People centered approaches to conservation of nature and culture
This article studies a paradigm shift in the cultural and natural heritage from care of heritage to well-being of the heritage and wider society as a whole. The concept tries to protect both natural heritage and cultural heritage with people-centered approaches. The paradigm is also emphasizing the well-being of society from heritage protection and management systems, in responded to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This approach will foster understanding people and communities, who are the key elements for heritage management and to ensure that natural and cultural heritage play an important and dynamic role in the societies today and future. A quantitative synthesis of theory frameworks and case studies in the world heritage process are implemented through 3 issues: 1) Heritage place, its values and its context, 2) Governance of the heritage place, and 3) Management of heritage sites Implementing management of the heritage place. This new paradigm of heritage conservation and management is responded to the complex issues that could potentially be applied to different social and environmental conditions. The connection between natural and cultural heritage has become an important tool in the interpretation, conservation and sustainable management of both natural and cultural resources. Participation must be engaged in the early stage of valuation process, not the end of conservation result by letting people listen to the value of their own heritage. This is one of the major challenges related to the authority and governmental bodies responsible for heritage governance at all levels.
Albert, M.T. (2012). Perspectives of world heritage: towards future-oriented strategies with the five ‘Cs’. In Albert, M. T., et al. (Eds.). Community development through world heritage. (pp.32-38). Paris: UNESCO.
Brown, J. & Hay-Edie, T. (2013). COMPACT: engaging local communities in stewardship of World Heritage. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
Boccardi, G. (2015). From mitigation to adaptation: a new heritage paradigm for the Anthropocene. In Albert, M.T. (Ed.). Perceptions of sustainability in heritage studies. (pp.87–98). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Carmichael, D. L., et al. (1994). Sacred sites, sacred places. New York: Routledge.
Descola, P. (2005). Beyond nature and culture. In Marshall, P. J. (Ed.). Proceedings of the British Academy, Volume 139, 2005 Lectures. (pp.137-155). London: British Academy.
Franco, J. L. A. (2013). The concept of biodiversity and the history of conservation biology: from wilderness preservation to biodiversity conservation. História (São Paulo), 32 (2), 21-48.
International centre for the study of the preservation and restoration of cultural property. (2015). People-centred approaches to the conservation of cultural heritage: living heritage. Rome: Author.
Istudor, N., et al. (2014). Changing management paradigms in nature conservation. In International Conference on Competitiveness of Agro-food and Environmental Economy Proceedings, 2014. (pp. 137-155). Retrieved January 15, 2020, from https://econpapers.repec.org/article/aesicafee/v_3a3_3ay_3a2014_3ap_3a20-25.htm
Jokilehto, J. (1986). A history of architectural conservation: the contribution of English, French, German and Italian thought towards an international approach to the conservation of cultural property. (Doctoral dissertation). England: The University of York.
Jopela, A. (2011). Traditional custodianship: a useful framework for heritage management in Southern Africa. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 13, 103-122.
Jopela, A. (2016). Traditional management systems at heritage sites in Africa. Midrand: African World Heritage Fund.
Katriina, S. & Inger, S. (2014). Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability. Geoforum, 51, 213-223.
Keurs, T. P. (2019). Heritage is never neutral, it’s always interpreted. Retrieved January 5, 2020, from https://www.leiden-delft-erasmus.nl/en/news/heritage-is-never-neutral-its-always-interpreted
Klein, B. (2006). Cultural heritage, the Swedish folklife sphere, and the others. Cultural Analysis, 5, 57-80.
Kretzmann, J. P., & McKnight, J. L. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: a path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. Skokie: ACTA Publications.
Lertpaithoon, S. (2000). Phraratchabanyat kamnot phaen lae khanton karn krachai amnat hai kae ongkon pokkhrong suan thongthin pho so song phan ha roi si sip song. (In Thai) [Decentralization according to determining plans and process of decentralization to local government organization act B.E. 2542. Bangkok: Thammasat University.
Mason, R. (2002). Assessing values in conservation planning: methodological issues and choices. In De La Torre, M. (Ed.). Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage. (Research report). (pp.5−30). Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.
Miura, K. (2005). Conservation of a ‘living heritage site’ a contradiction in terms? a case study of Angkor world heritage site. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 7 (1), 3−18.
Phillips, A. (2002). Management guidelines for IUCN category V protected areas: protected landscapes/seascapes. Cambridge: IUCN.
Poulios, I. (2014). Past in the present: a living heritage approach - Meteora, Greece. London: Ubiquity Press.
Puang-ngam, K. (2000). Karn pokkhrong thongthin Thai. (In Thai) [Thailand local governance]. Bangkok: Winyuchon.
Tansukanun, P. (2019). Phuentee nai chiwit pracham wan khong chumchon lawaek ban nai khet kamphaeng mueang Chiangmai. (In Thai) [Daily life space of a local neighbourhood in the old city of Chiang Mai]. Journal of Environmental Design, 6 (2), 85-109.
Taruvinga, P. (2007). Community participation and rock art management in Zimbabwe. In Deacon, J. (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2004 International Rock Art Conference. (pp. 39-48). Nairobi: TARA.
Taylor, B. (2005). Encyclopedia of religious and nature. London: Thoemmes Continuum.
The international council of monuments and sites. (2011). Guidance on heritage impact assessments for cultural World Heritage properties. Paris: Author.
Thomas, L. & Middleton, J. (2003). Guidelines for management planning of protected areas. Retrieved January 3, 2020, from https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/PAG-010.pdf
UNESCO. (2007). World heritage: challenges for the millennium. Paris: World Heritage Centre.
UNESCO. (2013). Managing cultural world heritage. Paris: World Heritage Centre.
UNESCO. (2015). World heritage no.75: culture - nature links. Retrieved January 8, 2020, from http://whc.unesco.org/en/review/75/
Van Bommel, S. & Turnhout, E. (2012). The (onto) politics of classifying biocultural diversity: a tale of chaos, order and control. In Arts, B., et al. (Eds.). Forest-people interfaces. (pp.223-238). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Van Rensburg, L. & Koltze, L. (2003). Legislative protection of cultural heritage resources: a South African perspective. Queensland University of Technology Law and Justice Journal, 3, 121-140.
Wijesuriya, G., Thompson, J. & Court, S. (2017). People-centred approaches: engaging communities and developing capacities for managing heritage. In Chitty, G. (Ed.). Heritage, conservation and communities: engagement, participation and capacity building. (pp. 34-50). London: Routledge.
Copyright (c) 2020 Faculty of Architecture, Chiang Mai University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.