The Ex-post evaluation of Legislation

Abstract

          The objectives of this research were 1) to study the guidelines, processes, and criteria for achieving best practices in the ex-post evaluation of legislation. 2) to acknowledge the number of legal related to criminal justice processes that should review and prioritize based on their importance to propose actions such as cancellation, amendment, or other means of proceeding. This research will use a mixed-methods approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative methods. Collect the quantitative data from 556 relevant stakeholders or service users from agencies involved in the dispute resolution process and the qualitative data from in-depth interviews with a targeted group of 60 key informants who are legal practitioners in the process of judgment and two focus group discussions with 61 participants, including legal practitioners involved in the dispute resolution process and relevant stakeholders. The research findings show that: 1) There are 355 legal related to criminal dispute resolution, including those in pre-trial, during the trial, and post-trial 2) Thailand uses a civil law system, resulting increasing number of written legal. number of written legal. It's necessary to review and update the legal to relevance and appropriateness. The mechanism for reviewing many legal at once is the Regulatory Guillotine Approach mechanism for reviewing and updating many legal in a single process based on the 5Cs principle: Cut, Change, Consolidate, Codify, and Coordinate. 3) Under the principle of the 5Cs, the analysis of the legal aspects of criminal dispute resolution that should review for appropriateness reveals 16 out of 355. The different legal have no issues with the procedural burden on officials or prescribed for a long time without circumstances or situations that caused enforcement. The prescribed legal recently has not encountered any obstacles and various responsibilities.