Participatory Management Model for Building Safety in Educational Institutions Schools Under the Office of Secondary Education Service Area

Abstract

          The main objective of this research is to develop a participatory management model to create safety. In educational institutions, schools under the jurisdiction of the Secondary education Service Area Office Conducting research have 3 steps. Consisting of 1) studying the components and methods of participatory management to create safety in educational institutions 2) Creating a participatory management model to create safety in educational institutions by using information Step 1: Let's draft a model and check the appropriateness of the model with a group discussion with experts. 9 experts 3) Evaluation of participatory management models to create safety in Educational Institutions The sample group includes educational institution directors. Deputy Director of Educational Institution and supervisor Safety in educational institutions, 80 people, purposive selection Research tools include a feasibility assessment form and usefulness Data were analyzed by mean and standard deviation. The research results found that 1. Study of components and guidelines for participatory management to create safety in educational institutions, from the synthesis of documents, concepts, theories, and related research, can be classified into 4 elements as follows: 1) Participatory management factors 2) Participants in safety management in educational institutions 3) Scope of safety in educational institutions 4) Participatory management processes 2. Creating a participatory management model to create safety in educational institutions by Interviews and studies of management guidelines from educational institutions that have best practices (Best Practice) and Interview with experts It has the following components: Component 1: Participatory management factors to create Safety in educational institutions consists of 4 aspects as follows: 1) Budget management 2) Setting up an educational atmosphere. The physical aspect of the educational institution 3) The policy setting aspect of the educational institution 4) The leadership aspect of educational institution administrators Component 2, those involved in participatory management to create safety in educational institutions, consists of 4 areas as follows: 1) the educational institution safety committee, 2) the student council committee, 3) the sector network agencies. Government and private sector 4) Parent network committee Component 3: Safety framework in educational institutions consists of 4 areas as follows: 1) Student care and support system work 2) Building safety work 3) Environmental cleanliness work 4) Student health promotion work. Component 4: Participatory management process to create safety in educational institutions, consisting of 5 aspects as follows: 1) Participation in planning, 2) Participation in decision-making, 3) Participation in operations, 4) Participation in supervision 5) Participation in evaluation 3. Evaluating the participatory management model to create safety in educational institutions and schools is possible and beneficial. It was found that the results of evaluating the feasibility of the participatory management model to create safety in educational institutions. Schools under the jurisdiction of the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Overall, it is at the highest level ( = 4.66), passing the criteria. When considering each element, it is found that the element with the highest average is component 1, at the highest level ( = 4.81) passing the criteria. Next is element 2 at the highest level (  = 4.68) passing the criteria. Next is element 3 at the highest level (  = 4.66) passing the criteria. And next is the element that 4 is at a high level. ( = 4.54), passing the criteria Results of evaluating the usefulness of the participatory management model for creating safety in educational institutions. Schools under the jurisdiction of the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Overall, it is at the highest level. ( = 4.68) passed the criteria. When considering each element, it was found that the element with the highest average was element 1 at the highest level ( = 4.76) passed the criteria, followed by element 2 in The highest level ( = 4.70)passed the criteria, followed by component 3 at a high level ( = 4.69) passed the criteria, and next was component 4 at a high level (  = 4.59) passed the criteria