Analysis the role of monks within Act of ministry

Abstract

            There are three objective of this research journal. The first is for learning about wield power of public authorities, second foe study and compare the duty of monks in Cambodia. Last one is the analysis about problem, fact and Laws about the duty of monks within Act of ministry 1962 along with set the execution following to the purpose of Laws and discipline.

The temple is legal person in public law. There is Sangha Supreme Councilbe the most important organization foradministrationand Supreme Patriarch is leader of kingdom, has duty following to Act of ministry 1962and amendment(2) 1992, assign the rule, constitution, regulation and governance guidelines of ministry to be consistent with Thai governance. So, it is very important for image of Buddhism The peace of monks and governance of monks since past to nowadays, there is be relate with the government, need to make well support for furtheranceof monks and not conflict with discipline.So, the Buddhist ecclesiastical official monk who has duty following to Act of ministry 1962and amendment(2) 1992, and be officer in law. Who need to govern fairly within public law.And to be well manage organizationfor stability and the most useful of monks and Buddhist. Moreover need to developand changeall time by step. All this be good for well understand and be useful for management of monks. Finally, this support for the most useful of Buddhismand social.

Nowadays, the Laws is very important and necessary for livelihood. The laws and rules of social that prescribe to be edict, all for peace in social. So if someone allude to they do not know about Laws and sinless, cannot accept in Laws. Since criminal code, article 64 “The person cannot alibi by ignorantialigis non excusat. Unless the court decide according to the conditions and circumstances of person, the court can let the offender show evidence and courtagree with them evidence so the court can decide the offender get punishment less than in the Laws.” Howeverthe person in authority need to use the principle of law for support impartiality Creatively. The Laws just be tool fordecide wrong and correct and the person in authority need tokeep spirit of laws.