Professional Competence of Teachers in Teaching Practice in Educational Institutions of Students in the Physical Education Program Faculty of Education Phranakhon Si Ayutthaya Rajabhat University Academic Year 2025
Keywords:
Professional Competence Teachers, Teaching Practice in Educational Institutions, Education StudentsAbstract
This research consists purposes were to study the results of the assessment of teacher professional competency in teaching practice in schools for Physical Education Program, Faculty of Education, Phranakhon Si Ayutthaya Rajabhat University, academic year 2025. This study employed a quantitative research design. The research instrument was a teacher professional competence assessment form with a content validity index of 0.95. The target group consisted of 25 physical education students, selected through purposive sampling. Data collected from the assessment forms were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including percentages, means, standard deviations and relative gain scores. The research findings revealed that 1) Learning Management: In the first assessment, the behavioral indicators were at a good level (µ = 3.71, σ = 0.14) and in the second assessment, they were also at a good level (µ = 4.33, σ = 0.20). Overall, the behavioral indicators were at a good level (µ = 4.02), with a relative gain score of 48.33% and an effect size of 3.08, which was at a high level. 2) Relationships with Parents and Community: In the first assessment, the behavioral indicators were at a passing level (µ = 3.38, σ = 0.24) and in the second assessment, the behavioral indicators were at a good level (µ = 4.01, σ = 0.29). Overall, the behavioral indicators were at a good level (µ = 3.69), with a relative gain score of 38.68% and an effect size of 1.98, which was at a high level and 3) Performing Teacher Duties Regarding Professional Ethics: the first assessment, the behavioral indicators were at a good level (µ = 3.97, σ = 0.16), and in the second assessment, they were at a very good level (µ = 4.55, σ = 0.14). Overall, the behavioral indicators were at a good level (µ = 4.26), with a relative gain score of 56.78% and an effect size of 3.11, which was at a high level.