Study on the adaptation of Funaya houses under the Denken system in the preservation area of Ine town, Japan

Authors

  • Patcharaporn Duangputtan Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Saga University, Japan
  • Nobuo Mishima Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Saga University

Keywords:

Funaya, Japanese vernacular architecture, Denken system, Ine town, Japan

Abstract

   

In Japan, there is an effective system in managing for of Traditional Buildings or the “Denken system” in numerous preservation areas. This paper aims to study and understand the preservation system in Ine town and clarify the architectural adaptation of Funaya houses, which are cultural heritages in the conservation area, following an increasing number of tourists. The methods of the study include a field study, a survey in the preservation area and mainly interview the officer in charge of the preservation board in Ine town about the adaptation of Funaya houses in the preservation area, and analyze some adapted houses from the front elevations. The findings are clarified in two main points, involving the management of the Denken system for the preservation and the adaptation of Funaya houses for tourism under the Denken system in Ine town. As a result, this study can be applied as a case study of management of cultural heritages or vernacular or traditional houses for other villages and districts which have similar context as well.

References

Alvarez, F. J. (2018). The shift of valuation and management in ‘Denken Chiku’ protected townscapes in Japan; comparative analysis with contemporary western protection policies. Tokyo: Waseda University.

Board of Education Ine town. (2005). Ineura dentotekikenzobutsugen hozon taisaku chosa hokokusho. (In Japanese) [Report of study for maesurement on preservation of Preserved district “Ine-ura town”]. Kyoto: n.p.

Issarathumnoon, W. (2004). The Machizukuri bottom-up approach to conservation of historic communities: lesson for Thailand. The Nippon Foundation (API Fellowships) 2003-2004, 1-20.

Koyama, S. (2019, October 15). Interview. Board of Education Ine town (教育文化財保護係伊根町教 育委員会社会).

Kyoto Prefecture. (2020). Kyotofu kanko iriko kyaku chosa hokoku sho. (In Japanese) [Kyoto prefecture tourism visitor survey report]. Retrieved November 7, 2020, from https://www.pref.kyoto.jp/kanko/1282292270316.html

Meiji and Hosei University. (2012). Design sir vei “Kenchiku Bunka” shi sairoku fukkoku. (In Japanese) [Design survey]. Tokyo: Shokokusha.

Nagahama, F. (2019, October 14). Interview. Member of the preservation area in Ine fishing village.

Oranratmanee, R. (2009). Sathapattayakam phuen thin: karn sueksa wijai lae karn patibat wichacheep. (In Thai) [Vernacular architecture: architecture education, research and practice]. Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, 8 (1), 56-66.

Poonpol, D. (2004). Ruen ran kha phuen thin yeepun (Machiya). (In Thai) [Japanese shop house (Machiya)]. Journal of the Faculty of Architecture Silpakorn University. 20, 94-104.

Silapacharanan, S. (2014). The conservation of traditional waterfront markets in Thailand. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 9 (1), 57-68.

Srisakulchairak, T. (2018). Karn sueksa khunkha baan mai phuen thin Chiang Khan peua karn anurak duay krabuankarnmeesuanruam. (In Thai) [A study of value of Chiang Khan wooden house for conservation by participatory process. Journal of Environmental Design, Faculty of Architecture Chiang Mai University, 5 (1), 20-43.

Tachakitkachorn, T. (2009). Denken system in Japan: important district for preservation of a group of traditional building. Nakhara : Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 5 (1), 55-68.

Teng, L. (2012). [Human scale development: the common goal is that Varvsstaden in Vastra Hamnen should be an attractive neighborhood with human scale strategy]. Retrieved July 11, 2020, from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:831811/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Downloads

Published

31-12-2020