The Development of Academic Reading Instruction Model by Using Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach (CALLA) and Problem-Based Instruction to Enhance Academic English Reading Ability, Learning Strategies and Problem-Solving Ability
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research were 1) to develop and find the effectiveness of the teaching style 2) to study the use of learning strategies 3) to study problem-solving skills 4) to study the opinions. The samples were 30 students of English major of Faculty of Arts Bangkokthonburi university, in academic year B.E. 2563 selected. The research’s tools were 1) English test 2) questionnaire 3) learning strategies measurement 4) reading ability test 5) problem solving skills measurement. The qualitative data were analyzed by mean (x), standard deviation (S.D.), and t-test dependent. The research results were as follows
1. The development and efficiency comprised 5 elements and tools for measurement and evaluation which was the five steps: 1. Preparatory stage, 2. Presentation stage, 3. Practical step, 4. Self-assessment step, and 5. Extended stage and efficiency of the model met the assigned criteria 80/80 (80.03/80.47).
2. Comparison of the students' problem-solving skills measurement was found that the students’ post-learning was higher than the pre-learning with the statistical significance of .05.
3. The students' opinions were found that the mean was 4.19 and the standard deviation was 0.58.
4. The form accreditation by 5 experts was at a high level (mean = 4.18, standard deviation = 0.30.)
Article Details
References
ชัยยยงค์ พรหมวงศ์. (2556). การทดสอบประสิทธิภาพสื่อหรือชุดการสอน. วารสารศิลปากร ศึกษาศาสตร์. 5 (3), 7-20
มาเรียม นิลพันธ์. (2553). วิจัยทางการศึกษา. (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 5). นครปฐม: โรงพิมพ์ มหาวิทยาลัยศิลปากร.
สุพิมล ทรงประดิษฐ์. (2541). การสอนซ่อมเสริมการอ่านภาษาอังกฤษเพื่อความเข้าใจ โดยใช้ภาพการ์ตูนประกอบบทเรียน สำหรับนักเรียนชั้นประถมศึกษาปีที่ 5. วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญาศึกษาศาสตร มหาบัณฑิต สาขาวิชาหลักสูตรและการสอน. บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย: มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่.
Anderson, N. J. (2003). Metacognitive reading strategies increase L2 performance. The Language Teacher. 27, 20-22.
Bisland, A (2004). Using learning strategies instruction with students who are gifted and learning disabled. Gifted Child Today. 2 (3), 52-58.
Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (2000). The university of learning. London: Kogan, page 49.
Braten, I., & Samuelstuen, M.S. (2007). Measuring strategic processing: comparing task specific self-reports to traces. Metacognition and Learning. 2, 1–20.
Broussard, S.C., & Garrison, M.E.B. (2004). The relationship between classroom motivation and academic achievement in elementary school-aged children. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal. 33 (2), 106-120.
Chamot, A. U. (2005). The Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach (CALLA): An update. In P. A. Richard-Amato & M. A. Snow (Eds.). Academic success For English language learners: Strategies for K-12 mainstream teachers, p. 87-102. White Plains NY: Longman.
Chamot, A. U. (2007). Accelerating academic achievement of English language learners: A synthesis of five evaluations of the CALLA Model. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.) The international handbook of English language learning, Part I, p. 317-331. Norwell, MA: Springer Publications.
Clump, M. A., Bauer, H. & Bradley, C. (2004). The extent to which Psychology students read textbooks: A multiple class analysis of reading across the Psychology curriculum. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 31, 227-229.
Docktor, J.L. and Heller, K. (2009). Assessment of student problem solving processes, in Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference 2009. edited by M. Sabella, C. Henderson, and C. Singh (AIP Conference Proceedings 1179, Melville, NY, pp. 133–136.
Evensen, D. H., Salisbury-Glennon, J., & Glenn, J. (2001). A qualitative study of 6 medical students in a problem-based curriculum: Towards a situated model of self-regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology. 93, 659–676.
Huang, H., Chern, C. & Lin, C. (2009). EFL Learners’ Use of Online Reading Strategies and Comprehension of Texts. An Exploratory Study, Computers and Education. 52, 13-26.
Koda, K. (2007). Reading and language learning: Cross linguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning. 57 (1), 1–44.
McKenna, M.C. (2001). Development of reading attitudes. In Verhoeven, L. & Snow, C.E. Literacy and Motivation. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 135-176.
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology. 94 (2), 249-259.
Mastan, W. and Teo, A. (2017). Students’ Preference for Teachers’ Motivational Strategies and their Perception of their Own Motivation toward Learning English: A Case of Private Vocational Colleges. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts. 17 (1), 161-186.
Pelaez, N. J. (2002). Problem-Based Writing with Peer Review Improves Academic Performance in Physiology. Advances in Physiology Education. 26 (3), 174–184.
