The Research on Residential Interior Space Design Based on the Individual Needs for Elderlies

Main Article Content

Feng Wang
Isarachai Buranaut

Abstract

          The form of aging in China is severe. In this context, the needs of the older people are becoming more and more prominent. Due to the limitations of the social development level and the influence of traditional concepts, the model of “aging in place” has been widely promoted in China. It is increasingly important to integrate the individual needs of the older people into the interior space design of home care. Age-friendly home care interior space design aims to create a safe, convenient, personalized and intelligent living environment to meet the diverse needs of the older people in their daily lives. This paper firstly proposes four major design principles, namely, the principle of complying with the co-existence of spatial safety and convenience, the principle of co-existence of continuity and flexibility, the principle of personalization in the selection of decorative elements, and the principle of intelligent spatial design, which provide a systematic framework for designers. These principles theoretically build the foundation of age-friendly space design and provide guidelines for actual design. And four major design strategies are proposed based on these four principles. Through these design principles and strategies, this paper provides scientific and reasonable guidance for the design of age-friendly home care interior space, aiming to create a safe, comfortable and personality-filled living environment for older people.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wang, F., & Buranaut, I. . (2024). The Research on Residential Interior Space Design Based on the Individual Needs for Elderlies. Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi, 9(4), 827–837. Retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JRKSA/article/view/267025
Section
Academic Article

References

Albers, J. (2013). Interaction of color: Yale University Press.

Bridger, R. (2008). Introduction to ergonomics: Crc Press.

Callahan Jr, J. J. (2019). Aging in place: Routledge.

Connidis, I. A., & Barnett, A. E. (2018). Family ties and aging: Sage publications.

Cox, P. (1957). Methods for Population Projection by Sex and Age. In: Wiley Online Library.

Das, B., & Grady, R. M. (1983). The normal working area in the horizontal plane A comparative analysis between Farley's and Squires' concepts. Ergonomics. 26 (5), 449-459.

Demirkan, H. (2007). Housing for the aging population. European review of aging and physical activity, 4 (1), 33-38.

Forsyth, A., & Molinsky, J. (2021). What is aging in place? Confusions and contradictions. Housing Policy Debate, 31 (2), 181-196.

Fougner, M., Bergland, A., Lund, A., & Debesay, J. (2019). Aging and exercise: Perceptions of the active lived-body. Physiotherapy theory and practice, 35 (7), 651-662.

Garneau, C. J., & Parkinson, M. B. (2016). A survey of anthropometry and physical accommodation in ergonomics curricula. Ergonomics, 59 (1), 143-154.

Hu, H., Li, Z., Yan, J., Wang, X., Xiao, H., Duan, J., & Zheng, L. (2007). Anthropometric measurement of the Chinese elderly living in the Beijing area. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37 (4), 303-311.

Li, X., Fan, L., & Leng, S. X. (2018). The aging tsunami and senior healthcare development in China. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 66 (8), 1462-1468.

Lin, Y. (2018). An institutional and governance approach to understand large-scale social housing construction in China. Habitat International, 78, 96-105.

Murrell, K. (2012). Ergonomics: Man in his working environment: Springer Science & Business Media.

Ostwald, W. (2022). The color primer: A basic treatise on the color system of Wilhelm Ostwald: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.

Rosenwohl-Mack, A., Schumacher, K., Fang, M.-L., & Fukuoka, Y. (2020). A new conceptual model of experiences of aging in place in the United States: Results of a systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative studies. International journal of nursing studies, 10 (3), 103496.

Serrano-Jiménez, A., Blandón-González, B., & Barrios-Padura, Á. (2022). Towards a built environment without physical barriers: An accessibility assessment procedure and action protocol for social housing occupied by the elderly. Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103456.

Tosi, F., & Tosi, F. (2020). Design for ergonomics: Springer.

Wang, F., Buranaut, I., Zhang, B., & Liu, J. (2023). Elderly-friendly indoor vertical dimensional layout method based on joint mobility. Plos one, 18 (5), e0285741.

Zhou, F., Ji, Y., & Jiao, R. J. (2021). Emotional design. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 236-251.

Żurek, J., Rudy, M., Stanisławczyk, R., & Duma-Kocan, P. (2023). The Effect of Kosher Determinants of Beef on Its Color, Texture Profile and Sensory Evaluation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20 (2), 1378.