The Analysis of Gender Representations in EFL Textbooks
Main Article Content
Abstract
Students, both males and females, typically express interest in traditionally gender-typed occupations, roles, and responsibilities, females tend to display more variability in the role of their occupational preferences than males. Maleness is associate with strength, power, and authority. Most of them perceive their thought from their surroundings in school. The objectives of this study were: 1) to investigate the patterns of gender representations in Grade 6 EFL textbooks and 2) to examine how gender bias was portrayed in the textbooks. Three EFL textbooks were chosen as research materials. A mixed methods research design was used to examine the following categories: 1) gender visibility in texts and illustrations, 2) firstness, and 3) domestic roles and occupational roles. A check sheet was used as a research instrument to collect quantitative data; a content analysis method was used to gather qualitative data. The research results found the following details. First, the textbooks seemed to feature both genders. However, the males appeared more frequently than females in the texts and illustrations. Second, the firstness issued that males were mentioned first was much more than females. Third, for the domestic roles, the two textbooks showed contrary results. For the occupational roles, females’ occupations were less diverse than males’ and were restricted to stereotypical types.
Article Details
References
Abdelhay, B. & Benhaddouche, W. (2015). Gender Stereotyping through Textbook Illustrations: A Case Study of Algerian Middle School Textbook-Spotlight on English 1. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 6 (5), 435-440.
Albers, P. (2000). Visual Discourse Analysis. In pp. 85-98. P. Albers, T. Holbrook, and A. S. Flint (Eds.), New Methods of Literacy Research. UK: Routledge.
Ansary, H. & Babaii, E. (2002). Universal Characteristics of EFL/ESL Textbooks: A Steps towards Systematic Textbook Evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal, 3 (2). RetrievedOctober 17, 2021 from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Ansary-Textbooks/
Ansary, H. & Babaii, E. (2003). Subliminal Sexism in Current EFL/ESL Textbooks.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310604379_Subliminal_sexism_in_current_EFLESL_textbooks
Bem, S. (1981). Gender Schema Theory: A Cognitive Account of Sex Typing. PsychologicalReview, 88, 354-364. Retrieved on September 3rd, 2021 from https://ahcaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/gender_schema_theory.pdf
Bem S. (1994). Lenses of Gender: Transforming the Debate on Sexual Inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Ekowati, D. M., Noni, N. & Atmowardoyo, H. (2021). An Analysis on Gender Representation in Cambridge Checkpoint English Coursebook. Celebes Journal of Language Studies, 1 (1), 88-101. Retrieved on October 20, 2021 from http://www.harpressid.com/index. php/CJLS/article/view/40
Gharbavi, A. & Mousavi, S. A. (2012). A Content Analysis of Textbooks: Investigating Gender Bias as a Social Prominence in Iranian High School English Textbooks. English Linguistics Research, 1 (1), 42-49. Retrieved on October 13, 2021 from http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/elr/article/view/1234/681
Kijpoonphol, W., Trinan, K., Seelaboot, S. & Witoon, S. (2019). An Analysis of GenderRepresentation in Thai Primary School Health and Physical Education Textbooks. Inthe Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences 2019 (IC-HUSO 2019), Khon Kaen University. 49-65.
Khalid, Z. & Ghania, O. (2019). Gender Positioning in the Visual Discourse of Algerian Secondary Education EFL Textbooks: Critical Image Analysis VS Teachers’ Perceptions. In Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15 (3), 773-793. Retrieved on October 1, 2021 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1230242.pdf
Lindsey, L. L. (2015). Gender Roles: A Sociological Perspective. New York: Routledge.
Nader, L. (1986). The Subordination of Women in Comparative Perspective. Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development: Women in the Americas: Relationships, Work and Power, 15 (3/4), 377 – 397. Retrieved on February 2, 2022 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40553088
OECD (2024). SIGI 2024 Regional Report for Southeast Asia: Time to Care. Social Institutions and Gender Index. OECD iLibrary. https://doi.org/10.1787/7fc15e1c-en
Porreca, K. L. (1984). Sexism in Current ESL Textbooks. TESOL Quarterly, 18(4), 705-724. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586584
Richards, J. C. (2001). The Role of Textbooks in a Language Program. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Santoma, I. (2020). Designation of Gender on Electronic EFL Textbook for Senior High School. Indonesian EFL Journal (IEFLJ), 6(2), 127-138, Retrieved on October 13, 2021 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c464/1cc9e5c8a612b6b421c86d21724e49dc5865.pdf?_ga=2.155323004.612589407.1634700394-885412573.1634700394
Stein, N. (2017). Basic Education Rights Handbook. N.p.: Education Rights in South Africa.
Suchana, A. A. (2020). Representation of Women in Occupational and Domestic Roles in EfT Textbooks. International Journal of English, 8(4), 43-48. Retrieved on February 2,2022 from http://www.shanlaxjournals.comb
Sunderland, J. (2000). New understandings of gender and language classroom research:Texts, teacher talk and student talk. Language Teaching Research, 4(2), 149-173.
Svien, J. (2018). Toward 21st Century Egalitarianism: Gender Representation in a Contemporary EFL Textbook. Journal and Proceedings of GALE 2018, 10, 5-33.
Tarrayo, V. N. (2014). Gendered word (or world): Sexism in Philippine preschool Englishlanguage textbooks. I-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 4(2),April – June, 25-32. Retrieved on February 2, 2022 fromhttps://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1068440
Teig, S. & Susskind, J. E. (2008). Truck Driver or Nurse? The Impact of Gender Roles and Occupational Status on Children’s Occupational Preferences. Sex Roles, (58), 848-863. Retrieved on October 17, 2021 from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s 11199-008-9410-x.pdf