DYNAMICS AND THE PROMOTION OF ELDERLY CARE IN THAILAND AND LAO PDR

Main Article Content

Warinee Sopajorn
Akchatree Suksen
Artit Phanphoon
Sisoury Phommaseng
Sommay Silivanh

Abstract

This study aimed (1) to analyze and compare the cultural dynamics influencing patterns and methods of elderly care in Thailand and the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR), and (2) to develop culturally grounded recommendations for promoting elderly care that are appropriate for contemporary society. A qualitative phenomenological approach with a cross-cultural comparative design was employed. The research was conducted in Nong Khai Province, Thailand, and Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR. Key informants were purposively selected and included 20 older persons and family caregivers, along with 10 stakeholders such as community leaders, monks, village health volunteers, and social welfare practitioners. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions using semi-structured guides, with audio recordings and field notes. Content and thematic analyses were applied.


Findings indicate that filial piety remains the central cultural value shaping elderly care in both countries, with families acting as the primary caregivers and communities providing supplementary support through social networks. However, notable differences emerged. In Thailand, rapid socio-economic change and technological advancement have led to more diverse caregiving practices, including indirect care and increased reliance on digital communication. In contrast, Lao PDR continues to emphasize close, co-residential family care rooted in traditional practices.


Based on these findings, the study recommends integrating traditional cultural values with modern care systems, promoting collaboration among families, communities, and formal institutions, and encouraging flexible, context-sensitive care models. Such culturally informed approaches are essential for ensuring sustainable and effective elderly care in the evolving Thai–Lao context.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000).From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51(6), 843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage.

Castle, N. G., & Ferguson, J. C. (2010). What is long-term care? The Gerontologist, 50(2), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq003

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.

United Nations. (2023). World Social Report 2023: Leaving No One Behind in an Ageing World. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

United Nations. (2022). World Population Prospects 2022. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). (2020). Population and development in Lao PDR. UNFPA Lao PDR.

World Bank. (2016). Live long and prosper: Aging in East Asia and Pacific. World Bank.

Knodel, J., & Teerawichitchainan, B. (2017). Aging in Southeast Asia: An overview. The Gerontologist, 57(4), 616-625. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/ gnw 116

Knodel, J., Bussarawan, T., & Friedman, J. (2020). The impact of migration on elderly parents in Southeast Asia: A comparative study. Population and Development Review, 46(3), 471-501.

Teerawichitchainan, B., Phetsiriseng, I., & Knodel, J. (2019). The Situation of Older Persons in Lao PDR: Results from the 2017 Survey of Neighboring Countries. HelpAge International.

Zimmer, Z., & Das, S. (2019). The evolution of the family and support of the elderly in high-income and low-income countries. In Aging in Asia (pp. 31-52). Springer, Cham.