The Classroom Curriculum Development for National Aviation Security Instructor

Main Article Content

Zhang Yiyan
Supinda Lertlit

บทคัดย่อ

          The study aimed to identify the objectives related to the National Aviation Security Instructor Curriculum (NASIC), employing Outcome-Based Education (OBE) principles and the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) Model, and to evaluate the effectiveness of the NASIC implementation. The methodology included mixed research methods, both quantitative and qualitative, utilizing three rounds of Delphi surveys to determine the competencies of National Aviation Security Instructors (NASI). The development of NASIC was based on the analysis of expert opinions, utilizing various criteria such as positive coefficient, concentration of opinions, expert authority coefficient, and expert coordination coefficient. This process resulted in the identification of 33 competencies for NASIs. To evaluate the effectiveness of the curriculum, an experiment was conducted, involving both an experimental group and a control group. The study ensured there were no significant baseline differences between the two groups concerning demographics and background variables. The evaluation of the curriculum's effectiveness was carried out across three dimensions: knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Statistical analysis, including Chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney U tests, was performed on the data collected from both groups. The results indicated statistically significant differences between the experimental and control groups across all three areas of knowledge, skills, and attitudes, suggesting that the NASIC implementation had a positive impact. These findings provide a framework for future research in applying OBE concepts and the ADDIE model to other aviation curricula.

Article Details

รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
Yiyan , Z. ., & Lertlit, S. (2024). The Classroom Curriculum Development for National Aviation Security Instructor. Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi, 9(12), 220–228. สืบค้น จาก https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JRKSA/article/view/271404
ประเภทบทความ
บทความวิจัย

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. White Plains, NY: Addison-Wesley Longman.

Asselin, M., & Harper, M. (2014). Revisiting the Delphi technique: Implications for nursing professional development. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 30, 11-15. doi:10.1097/01.NND.0000434028.30432.34

Bamrara, A. & Chauhan, P. (2018). Applying ADDIE Model to Evaluate Faculty Development Programs. International Journal of Smart Education and Urban Society (IJSEUS), 9 (2), 25-38. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJSEUS.2018040103

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay Company.

Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1, 1-11.

Fitzpatrick, K. A. (1995). Leadership challenges of outcome-based reform. The education digest, 60 (5), 13.

Hamamah, H., Hapsari, Y., Emaliana, I., & Degeng, P. D. D. (2020). Integrated Academic Writing Assessment Model to Support The Implementation of OBE Curriculum. Jurnal Pendidikan, 5 (7), 1040-1047.

Harden, R. M. (2007). Outcome-Based Education: the future is today. Medical Teacher, 29 (7), 625–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701729930

Gonzalez, L. (2022). The Myadvisor Compass: A First-Year Student ExperienceProgram (Doctoral dissertation, Barry University).

International Civil Aviation Organization. (2022). ICAO Global Implementation Support Symposium 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.icaogiss2022.com/

Landeta, J. (2006). Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technological forecasting and social change, 73 (5), 467-482.

Malan, B. M. (2014). Curriculum 2005: Transformation and outcomes-based education (Doctoral dissertation, University of Johannesburg (South Africa)).

McPherson, S., Reese, C., & Wendler, M. C. (2018). Methodology update: Delphi studies. Nursing research, 67 (5), 404-410.

Morrison, G.R, Ross, S.J., Morrison, J.R. & Kalman, H.K. (2019). Designing Effective Instruction, 8th Edition. John Wiley & Sons.

Nevzorov, R. (2021). Quality Management of Ground Training of Future Pilots in the Conditions of Modern Educational Space in Ukraine. Economics & Education, 6 (2), 90-94.

Shakila Thangaratinam, & Charles WE Redman. (2005). The Delphi technique, 7 (2), 120–125. doi:10.1576/toag.7.2.120.27071

Spady, W., & Marshall, K. J. (1991). Beyond traditional outcomes-based education. Educational Leadership, 49 (2), 67-72.

Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Wakefield, R., & Watson, T. (2014). A reappraisal of Delphi 2.0 for public relations research. Public Relations Review, 40 (3), 577-584.

Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice (2nd ed.). CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Yanawongsa, T., Intasingh, S., Nguenyuang, S., & Intanet, N. (2020). Outcome-Based Curriculum: New approach for Higher Education Curriculum. Humanities and Social Sciences Journal of Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, 15 (2), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.14456/psruhss. 2021.22

Zhang, X., Ma, Y., Jiang, Z., Chandrasekaran, S., Wang, Y., & Fonkoua Fofou, R. (2021). Application of Design-Based Learning and Outcome-Based Education in Basic Industrial Engineering Teaching: A New Teaching Method. Sustainability, 13 (5). doi:10.3390/su13052632