2018). Epistemic practices and science education. History, philosophy and science teaching: New perspectives, Switzerland: Springer. 139-165
Lin, S. & Mintzes, J. J. (2010). Learning argumentation skills through instruction in socioscientific issues: The effect of ability level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 993-1017.
Mason, L., & Santi, M. (1994, April 4-8). Argumentation structure and metacognition in constructing shared knowledge at school. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Annual Meeting, New Orleans.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For States, By States. The National Academies Press.
Osborne, J. F. & Patterson, A. (2010). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? Science Education, 95(4), 627–638.
Pleasants, J., & Olson, J. K. (2018). What is engineering? Elaborating the nature of engineering for K‐12 education. Science Education. 103(1), 145-166.
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92(3), 447-472.
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 235-260.
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. London: Cambridge University Press.
Zollman, A. (2012). Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 12–19.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
