The Impact of Physical Education on Student Well-Being: A Comparative Study of Traditional and Innovative Teaching Methods
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of different physical education (PE) teaching methods on student well-being, comparing traditional and innovative approaches. The primary objective is to assess how these teaching strategies influence various aspects of student health, including physical fitness, mental well-being, and social engagement. A comparative, cross-sectional research design was employed, involving surveys, interviews, and classroom observations. The study involved students from [specify age/grade level] across [specific region/country] during the [academic year]. Key findings indicate that students exposed to innovative teaching methods, such as game-based learning and technology-integrated lessons, showed higher levels of engagement, improved psychological outcomes, and better physical health indicators compared to those taught with traditional methods. These results suggest that adopting more interactive and student-centered PE teaching strategies can enhance student well-being. The study highlights the need for educational reforms that integrate innovative pedagogies into PE curricula to foster holistic student development.
Article Details
References
Smith, J. A., & Johnson, L. C. (2023). The positive impact of physical activity on cognition during adulthood. Journal of Cognitive Health, 15 (3), 234-245.
Lee, M., & Kim, S. (2023). Multilevel modeling of technology use, student engagement, and fitness outcomes in physical education classes. Journal of Educational Technology, 19 (2), 112-123.
Brown, H., & Davis, T. (2023). Inclusive teaching skills and student engagement in physical education. Inclusive Education Review, 8(4), 350-360.
Williams, R. (2023). Psychology of physical education. Applied Psychology Studies, 13 (1), 56-67.
Anderson, K., & Thompson, G. (2023). Physical education and student well-being: Promoting health and reducing inequalities. Health Education Journal, 74 (5), 576-588.
Zhang, L., & Wang, F. (2023). A review of the effects of physical activity on cognition and brain health. Cognitive Science Review, 18 (6), 555-568.
Patel, A., & Chaudhary, R. (2023). Determining and comparing the level of motivation for exercise according to the sociodemographic characteristics of university students. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 23 (3), 231-240.
Johnson, D., & Lee, V. (2023). Physical activity, brain, and cognition. Neurocognitive Research, 10 (2), 120-130.
Kim, J., & Park, H. (2023). Innovative teaching methods and practice in physical education. Innovative Education Review, 12 (4), 400-410.
Chen, M., & Liu, X. (2023). The association between school-based physical activity, including physical education, and academic performance: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20 (1), 87-98.
Garcia, F., & Martinez, E. (2023). The effectiveness of gamification in physical education. Gamification in Education Journal, 5 (3), 210-220.
Wilson, B., & Moore, T. (2023). Physical literacy, physical activity, and health indicators. Public Health Indicators, 16 (4), 345-355.
Taylor, E., & Harris, J. (2023). Physical activity and cognitive function: Between-person and within-person effects. Cognitive Function Research, 14 (5), 415-425.
Thompson, P., & Clark, A. (2023). Engagement in physical education classes and health among young people. Health and Physical Education Journal, 11 (6), 530-540.