A Study of Public Relations Knowledge and Skills From Public Relations Curriculum, Academicians'View and Professionals’ View

Main Article Content

Bu-nga Chaisuwan

Abstract

This study is to explore the knowledge and skills provided by the offering courses of the Public Relations (PR) curriculum in undergraduate level to know the expectation of PR academicians and PR professionals towards the knowledge and skills of the PR graduates. Also, it is to investigate the similarities or differences between the knowledge and skills provided by the PR program in undergraduate level, and how they are expected by PR academicians and PR professionals. Six undergraduate PR curriculums offered by six leading universities in Thailand were studied along with the interview with the key informants who are 14 public relations academicians and 19 public relations professionals.


            The research finds the similarities as well as the differences among the public relations curriculum, academicians' expectation and professionals' expectation towards the public relations graduates.


            In terms of PR knowledge, both curriculum perspective and professionals focus on persuasion concepts and strategies while academicians and professionals have the same opinion on the importance of societal trends. The differences are marketing which is provided by curriculum, where as principle of business, and business case study are expected by academicians.


            Curriculum, academicians, and professionals all agree on the mastery of language in written and oral communication as the highest expected skill for graduates. However, while the curriculum puts its effort to train the graduates in terms of media selection and usage and strategic planning, the academicians expect to see the graduates have the computer literacy, and photography literacy, whereas PR professionals give their expectations on issue and crisis management as well as public speaking and presentation


            In addition, the academicians expect the graduates' confidence as the most common personality trait while the professionals expect patience or a strong work ethic and high energy from the graduates.


            The research results can provide the framework for developing public relations curriculum, especially, regarding to Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education: TQF: HEd which is designed to support implementation of Education Act the educational guidelines set out in the National Education Act.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

Bu-nga Chaisuwan

Bu-nga Chaisuwan (Ph.D. (Communication), Chulalongkorn University, 2002). is the full-time lecturer of the Department of Public Relations, Albert Laurence School of Communication Arts, Assumption University

References

Baskin, O.W., Aronoff, C. J., and Lattimore, D.J. (1997). Public Relations: the Profession and the Practice. (4th Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Busch C., Maret, P. S. D., Flynn, T., Kellum, R., Le, S., Meyers, B., Saunders, M., White, R., and Palmquist, M., (2005). Content Analysis. Writing@CSU. Colorado State University Department of English. from http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/research/content/.(accessed on January 8, 2008)
Commission on Public Relations Education (1999). Public Relations Education for the 21st centuryA Port of Entry. New York: Public Relations Society of America.
Commission on Public Relations Education (2006). The Professional Bond-Public Relations Education and the Practice. New York: Public Relations Society of America.
Daradirek, E. (1994). Public Relations Education and Teaching in Thailand. Paper presented at
the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association (80", New O-leans, LA, November 19-22, 1994)
Denzin, N. K. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, 2000.
Dostal, B.N. (1990). The Future of Public Relations: A Multi-Disciplinary Analysis. Competitive paper
for panel on Planning for uncertain world: Processes and data needed for Change, November 1-4, 1990, Illinois.
Dickson (2000). Mass Media Education in Transition: Preparing for the 21" Century. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Fischer, R. (2000) “Rethinking public relations curricula: Evolution of thought 1975-1999". Public Relations Quarterly. Summer 2000. Retrieved from FindArticles.com. 14 Apr. 2008. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa5515/is_200007/ai_n21457439
Gibson, D. C. (1992-1993). ASK/PR: An Outcome Perspective on Public relations Education. Public Relations Quarterly, 37 (4), 45-48.
Grunig, J. E. (1989). Teaching public relations in the future. Public Relations Review, 14 (1), 12-24.
Harrison, S. L. (1990). Ethics and moral issues in public relations curricula. Journalism Educator, 45 (3), 32-38.
Heath, R. L. (1991). Public relations research and education: Agendas for The 990s. Public Relations Review, 17 (2), 185-194.
Hornaman. (2000). Public relations education and the public relations profession. Abstract of Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Mass Communication.
Hulin, B. (2004). “10 Things you need to succeed in 2004 and beyond.” Tactics, April 2004: 11.
Hugh, M., Ni Chen, Culbertson (1996). International Public Relations: A Comparative Analysis. Routledge.
Guiniven, J. E. (1998). Public relations executives view the curriculum: A needs assessment. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 54 (2), 48-56.
Lal, G. K. (2000). Curriculum Design - A General Perspective. From http://www.iitk.ac.in/infocell/ Archive/dirjuly3/curriculum.html (assessed on 14 December 2007).
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken (7th edition, first edition 1983). Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.
Neuendorf, K. (2002). The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Ornstein, A. & Hunkins, F. (2004). Curriculum Foundations, Principles, and Issues. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
Rourke & Anderson. (2004). Validity in Quantitative Content Analysis. from http://cider.athabascau.ca/summary/041122_Summary(accessed on January 8, 2008)
Seitel (2007). The Practice of Public Relations. (10h edition) New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Siriyuwasak, U. (1983). Karn suka nitatesart nai pratet Thai (Communication Arts Education in Thailand). Bangkok: Faculty of Communication Arts, Chulalongkorn University.
Sriramesh K. (2004). “Epilogue: The need for multiculturalism in public relations education in Asia". In Public Relations in Asia: An Anthology. Singapore: Thomson Learning. Edited by Sriramesh K.
Sriramesh K. and Hornaman (2006) Public relations as a profession: An analysis of curricular content in the United States Journal of Creative Communications. 2006; 1: 155-172.
Vocus White Paper. (2009). The Future of PR. From www.vocuseurope.com (assessed on 14 December 2009).
Wilcox, D. L., Cameron, G.T., Ault, P. H. & Agee W. K. (2006). Public Relations: Strategies and Tactics. (8th edition). New York: Longman.
Wimmer, D.R.: Dominick, J.R. (2003). Mass Media Research: an Introduction. Wadsworth.
Wright and Turk (2006). “Public relations knowledge and professionalism: Challenges to educators and practitioners” in The Future of Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Associates. Edited by Toth, Elizabeth, L. Management: Challenges for the Next Generation. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.